
- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Clancy trial verdict predictions
Posted on 9/1/26 at 5:54 pm to rt3
Posted on 9/1/26 at 5:54 pm to rt3
If anyone knows someone with psychosis and/or bipolar disorder, they truly lose reality at times. Fairly often. The fact that this happened once… exactly when she sent off her husband… when she calculated the time he’d be gone…
She’s a fricking liar. Women are so damn easily manipulated by emotions. Just claim victimhood over anything and they have to sympathize. Repeal the 19th.
She’s a fricking liar. Women are so damn easily manipulated by emotions. Just claim victimhood over anything and they have to sympathize. Repeal the 19th.
This post was edited on 9/1/26 at 5:55 pm
Posted on 9/1/26 at 5:55 pm to loogaroo
Where the frick are the decent women leaders calling out the Clancy supporters?
Are all women secretly hoping this gives them an out of a situation they don't like (parenting) without spending their lives in jail for murder?
Are all women secretly hoping this gives them an out of a situation they don't like (parenting) without spending their lives in jail for murder?
Posted on 9/1/26 at 5:56 pm to forkedintheroad
They are hoping they can extend abortion and “women’s rights” into childhood, apparently
This post was edited on 9/1/26 at 5:57 pm
Posted on 9/1/26 at 6:07 pm to Ingeniero
quote:This is the most ridiculous part and why we need to brace ourselves even if there are no mentally ill Karens on this jury or a retrial jury
The fact that their NGRI procedure is that you can throw it out there and now someone has to prove you were NOT insane?
Proving beyond reasonable doubt that someone isn’t insane is essentially impossible because we can’t be in other people’s head. We don’t even all have the same definition of insanity
Conviction almost inherently requires explicit evidence that simply doesn’t exist in most cases. Things like a trail of the plan for pleading insanity being concocted, chats with an AI model on how to pull it off, etc. Both examples of which can be easily hidden/destroyed
The problem is there is an extremely high probability of at least 1 juror who wants to put her away but can’t bring him/herself to say it’s not insanity beyond reasonable doubt. Not because they don’t think it’s likely bullshite, but because that nearly impossible standard just hasn’t been met. Under those circumstances many principled people can’t bring themselves to convict someone for life
A principled person sticking purely to the facts of the case and actual law is normally a great thing, but when the law is awful it’s a recipe for injustice. Feels like that’s where this is headed
This post was edited on 9/2/26 at 12:23 am
Posted on 9/1/26 at 7:23 pm to loogaroo
quote:
“Abortion can be another word for mercy.”
You mean like assisted suicide is another word for mercy?
Yeah thought so. Slippery slope wins again. Many if us told you we'd get here, even with abortionin "serious circumstances,"
Human life has a limited value.
Posted on 9/1/26 at 7:55 pm to Freauxzen
Why is the Tik Tok coven defending Clancy but not Laken Snelling? Laken Snelling was the UK cheerleader that birthed her child and then put it in a dumpster (or something) to die.
Also, why wouldn't Snelling be contesting for another trial and just claim she had PPD or PPP ?
Also, why wouldn't Snelling be contesting for another trial and just claim she had PPD or PPP ?
Posted on 9/1/26 at 8:01 pm to forkedintheroad
quote:
Where the frick are the decent women leaders calling out the Clancy supporters?
There's been a few women influencers calling them out. The problem is there just isn't enough of them doing it to truly counteract the insanity. So many women apparently are straight up psychotic.
Posted on 9/1/26 at 8:54 pm to Bobby OG Johnson
Loading Twitter/X Embed...
If tweet fails to load, click here.This post was edited on 9/1/26 at 8:56 pm
Posted on 9/1/26 at 9:51 pm to Tigerbait357
quote:
BREAKING: A 56-year-old woman has been arrested for JURY INTIMIDATION after she CHASED DOWN and PHOTOGRAPHED Lindsay Clancy jurors following their dismissal today
This brain-rot is OUT OF CONTROL. RE-OPEN THE ASYLUMS.
Dawn Light is now facing SERIOUS felonies in the state of Massachusetts, and is currently in jail, waiting to see a judge in the morning.
Loading Twitter/X Embed...
If tweet fails to load, click here.Posted on 9/1/26 at 10:01 pm to forkedintheroad
quote:not on tik tok
Where the frick are the decent women
Posted on 9/1/26 at 10:58 pm to High C
quote:
I wasn’t defending him by any means. I posted it to point out the obvious double standard.
I know. I just didn't want to miss an opportunity to highlight that evil.
Posted on 9/2/26 at 1:32 am to LegendInMyMind
2 dudes are in a car. Lifelong friends. Car wrecks and passenger dies. Drivers's blood alcohol readings prove & provide undisputed evidence that he factually was not in his right state of mind at the time of the crash. Off to jail he goes.
Posted on 9/2/26 at 3:28 am to ShrimperDan
quote:
They think they can throw her in a psych facility, get the same outcome (at least in their mind), and they can sleep good at night. The reality is she will be on the streets again if she gets in a psych facility with a not guilty verdict.
Well, fortunately for innocent lives she’s paralyzed from the waist down. Half of the threat is neutralized.
Posted on 9/2/26 at 4:12 am to 3D
quote:
2 dudes are in a car. Lifelong friends. Car wrecks and passenger dies. Drivers's blood alcohol readings prove & provide undisputed evidence that he factually was not in his right state of mind at the time of the crash. Off to jail he goes.
Let’s say husband walks in right after she kills the kids and let’s say he loses it and kills his wife. And then at his trial his attorney argues that he simply lost it when he saw the scene, he can’t even remember what he did. Heat of passion, psychosis, whatever you want to call it.
The ladies defending the wife in this case would want him to fry and wouldn’t think twice about the double standard.
Posted on 9/2/26 at 6:42 am to Sus-Scrofa
quote:
Let’s say husband walks in right after she kills the kids and let’s say he loses it and kills his wife. And then at his trial his attorney argues that he simply lost it when he saw the scene, he can’t even remember what he did. Heat of passion, psychosis, whatever you want to call it.
I think he ends up at Shutter Island
Posted on 9/2/26 at 6:47 am to Sus-Scrofa
quote:
Let’s say husband walks in right after she kills the kids and let’s say he loses it and kills his wife. And then at his trial his attorney argues that he simply lost it when he saw the scene, he can’t even remember what he did. Heat of passion, psychosis, whatever you want to call it.
Would have been the best outcome for all parties. No trial and no hormonal defense sees the light of day.
Posted on 9/2/26 at 8:14 am to 9Fiddy
My thoughts on this is any juror that votes NG for this psycho should have to allow clancy to baby sit their kids
Posted on 9/2/26 at 8:20 am to Keith13
quote:What a weak ridiculous emotionally stunted statement
My thoughts on this is any juror that votes NG for this psycho should have to allow clancy to baby sit their kids
Some of y’all are just as emotional as women
Posted on 9/2/26 at 8:28 am to RemouladeSawce
quote:You hit the nail on the head here. Bravo
The problem is there is an extremely high probability of at least 1 juror who wants to put her away but can’t bring him/herself to say it’s not insanity beyond reasonable doubt. Not because they don’t think it’s likely bullshite, but because that nearly impossible standard just hasn’t been met. Under those circumstances many principled people can’t bring themselves to convict someone for life A principled person sticking purely to the facts of the case and actual law is normally a great thing, but when the law is awful it’s a recipe for injustice. Feels like that’s where this is headed
Posted on 9/2/26 at 8:54 am to lsupride87

Popular
Back to top


0











