- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: What makes the 200m harder than the 100m it seems?
Posted on 8/8/24 at 7:45 am to CharlieTiger
Posted on 8/8/24 at 7:45 am to CharlieTiger
Liles likes to sandbag in the prelims and semis from what I've seen and heard. But when it comes to the finals, he's all business
Posted on 8/8/24 at 8:17 am to Frac the world
Michael Johnson's 19.32 stood until Bolt beat it in 2008 with a 19.30 (later set the current mark in 2009 @ 19.19). Those two guys are the most dominant 200-meter runners I have ever seen. And Johnson had that funky upright running style but man could he fly. The split of the 19.32 at 9.66 per 100 Meters was mindblowing at the time. It took until Bolt ran a 9.58 in 2009 for anyone to achieve a 100-meter race that beat Johnson's split. Also, Johnson was a notoriously slow starter, so I cannot imagine what his best time for 100M is within that 200M run.
An interesting chart of the progression of electronically timed 200M records.

An interesting chart of the progression of electronically timed 200M records.

Popular
Back to top
