Favorite team:USA 
Location:
Biography:
Interests:
Occupation:
Number of Posts:10285
Registered on:10/24/2020
Online Status:
 Online

Recent Posts

Message
quote:

You think the globalists give a damn about your opinion? What you don’t get is globalism cannot move forward with the U.S. in its current form. Remember “fundamentally change this country”?


The problem I see (as evidenced by some of the replies to this thread), is many Americans still have their heads shoved up their arse. They tip toe around the subject of race and immigration, but let’s be honest what we all want is an America that looks more like 1950. People will use some ambiguous language to dance around what they mean by that, but when the rubber meets the road, Americans want to live with Americans. They don’t want their children going to schools with interpreters and they don’t want 5 Guatemalan families living in the same house together next door and the neighbors across the street worshiping elephants

quote:

OP hates minorities


Nope. I don’t harbor hate for anyone, even people who hate me and my family, I don’t hate

But I do prefer to share a country and community with certain people over other people

Which is no different than I prefer to live in the same house with my family, and not anyone else.

I like my extended family being near by to, I like living near my parents and siblings, and friends I grew up with.

This is extremely normal human behavior. A lot of Americans have been brainwashed post-MLK into believing these thoughts are bad.
quote:

Freedom of religion but not in my back yard.


No one cares about your lame-arse douchey libertarian talking points from 2013.

We don’t want Muslims, Hindus, pagans, and hordes of foreigners occupying our neighborhoods, schools, hospitals, etc. whatever system stops that, is the system people are going to want.

The system isn’t the point. This is what boomers don’t get. They always push the system for the system’s sake as if that’s some sort of virtue or something we should aspire to. People want to know what the fruits of said system will produce. The hyper neo-liberal globalist anti-human style capitalism that has been pushed is not producing the desired fruits for the younger generations that it may have initially produced for some of the older generations.

Of course, in a vacuum free markets and capitalism is great. But it has to serve some good ends. Capitalism should serve the people of the country, the people should not be subservient to capitalism.
quote:

That sounds like DEI by another name. You want to pay more money for a less educated employee. You are replacing, "Go woke, go broke" with "Go Bob, go broke."


This is what multiculturalism leads to. All the tribes will eventually just extract as much resources as possible for their own. White people are still drinking the MLK koolaid, but it’s wearing off.

Also, Bob is not playing on an even playing field. We all know there is unlimited red tape and regulations that affect our own people that seem to bypass foreigners in all sorts of ways




And if that means we need to pay Bob with the community college tech degree an extra $25k to work a tech job then so be it.

I’d rather my kids grow up with Bob’s kids going to Church and school together than Haresh’s kids worshiping their monkey demon gods

Trump and boomers just don’t get it. They think we are all just obsessed with hyper efficiency and market growth at all costs. And we should sacrifice our children’s future at the alter of these idols so they can go on more cruises in their 70s
If you are on this train, a few things you would have to consider before stepping in:

Women in NYC voted for Mandami at 85%, and Kamala something like 95%+
She almost certainly voted for this

You step in to defend her and restrain this fat slob, he may stab or shoot you (it’s illegal for you to carry). Or even if you are successful in restraining him, you will be prosecuted facing a long prison sentence. If you have children, that means depriving your children of their father for a long time or even their lifetime.

Should men be chivalrous and protective to random women when they have “equal rights” and can vote certain ways that makes being protective of them more difficult? It seems women want their cake (voting and equal rights) and want to eat it too (be protected and taken care of)


Loading Twitter/X Embed...
If tweet fails to load, click here.
Not a fan of Fuentes, but not because of his opinions on Israel or race. But he has a history of saying really weird and fricked up shite for clickbait, that often is just deranged. Recently going after Erika Kirk, and previously telling Kirk how he fricked him.

I simply don’t want to associate with someone like that. Not pearl clutching, just choosing not to listen to to some little autistic dweeb like him.
quote:

Getting rid of millions of people who don't want to leave is going to take much longer than letting them walk across the border like the previous dipshit did.


It should be incredibly easy.
Cut off resources and incentives for them to be here.
This would be fairly easy to do and would immediately result in 10+ million deportations

“No more ER visits, freed public education, EBT, housing”

Then prosecute employers for hiring them
Would love DeSantis in the role of AG
He has that autistic (in a good way) sort of nature to him that makes him obsessed with delivering results
Getting the gangbangers is nice, but only a minor issue in the grand scheme of things

They are buying homes in middle class neighborhoods and moving 5 families into them.

