View in: Desktop
Copyright @2019 TigerDroppings.com. All rights reserved.
- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Coaching Changes
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Posted by
Message
re: Q: p5023: Q is back... - Unraveling ToE ThreadPosted by boomtown143
on 12/2/19 at 7:54 pm to VoxDawg

quote:
Never forget, Dec 2015. That's when this shite was hatched.
Do we have texts from those 2 that go that far back??
Strzok/Page were wayy to open in just the texts we've seen that they would HAVE talked about it over texts/emails....they never thought she would lose.
It's still hard to believe that if they were texting/emailing a coup that they would still be denying they were planning one.
This post was edited on 12/2 at 7:56 pm
re: Q: p5023: Q is back... - Unraveling ToE ThreadPosted by VoxDawg
on 12/2/19 at 7:58 pm to boomtown143

Excellent question. I don't think I've ever looked for the text records, outright.
re: Q: p5023: Q is back... - Unraveling ToE ThreadPosted by boomtown143
on 12/2/19 at 8:06 pm to VoxDawg

quote:
Excellent question. I don't think I've ever looked for the text records, outright.
Not saying they would have been talking that early anyway. If 2015 were the beginning...then Brennan et al would have been planning then so it probably wouldn't have gotten to Strzok/Page by then.
But also...we have to remember... they were communicating over Playstation or something like that also
re: Q: p5023: Q is back... - Unraveling ToE ThreadPosted by Speckhunter2012
on 12/2/19 at 8:10 pm to boomtown143

quote:
Do we have texts from those 2 that go that far back??
Maybe not "we" as in you, me and the public, but it has been said many times by Q, IIRC, and even the last week or two by PDJT that "We Have It All! We caught them." I think the ones that need it have it.
However, as far as for use in ongoing investigations and 4th Amendment issues? I don't know how much may be used in a court of Law.
I don't want to break the law to catch the lawbreakers. That has been my personal dilemma throughout this Great Awakening.
I think what is taking so long is that the White Hats want to do this legally, unlike their Deep State counterparts who trampled on our Sacred Bill of Rights to "get" PDJT and any other political opponent.
If FISA goes both ways, maybe they do have it all and can use it legally? I know we all hope so.
re: Q: p5023: Q is back... - Unraveling ToE ThreadPosted by boomtown143
on 12/2/19 at 8:16 pm to Speckhunter2012

quote:
I don't want to break the law to catch the lawbreakers. That has been my personal dilemma throughout this Great Awakening.
You really don't have to break the law. Hell, I don't see how hard it would be to get a FISA 1 on most of the people based on just what we know. If that were the case...you would have every single communication they've ever made.
Q does say "FISA goes both ways".
I don't see how the FBI couldn't go to the FISA courts just based on what they found internally and say "look at this...they were plotting a coup...BOOM FISA". No FISA judge...seeing just the evidence we know about would say no...IT WAS A COUP
But I get what you're saying..
This post was edited on 12/2 at 8:19 pm
re: Q: p5023: Q is back... - Unraveling ToE ThreadPosted by LakeCharles on 12/2/19 at 8:38 pm to boomtown143
quote:
It's still hard to believe that if they were texting/emailing a coup that they would still be denying they were planning one.
These people are stupid.
re: Q: p5023: Q is back... - Unraveling ToE ThreadPosted by rphtx
on 12/2/19 at 8:43 pm to DreauxB2015

The spray has been off the hook in central texas starting back a few months ago.
re: Q: p5023: Q is back... - Unraveling ToE ThreadPosted by boomtown143
on 12/2/19 at 8:44 pm to LakeCharles

quote:
These people are stupid.
Either
1. They know Horrowitz or whomever hasn't found them
2. They don't know Horrowitz or whomever has found them
Biggest problem is that it seems like no one has flipped....
re: Q: p5023: Q is back... - Unraveling ToE ThreadPosted by tigersandsaints
on 12/2/19 at 9:47 pm to tigersandsaints

