- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Lsujacket66
| Favorite team: | |
| Location: | |
| Biography: | |
| Interests: | |
| Occupation: | |
| Number of Posts: | 5598 |
| Registered on: | 12/2/2010 |
| Online Status: | Online |
Recent Posts
Message
If you didn’t expect last nights outcome, you’re blind
Posted by Lsujacket66 on 10/6/26 at 12:24 pm
I kind of don’t understand the freak out.
1. Atl has elite OL/DL and the best RB in the league… if you didn’t know they’d run the ball down our throats and get good pass rush… what have you been watching?
2. We have improved the roster but we are still rebuilding and don’t have depth, once injuries happen we look terrible.
3. The OL should be better. Richards obviously isn’t the only problem and I’d love to see Wright get some playing time to see if he’s the answer at RG for the future.
4. This season was all about making sure Shough is the guy, and he’s proven that and he’s got the skill players he needs. A running game would help though.
5. This offseason will be all about building up the defense through the draft and free agency. We need a pass rusher opposite Young, we need another run stuffing DT, we need a true CB1.
1. Atl has elite OL/DL and the best RB in the league… if you didn’t know they’d run the ball down our throats and get good pass rush… what have you been watching?
2. We have improved the roster but we are still rebuilding and don’t have depth, once injuries happen we look terrible.
3. The OL should be better. Richards obviously isn’t the only problem and I’d love to see Wright get some playing time to see if he’s the answer at RG for the future.
4. This season was all about making sure Shough is the guy, and he’s proven that and he’s got the skill players he needs. A running game would help though.
5. This offseason will be all about building up the defense through the draft and free agency. We need a pass rusher opposite Young, we need another run stuffing DT, we need a true CB1.
re: Should have drafted Caleb Downs or Bain
Posted by Lsujacket66 on 10/6/26 at 6:18 am to Islandboy777
For everyone saying Downs was the pick… we have 3 good safeties who haven’t been a problem. Our problem is DT, DE, LB and Corner,
Delane was the guy we needed. After he was gone there really wasn’t anyone there that met need and value.
Delane was the guy we needed. After he was gone there really wasn’t anyone there that met need and value.
re: Are we close to going to war with Canada?
Posted by Lsujacket66 on 10/5/26 at 11:53 am to SlowFlowPro
quote:
But if they invite the Chinese in right on our border, they are in trouble. That is a direct provocation. Our trade war was the provocation The admin thought we could bully them with our size and their dependance on us. Canada is simply pivoting strategy Do I want more Chinese influence in our continent? No. That's why this trade war was so stupid and short-sighted.
Was the trade war the provocation? Or was it them being Chinese whores and allowing China to undercut our tariffs the problem?
re: Are we close to going to war with Canada?
Posted by Lsujacket66 on 10/5/26 at 8:15 am to Powerman
quote:
This situation becomes even more stupid when you realize that the trade war started escalating during the height of the energy crisis that we largely created unnecessarily and we depend heavily on Canada for crude imports. You couldn't draw up a more retarded playbook if you tried.
Lmao we don’t heavily rely on Canadian energy imports. In fact most of the energy imported goes from Alberta into the US and then right back into Canada
re: Are we close to going to war with Canada?
Posted by Lsujacket66 on 10/5/26 at 7:53 am to TygerTyger
quote:
A war with Canadia would look like the McNeese game. No fricks given, no running clock.
Exactly. No need to listen to all of Carney’s bullshite, just take them over and tell them to STFU.
Are we close to going to war with Canada?
Posted by Lsujacket66 on 10/5/26 at 7:46 am
Look I don’t mind what we did with Iran… but I actually think Canada is a much bigger problem. Carney trying to basically set Canada up as a Chinese transshipping depot is pretty much a direct attack on our country.
In a western hemisphere we have completely reshaped to be pro USA, once Brazil’s elections are done, Canada will basically be the one major hold out.
They’re a bunch of pussies but do have energy and lumber that’s valuable
In a western hemisphere we have completely reshaped to be pro USA, once Brazil’s elections are done, Canada will basically be the one major hold out.
