- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
LSU Freshman and ankle-monitored friend arrested for attempted Second-Degree murder
Posted on 5/7/26 at 3:08 pm
Posted on 5/7/26 at 3:08 pm
Teen accused of ambushing a kid off a Baton Rouge area school bus was on an ankle monitor
I hope this shite gets passed and has a retroactive date on it. Welcome to LSU!
I hope this shite gets passed and has a retroactive date on it. Welcome to LSU!
quote:
The Senate altered a bill Wednesday night to expand who can be charged with first-degree murder in Louisiana, citing April's mass shooting at the Mall of Louisiana as the reason for the change. With little debate and no opposition, the chamber approved an amendment to House Bill 102 that revises the definition of first-degree murder, an offense that can carry the death penalty, to include killings carried out in public places where at least three people were at risk of great harm. It would further add killings committed with illegally-possessed firearms and those committed by defendants out on bail, probation or parole.
This post was edited on 5/7/26 at 3:10 pm
Posted on 5/7/26 at 3:23 pm to MintBerry Crunch
What kind of trash is LSU letting in to campus? The President needs to do something about that. No way this guy had the ACT score and his IQ is probably lower than his ACT score.
LSU has had too many woke Presidents in the past for this to be cleared up in one or two years.
LSU has had too many woke Presidents in the past for this to be cleared up in one or two years.
Posted on 5/7/26 at 3:29 pm to MintBerry Crunch
First Degree already covers multiple murders committed in one act. Not sure how that change makes a difference. The others make sense though.
Posted on 5/7/26 at 3:33 pm to jbgleason
quote:
First Degree already covers multiple murders committed in one act.
This is a single murder and then multiple people capable of being murdered. Basically it’s trying to put any public shooting as first degree.
Posted on 5/7/26 at 3:34 pm to jbgleason
quote:
First Degree already covers multiple murders committed in one act.
Judging by the context of the mall shooting. Shooting up a place where you could have killed 3 or more people will get you first degree murder. You don't have to kill them.
And I am for it. Just because you have shite aim doesn't get you off the death penalty.
Posted on 5/7/26 at 3:37 pm to TigerDCC11
Yea, they eliminated ACT requirements, and immediately fell into chaos with on campus shootings and "block parties".
Posted on 5/7/26 at 3:44 pm to MintBerry Crunch
quote:
About a week prior, on April 29, Williams was arrested by the U.S. Marshals Service Fugitive Task Force on aggravated assault of a dating partner. According to arrest records, he tried to hit his girlfriend at his uncle's house in Baker. East Baton Rouge Parish deputies responded to the house in response to shots being fired during the evening of April 23.
Posted on 5/7/26 at 3:44 pm to MintBerry Crunch
quote:
and those committed by defendants out on bail, probation or parole.
frick yeah
Posted on 5/7/26 at 3:47 pm to boosiebadazz
Tough day for justice reform advocates
Posted on 5/7/26 at 3:56 pm to theliontamer
Yeah, I know.
That's why they need to bring back ACT requirements to enter. However, the LSU administration is more about quantity of students instead of quality of students.
That's why they need to bring back ACT requirements to enter. However, the LSU administration is more about quantity of students instead of quality of students.
Posted on 5/7/26 at 3:59 pm to MintBerry Crunch
quote:Hell yes!
It would further add killings committed with illegally-possessed firearms and those committed by defendants out on bail, probation or parole.
Honestly, any violent crime committed with a firearm should be minimum 25 years to life.
I can already hear the progressive Democrat gnashing of teeth.
This post was edited on 5/7/26 at 4:00 pm
Posted on 5/7/26 at 4:01 pm to dgnx6
quote:
Judging by the context of the mall shooting. Shooting up a place where you could have killed 3 or more people will get you first degree murder. You don't have to kill them.
Yes and no. This is the relevant subsection:
quote:
(3) When the offender has a specific intent to kill or to inflict great bodily harm upon more than one person.
You don’t have to successfully kill multiple people, but do you do have to at minimum want to shoot multiple people. Trying to shoot one person and accidentally hitting multiple bystanders wouldn’t fall under that provision, as it would lack specific intent.
Posted on 5/7/26 at 4:05 pm to MintBerry Crunch
I was confused as shite for a minute, as the original bill only pertained to cruelty to the infirm, but what’s in the article was a recent amendment to the bill. This is the text:
AMENDMENT NO. 5
16 On page 2, between lines 16 and 17, insert:
17 18 19 20 21 23 24 25 26 27 29 30 31 34 35 36 "(8) When the offender has specific intent to kill or to inflict great bodily
harm and the offense is committed in any of the following circumstances:
(a) When there has been issued by a judge or magistrate any lawful order
prohibiting contact between the offender and the victim in response to threats of
physical violence or harm which was served on the offender and is in effect at the
22 time of the homicide.