Paul Sperry
@paulsperry_
·
3m
"Schiff is reluctant to release [IC IG Atkinson's] testimony because it will further expose the fraudulent nature of the whistleblower’s claim. It will disclose the interaction between he and/or his staff and the whistleblower."
redstate article
@paulsperry_
·
3m
"Schiff is reluctant to release [IC IG Atkinson's] testimony because it will further expose the fraudulent nature of the whistleblower’s claim. It will disclose the interaction between he and/or his staff and the whistleblower."
redstate article
re: Q: p5023: Q is back... - Unraveling ToE ThreadPosted by LakeCharles on 12/2/19 at 9:56 pm to Speckhunter2012
quote:
as far as for use in ongoing investigations and 4th Amendment issues? I don't know how much may be used in a court of Law.
Once it is proven that foreign organizations were involved and multiple people were involved in trying to remove a sitting President, an attempted coup is proven. It can be turned over to military justice to prosecute and "execute" with somewhat more discretion in how and what evidence is entered into court.
re: Q: p5023: Q is back... - Unraveling ToE ThreadPosted by tigersandsaints
on 12/2/19 at 10:00 pm to tigersandsaints

Paul Sperry
@paulsperry_
·
1m
BREAKING: Rep. Ratcliffe of intel committee said Schiff has classified as "SECRET" the transcript of the critical 8-hour Oct 4 testimony of IC IG Atkinson, the Obama holdover who bent rules to certify the "whistleblower's" second-hand complaint and to slip it into Schiff's hands
re: Q: p5023: Q is back... - Unraveling ToE ThreadPosted by tigersandsaints
on 12/2/19 at 10:05 pm to tigersandsaints

stormypatriotjoe??????
@stormypatriot21
·
1h
Military tweets getting more and more direct with Q drops.
.
@USArmy
today "Fire in the hole"
Q 976 "Fire in the hole" 3/28/18
Link in Q post leads us to the news that is about to hit on Lisa Page
Future Proves Past
#QAnon #MAGA #WWG1WGA
H/T
@LibbyFreeman17
@brinajustb

@stormypatriot21
·
1h
Military tweets getting more and more direct with Q drops.
.
@USArmy
today "Fire in the hole"
Q 976 "Fire in the hole" 3/28/18
Link in Q post leads us to the news that is about to hit on Lisa Page
Future Proves Past
#QAnon #MAGA #WWG1WGA
H/T
@LibbyFreeman17
@brinajustb
re: Q: p5023: Q is back... - Unraveling ToE ThreadPosted by JadeSea on 12/2/19 at 10:08 pm to tigersandsaints
Interesting find on Voat re: Melania's Christmas video, Scrabble, domino
-----
CAREFULLY check out the video and pay special attention.
The Spirit of America
https://twitter.com/FLOTUS/status/1201351943790174208
0:01 mark - Doors
0:28 mark - Domino
See anything special?
Look at what CBS News did with same vid.
https://twitter.com/CBSNews/status/1201360370016935936
CBS News cropped out version
-----
CBS reposted it cropping out the doors at the beginning (1-7) and also completely cropping out the #17 domino. Voat-ers asking why a major news organization would want to crop out those clues?
-----
CAREFULLY check out the video and pay special attention.
The Spirit of America
https://twitter.com/FLOTUS/status/1201351943790174208
0:01 mark - Doors
0:28 mark - Domino
See anything special?
Look at what CBS News did with same vid.
https://twitter.com/CBSNews/status/1201360370016935936
CBS News cropped out version
-----
CBS reposted it cropping out the doors at the beginning (1-7) and also completely cropping out the #17 domino. Voat-ers asking why a major news organization would want to crop out those clues?
re: Q: p5023: Q is back... - Unraveling ToE ThreadPosted by boomtown143
on 12/2/19 at 10:39 pm to LakeCharles

quote:
Once it is proven that foreign organizations were involved and multiple people were involved in trying to remove a sitting President, an attempted coup is proven. It can be turned over to military justice to prosecute and "execute"
This never even crossed my mind!!
so that's how the military tribunals would come about....dang.
re: Q: p5023: Q is back... - Unraveling ToE ThreadPosted by BoarEd
on 12/2/19 at 11:25 pm to boomtown143