The men are working 80 hours a week on roofing and landscaping crews getting paid under the table (shared homes is helping with childcare)

And they are absolutely racking up free healthcare, education, and food supplements

Even volunteering at my local Catholic diocese food pantry is depressing. It’s all immigrant families coming in. Not down on their luck Americans

And region? With citrus season coming up, looking to expand my horizons with different varieties. I have become fond of tangelos if and when I can find them in their peak (usually December/January)
Voting and political activism is the equivalent to Church, worship, and receiving the sacraments to liberals.

re: Jay Jones

Posted by burger bearcat on 11/6/25 at 8:28 am to
quote:

Blue know matter who.


Make fun of it all you want, but Democrats understand the stakes. Ultimately you build the coalition around something and everyone moves forward no looking back

You have to win. Losing is not a solution

Jay Jones

Posted by burger bearcat on 11/5/25 at 9:44 pm
I guarantee you Democrat Underground and Bluesky were not melting down for weeks on end about whether Democrats should have supported Jay Jones even after wishing death on innocent children and families.

Democrats just want to win and do whatever it takes to win. Republicans are nothing but a bunch of beautiful losers.
quote:

Unfortunately, there is a calamitous flaw in the US constitution.


The Constitution is simply a piece of parchment written a few hundred years ago. It really isn’t anything more than that. Many other countries including Canada, Mexico, Liberia, Guatemala, and others adopted the exact same or almost the same Constitution. Look where they are now

The Constitution is written on the hearts of the people who make up the country. It will take on a life of its own from there and go whichever direction it needs to, the dusty document has no power in of itself if the people don’t adhere to it.

The original Constitution does not work with mass immigration, universal suffrage, women voting, welfare recipients voting, etc.
quote:

SlowFlowPro


Just because I am recognizing a reality does not mean I agree with it in principle. To some degree all politics is always transactional. With a higher IQ, close knit, homogeneous and high trust, moral population… you can focus more on ideology and culture building and less away from fractional politics… in a mass scale diverse population… it is all transactional. Thats just the reality.

This is why we should try to go away from universal suffrage and mass scale diversity. So we could possibly have a government that truly looks like the one we were intended to have. But with the demographics reality of our electorate, that is not possible. It simply becomes a race to the bottom on who can extract out the most resources from the remaining husk.
quote:

You mean like when Trump promised free IVF for everybody? Or when he promised health insurance that would cover everybody but still cost less?


I don’t agree with this stuff in principle, especially anything promoting IVF. But Trump recognizes the transactional nature of politics much better than most Republicans.

Bow tie libertarian dorks are too busy sniffing each others farts caught up in their abstract theories that only
people with 100+ IQs can grasp or appreciate. How does that work when you have to appeal to mostly sub 80 IQ voters?

Either figure out a way to massively restrict suffrage and voting rights to a more qualified electorate or get used to buying off voting blocks with cheap promises and freebies. There is no middle ground. 80 IQ foreigners aren’t reading John Locke and your Cato institute white papers.
It’s all about block voting. Win the voter blocks, win elections. To win the voter blocks, pay off the block community leaders. No one in 2025 is coming to the other side because of a persuasive debate.

The Democrats have no shame or limiting principles. They are fine promising the world to their voting blocks, whether it materializes or not.

The conservative side is arguing and making their pitch on principle and ideology. Which is much more abstract to the average voter. This is only going to be effective to 100+ IQ voters. The average IQ of foreigners being imported is in the 70-80 range.

Republicans only chance is to figure out how to secure 52% of the voter blocks, and how to weaken/neuter the other 48% as much as possible.

Shut off all federal funds to NYC

Posted by burger bearcat on 11/5/25 at 12:58 pm
I would shut off everything except anything specifically pertaining to national security and trade interests (ports, bridges, etc)

If NYC wants to have their own little commie Petri dish, it should not be done on the backs of regular middle of the country Americans.

Stop overthinking it. See previous post covering it. Demographics is destiny, Democrats played the game with some weak Republicans and now we are stuck in it.

Democrats give out free shite and citizenship in exchange for votes

How are we supposed to compete against that when their voters are comprised of sub 80 IQ foreigners?

Why people vote Democrat