They’re a bunch of pussies but do have energy and lumber that’s valuable
re: East of Eden (Netflix) Discussion *Now Streaming*
Posted by Lsujacket66 on 10/4/26 at 10:17 pm to Ohana
quote:
the first 2 episodes in and the overall consensus is p**** stays undefeated.
Spoiler**
I just couldn’t get over her detesting the brother who wanted to care for her and marry her…. Yet bangs his brother who hates her.
re: East of Eden (Netflix) Discussion *Now Streaming*
Posted by Lsujacket66 on 10/4/26 at 3:51 pm to ColonelAngus
quote:
On e3. So far Cathy/Kate is shown as maniputalive monster.
Just started ep 3… never read book, just a big fan of Florence… great so far but good lord Cathy is a monster,
re: Trump is making Nuclear Energy Great Again
Posted by Lsujacket66 on 10/2/26 at 5:14 pm to captainFid
quote:
Nuclear-Powered Merchant Ships: Transportation Secretary Sean Duffy has launched an initiative to deploy Small Modular Reactors (SMRs) on American commercial shipping vessels, aiming to rebuild American maritime power for the 21st century [16:39].
An interesting byproduct of the smr powered ships is they’ll be able to carry heavier cargo loads due to not needing the storage and weight capacity for the fuel it would’ve needed to power ship.
re: Trump is making Nuclear Energy Great Again
Posted by Lsujacket66 on 10/2/26 at 3:41 pm to Reubaltaich
quote:
I have been advocating nuclear p'wer for a long time on here and other platforms. It’s safe, its track record is second to none. It blows away the mickey mouse solar and wind boondoggles by miles. The spent rods can be reprocessed, ala France. We use it on submarines, aircraft carriers...with no major incidents. NP is the cleanest, greenest form of energy that can last for centuries.
I’m really excited about SMRs and the ability for data centers or our military bases to use them to fulfill their own energy needs
re: Trump is making Nuclear Energy Great Again
Posted by Lsujacket66 on 10/2/26 at 3:39 pm to Tigersforthee
quote:
Theres zero chance the next Dem administration doesnt shut this down on day 1 and embezzle the funds for other things. If Dems wanted cheap energy blue states wouldn't be the most expensive in the nation. So good luck getting 25 years of exclusively Republican leadership til 2050
Actually the permitting reform bill that’s about to pass has a clause to basically not allow future admins to stop already approved and funded projects… Dems want it because Trump stopped all their green scam projects
Trump is making Nuclear Energy Great Again
Posted by Lsujacket66 on 10/2/26 at 3:08 pm
One of the biggest mistakes in the last century was slowing down nuclear energy., Trump is fixing that.
As of October 2, 2026, the Trump administration’s nuclear push is much broader than the Vistra story. The overarching federal target is to expand U.S. nuclear capacity from roughly 100 GW to 400 GW by 2050.
* ~$4B Vistra loan package — reported: Bloomberg reports the administration is preparing roughly $4 billion in financing for Vistra to upgrade/uprate Perry, Davis-Besse and Beaver Valley, complementing Vistra’s existing plan to add about 433 MW at those plants. The broader UPRISE program explicitly provides federal financing for these kinds of uprates.
* 5 GW of uprates to existing nuclear plants: DOE’s UPRISE program is targeting +2.5 GW by 2027 and +5 GW by 2029 through uprates, efficiency improvements, restarts and other upgrades to existing plants. DOE says its financing office has $289B+ of total loan authority and can finance up to 80% of eligible nuclear-uprate costs.
* Restarting Duane Arnold in Iowa: DOE just closed a $1.9B loan to NextEra to restart the 615-MW plant, which shut down in 2020. Target restart is around 2029, subject to NRC approvals.
* Restarting Three Mile Island Unit 1/Crane: DOE closed a $1B loan to Constellation to restart the 835-MW Pennsylvania reactor that shut in 2019. Microsoft has separately contracted for its output.
* Continuing the Palisades restart: The administration has continued supporting the $1.52B federal loan originally closed in September 2024 for Holtec’s restart of the 800-MW Michigan plant.
* 10 new large reactors: Trump ordered DOE to work toward having 10 new large conventional reactors with complete designs under construction by 2030.