Here is an interesting Twitter twat.
LINK
quote:
Q 100% CONFIRMED BY TRUMP! Every single letter including capitalization & punctuation from Q's new tripcode !!Hs1Jq13jV6 (except the "q") can be found in Trump's confirmation tweet from exactly 1 minute later. The odds of this happening accidentally are billions to one.
LINK
I think MI6 was there the night of the meeting between Lisa Page and company and took the pictures, video, and audio. Perhaps they were tailing high value American assets wondering just why they were meeting in London. The current CIA head was also the head of the London field office at the time. Perhaps she was the one good cat of the bunch and tipped off MI6? Considering the GCHQ head quit abruptly after Trump won the presidency, it seems fitting that MI6 had the goods the whole time on the entire operation. They would be the only branch who would have a reason for being there and wouldn't be looking the other way.
GCHQ and MI6 are different branches of British Intelligence
So here's my theory, GCHQ became dirty as pointed out with Q's post about the movie Official Secrets. They were totally fine with working lock and step with the American Deep State to make sure the officials responsible for starting the war in Iraq were strong armed to do so.
MI6's main goals are to stop terrorism, drug trafficking and ensuring regional stability. It would make perfect sense that they would be interested in Lisa Page and company's meeting in London. It's pretty bold to say the least that Lisa and company would have such a high value meeting in London so perhaps Page was a double agent. It would make sense why she was shagging all these blokes in top level positions. She was aiming at infiltration. GCHQ much like the CIA was compromised so they would look the other way, but MI6 would be a different story.
NSA thanks to Mike Rogers was of course not, so they hand over the text messages and other info related to the investigation of the high level meeting and the dots are easily connected. I could go either way on her being a double agent, but one thing's for sure, MI6 had the goods from day one and were there the night of with pictures, video, and audio for sure. No way they would allow a meeting like that on their soil without knowing damn well what was said and who was there.
While everyone was talking about Barr's trip to Italy (me included) we totally missed his travels to London. I'm guessing he and Durham were handed the direct evidence of the meeting that occurred in London. No way they would transmit that. It would have to be handed over directly.
Barr Travels to London
Keep in mind that Horowitz would not have access to these materials as he is only looking at the inner workings of the United States. He would be looking at only half of the story. This is why Durham and Barr are so important and why their travels to London, Italy and Australia are so important. It also lends credence that while Horowitz will have uncovered some unhealthy actions, the motives would be lost as they occurred outside Horowitz's scope. Enter MI6 to provide exactly that motive, throw in some direct evidence, some broth, a potato and baby you've got a stew going!
GCHQ and MI6 are different branches of British Intelligence
So here's my theory, GCHQ became dirty as pointed out with Q's post about the movie Official Secrets. They were totally fine with working lock and step with the American Deep State to make sure the officials responsible for starting the war in Iraq were strong armed to do so.
MI6's main goals are to stop terrorism, drug trafficking and ensuring regional stability. It would make perfect sense that they would be interested in Lisa Page and company's meeting in London. It's pretty bold to say the least that Lisa and company would have such a high value meeting in London so perhaps Page was a double agent. It would make sense why she was shagging all these blokes in top level positions. She was aiming at infiltration. GCHQ much like the CIA was compromised so they would look the other way, but MI6 would be a different story.
NSA thanks to Mike Rogers was of course not, so they hand over the text messages and other info related to the investigation of the high level meeting and the dots are easily connected. I could go either way on her being a double agent, but one thing's for sure, MI6 had the goods from day one and were there the night of with pictures, video, and audio for sure. No way they would allow a meeting like that on their soil without knowing damn well what was said and who was there.
While everyone was talking about Barr's trip to Italy (me included) we totally missed his travels to London. I'm guessing he and Durham were handed the direct evidence of the meeting that occurred in London. No way they would transmit that. It would have to be handed over directly.
Barr Travels to London
Keep in mind that Horowitz would not have access to these materials as he is only looking at the inner workings of the United States. He would be looking at only half of the story. This is why Durham and Barr are so important and why their travels to London, Italy and Australia are so important. It also lends credence that while Horowitz will have uncovered some unhealthy actions, the motives would be lost as they occurred outside Horowitz's scope. Enter MI6 to provide exactly that motive, throw in some direct evidence, some broth, a potato and baby you've got a stew going!
This post was edited on 12/3 at 12:12 am
Popular
Special night for Orgeron family.
Back to top
