- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: The goal post has shifted. No longer a jury of your peers. Now it's a jury of your race
Posted on 6/13/26 at 2:32 pm to Easy
Posted on 6/13/26 at 2:32 pm to Easy
quote:
I've responded to you several times but you're either not understanding or maybe you're wanting me to say something else. I don't know what that is so I feel like it's time to move on.
Be honest with why you think black people not being on jury put him at a disadvantage.
Say what you mean to say and stop being a fricking pussy.
WHY. EXPLAIN IN DETAIL. What SPECIFICALLY would have changed? WHY would it have changed? What difference does racial makeup of an impartial jury have to do with determining the FACTS of the case?
Be.
Honest.
1
Posted on 6/13/26 at 2:37 pm to beerJeep
I just skipped to the end of this thread and noticed Easy is getting his racist nuts stomped. Good for him I guess.
Posted on 6/13/26 at 2:42 pm to BurlesonCountyAg
But on a more serious note, I can see the long game that globalists are playing here. Didn’t the UK recently do away with jury trials for certain crimes? And now we see a hard push here domestically to nullify a jury verdict, using race as the mechanism. The globalists want bench trials because they own the judges. And we know they play the long game; start with something small, stack a few instances together over time, and in 20 years we’re quickly moving in that direction.
This post was edited on 6/13/26 at 2:44 pm
Posted on 6/13/26 at 2:51 pm to stout
"trial, by an impartial jury"
OJ says "hi."
The 6th Amendment
Amendment VI
In all criminal prosecutions, the accused shall enjoy the right to a speedy and public trial, by an impartial jury of the state and district wherein the crime shall have been committed, which district shall have been previously ascertained by law, and to be informed of the nature and cause of the accusation; to be confronted with the witnesses against him; to have compulsory process for obtaining witnesses in his favor, and to have the assistance of counsel for his defense.
OJ says "hi."
The 6th Amendment
Amendment VI
In all criminal prosecutions, the accused shall enjoy the right to a speedy and public trial, by an impartial jury of the state and district wherein the crime shall have been committed, which district shall have been previously ascertained by law, and to be informed of the nature and cause of the accusation; to be confronted with the witnesses against him; to have compulsory process for obtaining witnesses in his favor, and to have the assistance of counsel for his defense.
This post was edited on 6/13/26 at 2:53 pm
Posted on 6/13/26 at 2:59 pm to Easy
quote:
You only wrote one sentence and I agreed with you
I had more than one post. What do you agree with?
Posted on 6/13/26 at 3:01 pm to beerJeep
quote:
Facts are colorblind.
Correct. It’s a dangerous seed that these people are planting in people’s minds that only people that look like you can find you innocent (regardless of facts) and everyone else is predisposed to finding a different looking person as guilty (regardless of facts) leads to greater distrust in society. Or, if the jury is white, they’ll find anyone else as guilty while Asians, Hispanics and blacks will have to band together to fight back. These loons don’t really want a race war, they want to profit off of the racial tensions they are creating and then assume political power. See blm and the progressives.
Posted on 6/13/26 at 3:26 pm to stout
I was on jury duty a couple of years ago. Once we heard all of the actual evidence in a medical malpractice case, it was obvious that the doctor did nothing wrong. If you followed the actual rules of applying the law, he was in the right and the plaintiff was very wrong to sue him. Nevertheless, the black guys on the jury with me (with whom I really liked them and got to know them a bit) were siding with the old woman against the doctor. They didn't understand the nuances and immediately sided against the doctor. I had to talk it out and convince them to rethink the case. In the end, they did....but if it had been an all black jury, I am positive that the doctor would have lost and it would have been the wrong application of the law. Same with Anthony if he had had all blacks. They would have acquitted him and it would have been the wrong call. It's a slippery slope.
Posted on 6/13/26 at 3:38 pm to Figgy
quote:
Correct. It’s a dangerous seed that these people are planting in people’s minds that only people that look like you can find you innocent (regardless of facts) and everyone else is predisposed to finding a different looking person as guilty (regardless of facts) leads to greater distrust in society.
They need to discriminate to fight racism!
Posted on 6/13/26 at 4:15 pm to stout
The US Constitution does not actually say you are entitled to a jury of your peers, it says you’re entitled to an impartial jury
Posted on 6/13/26 at 4:32 pm to stout
I would be happy to give them $25k and a one-way ticket to the country of their choice with the affirmation that their American citizenship is now null and void.
Posted on 6/13/26 at 4:33 pm to donut
quote:
The US Constitution does not actually say you are entitled to a jury of your peers, it says you’re entitled to an impartial jury
Posted on 6/13/26 at 4:48 pm to stout
For people that have screamed about equality my whole life, they don't seem to want it since realizing it comes with accountability.
They would lose their minds if I demanded an all white jury after killing a black man.
Coexistence is getting ready to be tested really hard if they keep this nonsense up.
They would lose their minds if I demanded an all white jury after killing a black man.
Coexistence is getting ready to be tested really hard if they keep this nonsense up.
Posted on 6/13/26 at 4:51 pm to stout
Posted on 6/13/26 at 5:27 pm to SallysHuman
quote:
they want "juries of their peers"- fine... stay in your own "neighborhoods of your peers" to commit violent crime.
Sadly, all desegregation achieved was integration of black culture into previously safe and prosperous areas. Busing has decimated former mostly white schools around my area.
This post was edited on 6/13/26 at 7:12 pm
Posted on 6/13/26 at 6:05 pm to dalefla
quote:
all desegregation achieved was integration of black culture into previously safe and prosperous areas.
Bingo!
Posted on 6/13/26 at 6:51 pm to stout
Good. Since most crimes are committed by minorities, there’s less of a chance to be called for jury duty. Yeah!
Posted on 6/13/26 at 7:20 pm to imjustafatkid
Our justice was designed to be colorblind. Liberals and blacks, not so much. They play identity politics with blacks through their soft bigotry.
Posted on 6/13/26 at 7:38 pm to dalefla
Our justice system was designed by white people for white people.
Posted on 6/13/26 at 7:39 pm to 4cubbies
That’s not true at all
Posted on 6/13/26 at 7:42 pm to lsuguy84
Compelling argument.
Page 4 of 8
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News