- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: The goal post has shifted. No longer a jury of your peers. Now it's a jury of your race
Posted on 6/13/26 at 8:16 pm to stout
Posted on 6/13/26 at 8:16 pm to stout
Frisco is only 10% black and the ones that showed up said they couldn’t be unbiased so tough shite.
His lawyer didn’t oppose the jury selection
His lawyer didn’t oppose the jury selection
0
Posted on 6/13/26 at 8:16 pm to djsdawg
quote:
Your first post in this thread.
You interpreted a comment about the founders of our country and who was able to be legally considered citizens of the country at the time to be a comment about a specific modern-day trial. Yeah totally not a leap. Very linear.
Posted on 6/13/26 at 8:19 pm to SlowFlowPro
quote:
That's only half of what you said, and the less controversial part
Nothing I posted is controversial to anyone with a basic understanding of American history.
Posted on 6/13/26 at 8:26 pm to 4cubbies
quote:
who was able to be legally considered citizens of the country at the time to be a comment about a specific modern-day trial.
This whole thread is about this trial. It specifically about some racist blacks wanting a discriminatory jury, but the system isn’t designed to be discriminatory.
It’s designed to be the opposite, and Thats how it operates today.
You badly needed the constitution to include the word “white”, but it doesn’t, so your comment became retarded.
This post was edited on 6/13/26 at 8:27 pm
Posted on 6/13/26 at 8:36 pm to 4cubbies
quote:
Nothing I posted is controversial to anyone with a basic understanding of American history.
At best, it’s completely irrelevant. American history has nothing to do with this trial, and the new goal posts that racist blacks want. Try to get back to 2026.
Posted on 6/13/26 at 8:41 pm to 4cubbies
quote:
Nothing I posted is controversial to anyone with a basic understanding of American history.
And not one bit of what you said had anything to do with the actual facts of this case. You're race baiting is obvious as is your inability to discuss the actual video and testimony if the witnesses. I'm sure SFP can explain the chances of being found not guilty are when your own witnesses say you're the aggressor.
Posted on 6/13/26 at 9:16 pm to 4cubbies
quote:
Our justice system was designed by white people for white people.
You're too stupid to realize that continued parroting of the same mindless drivel is the problem.
I'm fine if they want to resegregate and define their own system. You can go with them. You ultimately won't like the results as a stupid whitey.
This post was edited on 6/13/26 at 9:26 pm
Posted on 6/13/26 at 9:17 pm to 4cubbies
quote:
basic understanding of American history.
Says the literal retard that thinks Trayvon martin was murdered by a police officer and jail workers murdered Sandra bland.
This post was edited on 6/13/26 at 9:20 pm
Posted on 6/13/26 at 9:20 pm to SOSFAN
quote:
For you to say otherwise is racist towards white people.
Very denigrating towards non whites as she thinks they are too stupid to follow simple laws thus avoiding the judicial system built for whites.
Posted on 6/13/26 at 9:22 pm to 4cubbies
quote:
Women couldn’t vote.
Based on your posts here, is there really any wonder why?
This post was edited on 6/13/26 at 9:23 pm
Posted on 6/13/26 at 10:02 pm to stout
quote:too late. He did an interview the other day. Oh well...still guilty.
The trial judge must be disqualified in any new trial if he actually gave an interview about the case before the appeal was considered. He has negatively affected the appeal rights of the defendant
I'm assuming there will need to be some major procedural issue with the trial for an appeal trail to get approved
Posted on 6/13/26 at 11:38 pm to DustInTheWind
quote:
No matter the evidence. We can’t convict him because he’s black. This is reverse KKK shite. It’s unbelievable.
Same thing on the political side, the NAACP is all for having to carve out districts the width of a residential lot so all the black people live in districts where you are guaranteed a certain racial makeup of on a board. I don’t understand why black candidates don’t try to broaden their viewpoints, to where a black candidate has a broad appeal to all.
In an election, race shouldn’t matter, it should be about your ideas and representing your community not just race.
I wonder in the next local redistricting cycle if Louisiana parishes are going to end the practice of minority districts to ensure a certain racial makeup.
Also, Louisiana legislature should get busy in removing special minority sub districts in some judicial districts and return them to at large races.
