Started By
Message

re: Clancy trial verdict predictions

Posted on 9/2/26 at 10:42 am to
Posted by forkedintheroad
Member since Feb 2025
3138 posts
Posted on 9/2/26 at 10:42 am to
Judge should lose his seat for not sequestering. Either deliberate jury corruption or an absolute dumbass.
Posted by MFn GIMP
Member since Feb 2011
23183 posts
Posted on 9/2/26 at 10:49 am to
quote:

Judge should lose his seat for not sequestering. Either deliberate jury corruption or an absolute dumbass.

IIRC it's pretty rare for a jury, in a trial this long, to be sequestered. Should they have been? Probably but doing so curtails your jury pool even more because the majority of people can't be away from their families and kids for 3+ weeks.

With that said this was always going to be a hung jury because of the young women on the jury and the state did a horrible job up until the closing statement. In a retrial hopefully the state does a better job and narrows the focus a bit.
Posted by beebefootballfan
Member since Mar 2011
21185 posts
Posted on 9/2/26 at 11:00 am to
New note from the jury room today will probably say....

We are unable to reach a verdict and continue to be deadlocked. We need to get mani and pedi's as we have been stuck here for 3 weeks and unable to maintain our appearance. Please declare mistrial immediately.

Sincerely,
The Liberal Karen Club
Posted by rt3
now in the piney woods of Pineville
Member since Apr 2011
148490 posts
Posted on 9/2/26 at 11:22 am to
quote:

IIRC it's pretty rare for a jury, in a trial this long, to be sequestered. Should they have been? Probably but doing so curtails your jury pool even more because the majority of people can't be away from their families and kids for 3+ weeks.

Some juries are sequestered only during deliberations

Seems like a great way to get 12 people to reach a decision
Posted by RLDSC FAN
Rancho Cucamonga, CA
Member since Nov 2008
62005 posts
Posted on 9/2/26 at 11:26 am to
Posted by 3D
NJ
Member since Sep 2013
1603 posts
Posted on 9/2/26 at 11:46 am to
jury making demands too & wanna leave early
Posted by MemphisGuy
Germantown, TN
Member since Nov 2023
15380 posts
Posted on 9/2/26 at 11:59 am to
In what frickin' universe does even one.. much less more than one... person NOT find this lady guilty of murder? How is that even possible?
Posted by MWP
Kingwood, TX via Monroe, LA
Member since Jul 2013
11378 posts
Posted on 9/2/26 at 12:27 pm to
quote:

I guess it my kid has a woman teacher from now on I need to ask if she has had a kid in the past year. If so, I'll get her moved to another classroom.


If she gets off, this is going to set women's rights back to the stone age. Employers will be able to use hormones as a valid reason to not hire a women that just had a kid and use this case as a precedent.
Posted by ShrimperDan
Fernandina
Member since Jul 2026
489 posts
Posted on 9/2/26 at 12:35 pm to
A woman in Illinois killed her 2 year old then tried to kill herself last night.

This world is so lost.
Posted by JohnnyKilroy
Cajun Navy Vice Admiral
Member since Oct 2012
42387 posts
Posted on 9/2/26 at 12:35 pm to
quote:

Would have been the best outcome for all parties. No trial and no hormonal defense sees the light of day.



Lol 100% chance that he would be arrested, tried (and probably convicted) of the murder of the kids as well in that case.
Posted by LSUFanHouston
NOLA
Member since Jul 2009
42158 posts
Posted on 9/2/26 at 1:08 pm to
My guess is murder 1 is off the table and murder 2 probably is

Maybe they get manslaughter but my guess is a hung jury

If any one thinks she was insane, or might have been insane, they are not going to sign off on any charge.
Posted by ShrimperDan
Fernandina
Member since Jul 2026
489 posts
Posted on 9/2/26 at 1:20 pm to
quote:

If any one thinks she was insane, or might have been insane, they are not going to sign off on any charge.



I agree but I also think people on the other side of it are just as likely to give in. I would never compromise on this case. Its first degree.
Posted by ILurkThereforeIAm
In the Shadows, Behind Hedges
Member since Aug 2020
931 posts
Posted on 9/2/26 at 1:25 pm to
Jury still hung. Court TV says "jurors look frustrated as Tuey-Rodriguez charge read." Judge sent them back to deliberate further.
Posted by KosmoCramer
Member since Dec 2007
81076 posts
Posted on 9/2/26 at 1:27 pm to
quote:

Jury still hung. Court TV says "jurors look frustrated as Tuey-Rodriguez charge read." Judge sent them back to deliberate further.


It's gonna be over soon. Mistrial 100% incoming
Posted by Fun Bunch
New Orleans
Member since May 2008
133477 posts
Posted on 9/2/26 at 1:30 pm to
Yup. You have at least 3 people not budging one way or the other.
Posted by rt3
now in the piney woods of Pineville
Member since Apr 2011
148490 posts
Posted on 9/2/26 at 1:31 pm to
quote:

Jury still hung. Court TV says "jurors look frustrated as Tuey-Rodriguez charge read." Judge sent them back to deliberate further.

Welp... that's strike 2

Strike 1... judge reads shortened Allen (or in this case Tuey-Rodriguez)

Strike 2... judge reads full Allen (Tuey-Rodriguez) Charge

If they come back again saying they're still deadlocked... Strike 3... hung jury & mistrial declared

Prep for attempt 2 at this trial
This post was edited on 9/2/26 at 1:36 pm
Posted by Fun Bunch
New Orleans
Member since May 2008
133477 posts
Posted on 9/2/26 at 1:32 pm to
It might be awhile.

But I firmly believe that the Prosecution will learn some lessons from this one and all the things they fricked up
Posted by rt3
now in the piney woods of Pineville
Member since Apr 2011
148490 posts
Posted on 9/2/26 at 1:34 pm to
quote:

It might be awhile.

But I firmly believe that the Prosecution will learn some lessons from this one and all the things they fricked up

I'd be willing to bet the Commonwealth will have a whole new line-up of experts ready to say exactly what the Commonwealth needs them to say if they go for round 2

& Dr. Mack will be blasted into the sun
This post was edited on 9/2/26 at 1:35 pm
Posted by ell_13
Member since Apr 2013
88560 posts
Posted on 9/2/26 at 1:35 pm to
The prosecution is more likely to obtain a conviction if the case actually goes to a second jury trial, though most hung-jury cases never reach a full retrial.

The best available data comes from the National Center for State Courts study Are Hung Juries a Problem? (Hannaford-Agor et al., 2002), which has been repeatedly cited in later legal scholarship.

After a hung jury:
• Only about 32% of cases were refiled for another jury trial.
• Roughly 32% ended in a guilty plea.
• About 22% were dismissed.

Of the cases that did go to a second jury trial:
• ~69–70% ended in conviction
• ~19% ended in acquittal
• ~8% hung again
• ~4% ended in another type of mistrial

Among retrials that produced a verdict, the conviction rate was therefore around 78%.
Posted by DrrTiger
Terra incognita
Member since Nov 2023
2827 posts
Posted on 9/2/26 at 1:40 pm to
quote:

The 3 men on the Lindsay Clancy jury getting ready to head back in for day 5


Can't imagine the incessant henpecking they have had to endure over the last few days. God bless them.
Jump to page
Page First 20 21 22 23 24 ... 31
Jump to page
first pageprev pagePage 22 of 31Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

Facebook•X•Instagram