* $17.5B financing for those reactors: DOE subsequently announced a $17.5B conditional loan program for long-lead equipment for as many as 10 Westinghouse AP1000 reactors, potentially adding about 11 GW.
* South Korean investment / eight reactors: This week Trump announced a broader U.S.–South Korean investment package that includes plans involving eight U.S. nuclear plants. Reuters reports South Korea confirmed $142.3B in nuclear and gas investments, although details and commitments for individual projects remain subject to development.
* SMRs: DOE has selected eight companies for more than $94M of cost-shared funding aimed at getting advanced light-water SMRs through licensing, supply-chain and site-preparation hurdles.
* TVA + Holtec SMRs: DOE awarded $800M in late 2025 to TVA and Holtec projects aimed at advancing deployment of advanced light-water SMRs.
* Advanced/microreactor crash program: DOE created a Reactor Pilot Program allowing developers to demonstrate advanced reactors through DOE’s authorization system. Eleven projects were initially selected.
* Four advanced reactors reached criticality: DOE says four advanced test reactors achieved criticality by July 4, 2026, exceeding Trump’s initial goal of three. These are demonstrations rather than full commercial power plants.
* Nuclear Energy Launch Pad: DOE/NRIC has created a new pathway intended to move successful reactor and nuclear-fuel demonstrations toward commercial deployment faster.
* Nuclear at military bases: Trump ordered the Defense Department to establish a nuclear-energy program and have an Army-regulated reactor operating at a U.S. military installation by September 30, 2028.
* Nuclear-powered AI/data centers on federal land: DOE was directed to allow privately financed advanced reactors at DOE sites to supply AI/data centers and other critical infrastructure, with an initial goal of getting the first reactor operating within 30 months of the May 2025 order.
* Four major federal sites opened for AI/energy development: DOE selected Idaho National Laboratory, Oak Ridge, Paducah and Savannah River for private AI/data-center and associated energy infrastructure development. Nuclear is among the technologies being pursued.
* Savannah River nuclear/AI project: DOE/NNSA selected Amentum to negotiate development of a 1-GW AI data center with roughly 2 GW of dedicated generation, initially gas with a planned transition toward nuclear.
* $2.7B domestic uranium enrichment expansion: DOE awarded $900M each to American Centrifuge/Centrus, General Matter and Orano Federal Services to expand domestic LEU and HALEU enrichment.
* HALEU fuel bank: Trump’s order directs DOE to make at least 20 metric tons of HALEU available for qualifying advanced-reactor projects at DOE-controlled sites.
* Rebuild essentially the entire nuclear fuel chain: A new Defense Production Act consortium involving 90+ companies is addressing uranium mining/milling ? conversion ? enrichment ? deconversion ? fuel fabrication ? recycling/reprocessing.
* Fuel Line Pilot Program: DOE is letting private companies develop advanced nuclear fuel-production lines under an accelerated DOE pathway, intended to solve one of the main bottlenecks for advanced reactors.
* Reprocessing spent nuclear fuel: The administration is explicitly trying to revive U.S. nuclear-fuel recycling/reprocessing, including commercial demonstrations that could recover usable uranium/plutonium and fabricate new reactor fuel.
* $19M for used-fuel recycling R&D: Five U.S. companies received funding in February 2026 for technologies to recycle used nuclear fuel.
* Reconsidering surplus plutonium: Trump’s order halted most of DOE’s “dilute and dispose” approach and directed DOE to investigate making surplus plutonium available in forms usable as advanced-reactor fuel, subject to legal and national-security requirements.
* Major NRC overhaul: Trump ordered NRC regulatory reforms, including targeted review deadlines of 18 months for new-reactor construction/operation applications and 12 months for continued operation of existing reactors, standardized pathways for microreactors/SMRs, and expedited treatment of designs previously tested by DOE/DOD.
* Longer lives for today’s nuclear fleet: Federal policy now explicitly favors license extensions and continued operation of existing plants, alongside uprating them rather than relying solely on new construction.
So the big picture: it’s effectively a whole-industry strategy—keep today’s ~100 GW fleet running longer ? squeeze more GW from it ? restart closed plants ? build 10 large reactors ? accelerate SMRs/microreactors ? rebuild domestic uranium/enrichment/fuel manufacturing ? revive recycling/reprocessing ? use federal loans and federal sites to accelerate deployment ? reform NRC licensing. The stated destination is ~400 GW of U.S. nuclear capacity by 2050, roughly 4× today’s level.
