- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: The goal post has shifted. No longer a jury of your peers. Now it's a jury of your race
Posted on 6/13/26 at 12:13 pm to NIH
Posted on 6/13/26 at 12:13 pm to NIH
quote:
It’s all so exhausting. How much of our collective national energy, money, and time is spent on these people?
13% of population
90% of problems
0
Posted on 6/13/26 at 12:16 pm to DrrTiger
quote:
Jason Whitlock suggested that blacks who refuse to assimilate into civilized society be given tracts of land (reservations) where they can live within their own laws and system of justice.
I am perfectly okay with this.
Posted on 6/13/26 at 12:19 pm to Undertow
quote:proving the absolute point that absolutely no one, regardless of race, wants to serve on a fricking jury. Those African-American jurors said that , not because they were being honest , because they wanted to go home
They had their chance to have 3 black jurors but they basically disqualified themselves because they admitted they would have trouble convicting a black person.
. And I for one don’t blame them! 
Posted on 6/13/26 at 12:23 pm to stout
quote:
The facts on how the matter escalated are more complicated than that. He and they had no such authority. They are also apparent in the statements that seek to deputize Metcalf and other kids with authority to remove Anthony. They had none and initiated the conflict. That does not mean they should have been killed but it means they have explaining to do.
Well, if Anthony hadn't decided to murder him he could give his side of the story.
Posted on 6/13/26 at 12:23 pm to NIH
quote:Its because that in order to achieve their ultimate goal, rules must be broken. They won’t admit that though. They will try to justify. But they are enemies of this country and they hate it. They think they want a country being run by AOC, but they will never understand how bad that world would be. And they never will until they see it.
There are white male posters on this board who advocate for those very things.
Posted on 6/13/26 at 12:25 pm to stout
Keep pushing for segregation, we’ll gladly accommodate
Posted on 6/13/26 at 12:26 pm to stout
So now they want DEI juries.
Posted on 6/13/26 at 12:27 pm to lsusteve1
Absolutely would take it, they can have their areas, filthy liberals can have their own and America first
Posted on 6/13/26 at 12:27 pm to SallysHuman
quote:
quote:
Jason Whitlock suggested that blacks who refuse to assimilate into civilized society be given tracts of land (reservations) where they can live within their own laws and system of justice.
I am perfectly okay with this.
In another country.
Posted on 6/13/26 at 12:27 pm to stout
An entire tent full of hus peers saw him murder Metcalf and testified to such at hus trial.
Imagine trying to find 12 of Anthony's peers as this tard defines it. Half the jury would have outstanding warrants.
Imagine trying to find 12 of Anthony's peers as this tard defines it. Half the jury would have outstanding warrants.
Posted on 6/13/26 at 12:29 pm to stout
Following her “logic” then this is how you will allow shira law to happen
Posted on 6/13/26 at 12:31 pm to DrrTiger
quote:
They want black jurors because they believe black jurors are
…racist as hell and will refuse to find him guilty regardless of the evidence presented.
Posted on 6/13/26 at 12:34 pm to Split2874
My point is that the goal posts haven’t just shifted. This has been a complaint for a very long time. It’s absurd to think that only a jury of people that have the same skin color can be impartial towards a defendant. During the trial for the police officers the venue was shifted to Simi Valley (which predominantly white) and people flipped the hell out saying that it was rigged for the defense.
Posted on 6/13/26 at 12:34 pm to stout
Right to a black jury would only be possible under a strictly segregated society.
It would take an almost unbelievable shift in the collective conscious for that to be possible.
I would very much like our right to freedom of association to be restored!
That means freedom to exclude people.
It would take an almost unbelievable shift in the collective conscious for that to be possible.
I would very much like our right to freedom of association to be restored!
That means freedom to exclude people.
Posted on 6/13/26 at 12:39 pm to SallysHuman
quote:
skinfolk
Posted on 6/13/26 at 12:54 pm to stout
I only know about this case and trial from here, but my take is that it has been racially charged with opinions split along racial lines for white and black. Given that, not having black jurors likely did put him at a disadvantage.
I think those are two facts that everyone agrees upon. Where the split happens again is whether having black jurors would have resulted in a proper verdict. Whites say no, blacks yes. It's all so fascinating.
I think those are two facts that everyone agrees upon. Where the split happens again is whether having black jurors would have resulted in a proper verdict. Whites say no, blacks yes. It's all so fascinating.
Posted on 6/13/26 at 1:00 pm to Easy
quote:
not having black jurors likely did put him at a disadvantage.
Can you elaborate? Please do be as absolutely specific as possible. Why would this put him at a disadvantage? Why would the racial makeup change the outcome?
Facts are colorblind.
Posted on 6/13/26 at 1:02 pm to beerJeep
How bout a jury of the victims race ?
Posted on 6/13/26 at 1:02 pm to stout
quote:
She is a Harvard Law professor
I have found that any statements made by any professor at any of these institutions are absolute nuts who tried to use their DEI position of importance to dictate life to others
Posted on 6/13/26 at 1:08 pm to beerJeep
Jurors were aware of this case and had already started forming opinions pre-trial. They each come in with their own life experiences and biases. And juries don't deal with "facts", they deal with evidence because not all facts are evidence and vice versa.
Page 2 of 8
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News