
- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Coaching Changes
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Clancy trial verdict predictions
Posted on 9/2/26 at 10:42 am to tiggerthetooth
Posted on 9/2/26 at 10:42 am to tiggerthetooth
Judge should lose his seat for not sequestering. Either deliberate jury corruption or an absolute dumbass.
Posted on 9/2/26 at 10:49 am to forkedintheroad
quote:
Judge should lose his seat for not sequestering. Either deliberate jury corruption or an absolute dumbass.
IIRC it's pretty rare for a jury, in a trial this long, to be sequestered. Should they have been? Probably but doing so curtails your jury pool even more because the majority of people can't be away from their families and kids for 3+ weeks.
With that said this was always going to be a hung jury because of the young women on the jury and the state did a horrible job up until the closing statement. In a retrial hopefully the state does a better job and narrows the focus a bit.
Posted on 9/2/26 at 11:00 am to MFn GIMP
New note from the jury room today will probably say....
We are unable to reach a verdict and continue to be deadlocked. We need to get mani and pedi's as we have been stuck here for 3 weeks and unable to maintain our appearance. Please declare mistrial immediately.
Sincerely,
The Liberal Karen Club
We are unable to reach a verdict and continue to be deadlocked. We need to get mani and pedi's as we have been stuck here for 3 weeks and unable to maintain our appearance. Please declare mistrial immediately.
Sincerely,
The Liberal Karen Club
Posted on 9/2/26 at 11:22 am to MFn GIMP
quote:
IIRC it's pretty rare for a jury, in a trial this long, to be sequestered. Should they have been? Probably but doing so curtails your jury pool even more because the majority of people can't be away from their families and kids for 3+ weeks.
Some juries are sequestered only during deliberations
Seems like a great way to get 12 people to reach a decision
Posted on 9/2/26 at 11:26 am to rt3
Posted on 9/2/26 at 11:46 am to RLDSC FAN
jury making demands too & wanna leave early
Posted on 9/2/26 at 11:59 am to 3D
In what frickin' universe does even one.. much less more than one... person NOT find this lady guilty of murder? How is that even possible?
Posted on 9/2/26 at 12:27 pm to VolSquatch
quote:
I guess it my kid has a woman teacher from now on I need to ask if she has had a kid in the past year. If so, I'll get her moved to another classroom.
If she gets off, this is going to set women's rights back to the stone age. Employers will be able to use hormones as a valid reason to not hire a women that just had a kid and use this case as a precedent.
Posted on 9/2/26 at 12:35 pm to MWP
A woman in Illinois killed her 2 year old then tried to kill herself last night.
This world is so lost.
This world is so lost.
Posted on 9/2/26 at 12:35 pm to 9Fiddy
quote:
Would have been the best outcome for all parties. No trial and no hormonal defense sees the light of day.
Lol 100% chance that he would be arrested, tried (and probably convicted) of the murder of the kids as well in that case.
Posted on 9/2/26 at 1:08 pm to GeneralLee
My guess is murder 1 is off the table and murder 2 probably is
Maybe they get manslaughter but my guess is a hung jury
If any one thinks she was insane, or might have been insane, they are not going to sign off on any charge.
Maybe they get manslaughter but my guess is a hung jury
If any one thinks she was insane, or might have been insane, they are not going to sign off on any charge.
Posted on 9/2/26 at 1:20 pm to LSUFanHouston
quote:
If any one thinks she was insane, or might have been insane, they are not going to sign off on any charge.
I agree but I also think people on the other side of it are just as likely to give in. I would never compromise on this case. Its first degree.
Posted on 9/2/26 at 1:25 pm to ShrimperDan
Jury still hung. Court TV says "jurors look frustrated as Tuey-Rodriguez charge read." Judge sent them back to deliberate further.
Posted on 9/2/26 at 1:27 pm to ILurkThereforeIAm
quote:
Jury still hung. Court TV says "jurors look frustrated as Tuey-Rodriguez charge read." Judge sent them back to deliberate further.
It's gonna be over soon. Mistrial 100% incoming
Posted on 9/2/26 at 1:30 pm to KosmoCramer
Yup. You have at least 3 people not budging one way or the other.
Posted on 9/2/26 at 1:31 pm to ILurkThereforeIAm
quote:
Jury still hung. Court TV says "jurors look frustrated as Tuey-Rodriguez charge read." Judge sent them back to deliberate further.
Welp... that's strike 2
Strike 1... judge reads shortened Allen (or in this case Tuey-Rodriguez)
Strike 2... judge reads full Allen (Tuey-Rodriguez) Charge
If they come back again saying they're still deadlocked... Strike 3... hung jury & mistrial declared
Prep for attempt 2 at this trial
This post was edited on 9/2/26 at 1:36 pm
Posted on 9/2/26 at 1:32 pm to rt3
It might be awhile.
But I firmly believe that the Prosecution will learn some lessons from this one and all the things they fricked up
But I firmly believe that the Prosecution will learn some lessons from this one and all the things they fricked up
Posted on 9/2/26 at 1:34 pm to Fun Bunch
quote:
It might be awhile.
But I firmly believe that the Prosecution will learn some lessons from this one and all the things they fricked up
I'd be willing to bet the Commonwealth will have a whole new line-up of experts ready to say exactly what the Commonwealth needs them to say if they go for round 2
& Dr. Mack will be blasted into the sun
This post was edited on 9/2/26 at 1:35 pm
Posted on 9/2/26 at 1:35 pm to rt3
The prosecution is more likely to obtain a conviction if the case actually goes to a second jury trial, though most hung-jury cases never reach a full retrial.
The best available data comes from the National Center for State Courts study Are Hung Juries a Problem? (Hannaford-Agor et al., 2002), which has been repeatedly cited in later legal scholarship.
After a hung jury:
• Only about 32% of cases were refiled for another jury trial.
• Roughly 32% ended in a guilty plea.
• About 22% were dismissed.
Of the cases that did go to a second jury trial:
• ~69–70% ended in conviction
• ~19% ended in acquittal
• ~8% hung again
• ~4% ended in another type of mistrial
Among retrials that produced a verdict, the conviction rate was therefore around 78%.
The best available data comes from the National Center for State Courts study Are Hung Juries a Problem? (Hannaford-Agor et al., 2002), which has been repeatedly cited in later legal scholarship.
After a hung jury:
• Only about 32% of cases were refiled for another jury trial.
• Roughly 32% ended in a guilty plea.
• About 22% were dismissed.
Of the cases that did go to a second jury trial:
• ~69–70% ended in conviction
• ~19% ended in acquittal
• ~8% hung again
• ~4% ended in another type of mistrial
Among retrials that produced a verdict, the conviction rate was therefore around 78%.
Posted on 9/2/26 at 1:40 pm to RLDSC FAN
quote:
The 3 men on the Lindsay Clancy jury getting ready to head back in for day 5
Can't imagine the incessant henpecking they have had to endure over the last few days. God bless them.

Popular
Back to top


1


.jpg)