As of October 2, 2026, the Trump administration’s nuclear push is much broader than the Vistra story. The overarching federal target is to expand U.S. nuclear capacity from roughly 100 GW to 400 GW by 2050.
* ~$4B Vistra loan package — reported: Bloomberg reports the administration is preparing roughly $4 billion in financing for Vistra to upgrade/uprate Perry, Davis-Besse and Beaver Valley, complementing Vistra’s existing plan to add about 433 MW at those plants. The broader UPRISE program explicitly provides federal financing for these kinds of uprates.
* 5 GW of uprates to existing nuclear plants: DOE’s UPRISE program is targeting +2.5 GW by 2027 and +5 GW by 2029 through uprates, efficiency improvements, restarts and other upgrades to existing plants. DOE says its financing office has $289B+ of total loan authority and can finance up to 80% of eligible nuclear-uprate costs.
* Restarting Duane Arnold in Iowa: DOE just closed a $1.9B loan to NextEra to restart the 615-MW plant, which shut down in 2020. Target restart is around 2029, subject to NRC approvals.
* Restarting Three Mile Island Unit 1/Crane: DOE closed a $1B loan to Constellation to restart the 835-MW Pennsylvania reactor that shut in 2019. Microsoft has separately contracted for its output.
* Continuing the Palisades restart: The administration has continued supporting the $1.52B federal loan originally closed in September 2024 for Holtec’s restart of the 800-MW Michigan plant.
* 10 new large reactors: Trump ordered DOE to work toward having 10 new large conventional reactors with complete designs under construction by 2030.
* $17.5B financing for those reactors: DOE subsequently announced a $17.5B conditional loan program for long-lead equipment for as many as 10 Westinghouse AP1000 reactors, potentially adding about 11 GW.
* South Korean investment / eight reactors: This week Trump announced a broader U.S.–South Korean investment package that includes plans involving eight U.S. nuclear plants. Reuters reports South Korea confirmed $142.3B in nuclear and gas investments, although details and commitments for individual projects remain subject to development.
* SMRs: DOE has selected eight companies for more than $94M of cost-shared funding aimed at getting advanced light-water SMRs through licensing, supply-chain and site-preparation hurdles.
* TVA + Holtec SMRs: DOE awarded $800M in late 2025 to TVA and Holtec projects aimed at advancing deployment of advanced light-water SMRs.
* Advanced/microreactor crash program: DOE created a Reactor Pilot Program allowing developers to demonstrate advanced reactors through DOE’s authorization system. Eleven projects were initially selected.
* Four advanced reactors reached criticality: DOE says four advanced test reactors achieved criticality by July 4, 2026, exceeding Trump’s initial goal of three. These are demonstrations rather than full commercial power plants.
* Nuclear Energy Launch Pad: DOE/NRIC has created a new pathway intended to move successful reactor and nuclear-fuel demonstrations toward commercial deployment faster.
* Nuclear at military bases: Trump ordered the Defense Department to establish a nuclear-energy program and have an Army-regulated reactor operating at a U.S. military installation by September 30, 2028.
* Nuclear-powered AI/data centers on federal land: DOE was directed to allow privately financed advanced reactors at DOE sites to supply AI/data centers and other critical infrastructure, with an initial goal of getting the first reactor operating within 30 months of the May 2025 order.
* Four major federal sites opened for AI/energy development: DOE selected Idaho National Laboratory, Oak Ridge, Paducah and Savannah River for private AI/data-center and associated energy infrastructure development. Nuclear is among the technologies being pursued.
* Savannah River nuclear/AI project: DOE/NNSA selected Amentum to negotiate development of a 1-GW AI data center with roughly 2 GW of dedicated generation, initially gas with a planned transition toward nuclear.
* $2.7B domestic uranium enrichment expansion: DOE awarded $900M each to American Centrifuge/Centrus, General Matter and Orano Federal Services to expand domestic LEU and HALEU enrichment.