(b) When the offender, while released on bail, on probation, or under parole
supervision, commits the offense in violation of a specific restriction or condition
imposed by the court, the committee on parole, or by law.
(c) When a firearm is used in committing the offense and the offender was
prohibited by law from possessing a firearm at the time of the offense.
28 * * *
(13) When offender has specific intent to kill or to inflict great bodily harm
upon a victim who is in a public place and the offender knowingly creates a risk of
death or great bodily harm to three or more persons.
32 * * *
33 B. * * *
(5) For the purposes of Subsection A of this Section, there shall be a
rebuttable presumption that the act of pointing and discharging a firearm at another
human being constitutes specific intent to kill or to inflict great bodily harm upon
37 that person.
Eta: link because that copied/pasted ugly: LINK
AMENDMENT NO. 5
16 On page 2, between lines 16 and 17, insert:
17 18 19 20 21 23 24 25 26 27 29 30 31 34 35 36 "(8) When the offender has specific intent to kill or to inflict great bodily
harm and the offense is committed in any of the following circumstances:
(a) When there has been issued by a judge or magistrate any lawful order
prohibiting contact between the offender and the victim in response to threats of
physical violence or harm which was served on the offender and is in effect at the
22 time of the homicide.
(b) When the offender, while released on bail, on probation, or under parole
supervision, commits the offense in violation of a specific restriction or condition
imposed by the court, the committee on parole, or by law.
(c) When a firearm is used in committing the offense and the offender was
prohibited by law from possessing a firearm at the time of the offense.
28 * * *
(13) When offender has specific intent to kill or to inflict great bodily harm
upon a victim who is in a public place and the offender knowingly creates a risk of
death or great bodily harm to three or more persons.
32 * * *
33 B. * * *
(5) For the purposes of Subsection A of this Section, there shall be a
rebuttable presumption that the act of pointing and discharging a firearm at another
human being constitutes specific intent to kill or to inflict great bodily harm upon
37 that person.
Eta: link because that copied/pasted ugly: LINK
This post was edited on 5/7/26 at 4:06 pm
Posted on 5/7/26 at 4:06 pm to Scruffy
quote:
Honestly, any violent crime committed with a firearm should be minimum 25 years to life.
Slippery slope? Defending your house, as the guy jumps out the window, and you let out 1 last shot and the coroner determines that is the one that killed him. You have now killed someone, that started in self-defense, as the suspect was fleeing. I am sure there are certain DA's & judges that will throw out self-defense, under certain circumstances, and try to hit you with the minimum 25 years-to-life
Posted on 5/7/26 at 4:23 pm to Weekend Warrior79
quote:The positives outweigh the negatives.
Slippery slope? Defending your house, as the guy jumps out the window, and you let out 1 last shot and the coroner determines that is the one that killed him. You have now killed someone, that started in self-defense, as the suspect was fleeing. I am sure there are certain DA's & judges that will throw out self-defense, under certain circumstances, and try to hit you with the minimum 25 years-to-life
Would still require a jury conviction. It is a risk I would be willing to take.
Posted on 5/7/26 at 4:30 pm to MintBerry Crunch
Unfortunately this won’t change the fact that prosecutors in EBR will indict on 2nd degree murder then plea the case out to manslaughter. But it does at least help the detectives when charging suspects. A large number of murders in EBR will now fit 1st degree.
Posted on 5/7/26 at 8:33 pm to theliontamer
LSU will pay whatever it takes for coaches and NIL players to win National Championships, but does not want to do the same to have a Top Tier Academic University. What a terrible way to run the supposedly Flagship state university. Insanity.
Posted on 5/7/26 at 8:40 pm to LeGrosChat
Has it been released anywhere that one was an LSU student? I haven't seen that yet.
I imagine that LSU is doing its best to squash that if true
I imagine that LSU is doing its best to squash that if true
Posted on 5/7/26 at 8:50 pm to Dingeaux
quote:
Has it been released anywhere that one was an LSU student? I haven't seen that yet.
The article at the link in the OP states that they told the judge that Cameron Williams goes to LSU.
quote:
Williams and his two cousins allegedly drove to where the Northeast High School student was getting off a school bus and shot him. They fled the scene and were stopped by police shortly after and arrested.
Cameron Williams, 19, and Kriston Williams, 18, were each arrested for a count of principal to attempted second-degree murder. They were booked into East Baton Rouge Parish prison and have a $100,000 bond set.
All three told the judge on Wednesday that they are in school, and that Cameron Williams is a freshman at LSU.
Popular
Back to top


13