I can remember there was a push to split Terrebonne into 5 judicial districts with one minority district. The 5 judges would preside on parish wide cases, but only be elected by their district. Meaning, you had a 4-5 chance that you would face a judge that you didn’t elect. The push ended when the 5th circuit ruled in favor of keeping the current system. Actually, with the current system, Terrebonne has a black judge on the bench already without needing a minority district. 12 years ago a seat opened, and the only candidate was black. So he won without opposition twice. There goes your argument that people in Terrebonne are racist would not support a black candidate.
This post was edited on 6/13/26 at 11:51 pm
Posted on 6/13/26 at 11:58 pm to stout
quote:
Minorities are not interchangeable.
What does this even mean?
Is she suggesting the jury should be comprised of only 17-year old BLACK males?
She is delusional.
Posted on 6/14/26 at 12:01 am to stout
Well no. They only want a jury by race if a black person is on trial.
Posted on 6/14/26 at 1:00 am to stout
The Constitution does not mention a “jury of your peers.”
What it does guarantee is the right to an impartial jury. An impartial jury is made up of people who have no personal stake in the outcome of the case and no meaningful connection to either the defendant or the victim.
The phrase “jury of your peers” is often misunderstood. If taken literally, a person’s peers could mean classmates, teammates, coworkers, fellow church members, or others from the same social circle. That is not what the Constitution requires.
The goal is not to seat people who know or identify with the defendant, but rather to seat jurors who can fairly evaluate the evidence without bias, prejudice, or personal involvement. In other words, they have no skin in the game and can render a verdict based solely on the facts presented in court.
What it does guarantee is the right to an impartial jury. An impartial jury is made up of people who have no personal stake in the outcome of the case and no meaningful connection to either the defendant or the victim.
The phrase “jury of your peers” is often misunderstood. If taken literally, a person’s peers could mean classmates, teammates, coworkers, fellow church members, or others from the same social circle. That is not what the Constitution requires.
The goal is not to seat people who know or identify with the defendant, but rather to seat jurors who can fairly evaluate the evidence without bias, prejudice, or personal involvement. In other words, they have no skin in the game and can render a verdict based solely on the facts presented in court.
Posted on 6/14/26 at 5:01 am to stout
quote:
In a criminal trial, the prosecution has the burden of proof beyond a reasonable doubt. The defendant does not have to prove he is not guilty. Those rules apply to everyone. They apply to Anthony.
Well he confessed to the being guilty part.
I'm no Harvard lawyer but....
Posted on 6/14/26 at 7:15 am to Undertow
quote:
It’s not that white people wont fairly judge a black person, but that the average black person cant be trusted to fairly judge another black person.
I agree 100% with this statement. The O.J. trial showed us that. I feel that the average black person lacks compassion for anyone outside of their race. If they don't look like them, they have no sympathy for the outsider.
I can only speak for myself, but when I see anyone, regardless of their skin color being abused or has something terrible happen to them, I feel compassion toward that person. If the situation was reversed, and the white kid had stabbed the black kid, I can honestly say I would have been outraged and hoped that the white kid would get the stiffest penalty there was...even the death penalty.
But the black folks outside the courthouse and across our country right now who are blaming the white kid for this evilness, show me we may never get to a place where skin color didn't matter. We can only pray.
Posted on 6/14/26 at 7:24 am to Lutcher Lad
quote:
I agree 100% with this statement. The O.J. trial showed us that. I feel that the average black person lacks compassion for anyone outside of their race. If they don't look like them, they have no sympathy for the outsider.
I tried finding it but I seem to remember that a potential juror who got struck said I can't put another black man behind bars, or something along those lines.
Maybe there were some black jurors that could have been impartial, but there were clealry some who couldn't be based on race.
quote:
But the black folks outside the courthouse and across our country right now who are blaming the white kid for this evilness, show me we may never get to a place where skin color didn't matter. We can only pray.
I think the problem at hand is that there isn't someone in the black community that is standing up to this mindset. Right now if a black person tries to challenge the black cultural mindset present in our country, they will be called an Uncle Tom. That person who challenges the mindset needs to be able to stand up to those insults and still gain a following and respect.
The big problem is that the powers at be and the influencers are pushing the white supremecy narrative.
Posted on 6/14/26 at 7:47 am to 4cubbies
quote:
Designed by white people
Would you prefer to live in a justice system designed by black people? Explain.
Posted on 6/14/26 at 10:44 am to 4cubbies
It was designed thinking that the overwhelming majority would be honest and expect everyone to follow the rules. The culture of cheating and grievance breaks the system. Politics of racial division will destroy this country
Page 6 of 8
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News