* HALEU fuel bank: Trump’s order directs DOE to make at least 20 metric tons of HALEU available for qualifying advanced-reactor projects at DOE-controlled sites.
* Rebuild essentially the entire nuclear fuel chain: A new Defense Production Act consortium involving 90+ companies is addressing uranium mining/milling ? conversion ? enrichment ? deconversion ? fuel fabrication ? recycling/reprocessing.
* Fuel Line Pilot Program: DOE is letting private companies develop advanced nuclear fuel-production lines under an accelerated DOE pathway, intended to solve one of the main bottlenecks for advanced reactors.
* Reprocessing spent nuclear fuel: The administration is explicitly trying to revive U.S. nuclear-fuel recycling/reprocessing, including commercial demonstrations that could recover usable uranium/plutonium and fabricate new reactor fuel.
* $19M for used-fuel recycling R&D: Five U.S. companies received funding in February 2026 for technologies to recycle used nuclear fuel.
* Reconsidering surplus plutonium: Trump’s order halted most of DOE’s “dilute and dispose” approach and directed DOE to investigate making surplus plutonium available in forms usable as advanced-reactor fuel, subject to legal and national-security requirements.
* Major NRC overhaul: Trump ordered NRC regulatory reforms, including targeted review deadlines of 18 months for new-reactor construction/operation applications and 12 months for continued operation of existing reactors, standardized pathways for microreactors/SMRs, and expedited treatment of designs previously tested by DOE/DOD.
* Longer lives for today’s nuclear fleet: Federal policy now explicitly favors license extensions and continued operation of existing plants, alongside uprating them rather than relying solely on new construction.
So the big picture: it’s effectively a whole-industry strategy—keep today’s ~100 GW fleet running longer ? squeeze more GW from it ? restart closed plants ? build 10 large reactors ? accelerate SMRs/microreactors ? rebuild domestic uranium/enrichment/fuel manufacturing ? revive recycling/reprocessing ? use federal loans and federal sites to accelerate deployment ? reform NRC licensing. The stated destination is ~400 GW of U.S. nuclear capacity by 2050, roughly 4× today’s level.
re: Michael Heldman - DE Kansas City Chiefs
Posted by Lsujacket66 on 10/2/26 at 12:43 pm to Kevin TheRant
Guys saw 2 good pass rushes vs 4th team guys and then he disappeared the rest of the preseason and yet some still think he’s the next Trey Hendrickson
re: Post week 3 NFL draft wants/needs
Posted by Lsujacket66 on 9/29/26 at 9:45 am to saints5021
quote:
We need a true 3-4 Edge rusher. Cam, Grando and Wilson are all converted 4-3 Ends. Young is a monster. Line up a real dude that can cover and rush on the other side and our defense is at another level. I don't trust this team to draft well on offensive line, so you get rid of Ruiz and go sign another David Edwards. CB is the other obvious need, as we have nothing behind KoolAide.
Agree a legit pass rusher and an elite DT would take us to another level. I actually think Riley has been good this year.
Give me will Echols and Princewii Umanimelean in the draft and I’m excited
re: Post week 3 NFL draft wants/needs
Posted by Lsujacket66 on 9/28/26 at 2:54 pm to WicKed WayZ
quote:
They need to extend Young ASAP.
Doubt his agent would let him go cheap again… his next deal gonna be like 3 yr 140 mil
re: Post week 3 NFL draft wants/needs
Posted by Lsujacket66 on 9/28/26 at 10:53 am to Lsujacket66
Also… on the bright side we have a 27 yr old Chase Young… hopefully we lock him up long term after his contract is up.
Loading Twitter/X Embed...
If tweet fails to load, click here.re: Post week 3 NFL draft wants/needs
Posted by Lsujacket66 on 9/28/26 at 10:50 am to WicKed WayZ
quote:
Edge By far and away our biggest issue. DT is next. Then OL depth. Fuaga had a good game. Banks will be good but they need depth. And a Guard
I wouldn’t mind drafting a tackle/guard in the 3rd rd simply as a depth piece to have a higher quality backup when inevitably someone gets injured.
I really believe Wright is the future at RG… just don’t know if we cut Ruiz or not after this year
Popular
4












