2
.jpg)
- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Coaching Changes
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: JD Vance tweets his analysis
Posted on 11/4/26 at 10:17 am to Pettifogger
Posted on 11/4/26 at 10:17 am to Pettifogger
quote:
He stood against it, and was absolutely vilified for it.
Did he? Link the video clips of Vance coming out against the war and telling America that he opposed it. All we have are off the record reports that he advised against it. That isn't "standing against it".
This post was edited on 11/4/26 at 10:18 am
Posted on 11/4/26 at 10:17 am to Ingeniero
quote:
work of saving our country.
The uniparty's next big grift folks.
Get ready!
Here they come!
Posted on 11/4/26 at 10:18 am to mggmd
quote:
Backlash was for Thune and do nothing Republican Congress.
The people who even know who John Thune is aren't the ones swinging elections.
Posted on 11/4/26 at 10:18 am to kingbob
quote:
Vance us 100% on the money as usual.
Hindsight is a helluva drug. Maybe Vance et al should have thought about all of this 12 months ago.
Posted on 11/4/26 at 10:18 am to BamaGradinTn
He could also be the 2030 Ohio Governor winner 
Posted on 11/4/26 at 10:19 am to Kattail
quote:
Republicans had power and did nothing with it.
Welcome to almost my entire life.
Posted on 11/4/26 at 10:19 am to Ingeniero
This is a lot better than Trumps stupid tweets
Trump should resign and let JD right the ship. I think that could save 2028
Trump should resign and let JD right the ship. I think that could save 2028
Posted on 11/4/26 at 10:19 am to skullhawk
quote:
He would be a great President.
The hell he would.
I give him props for having the balls to publicly break with the POTUS like this, but his stance against the war was purely motivated by political expediency. It was also reported at the time that this was his reluctance towards the endeavor. That it would "look bad."
Being a leader and being worried about "optics" is no real way to lead anything unless your goal is the furtherance of the status quo.
Good for Vance. But he has no business leading this country.
Posted on 11/4/26 at 10:21 am to T1gerNate
quote:
Man honestly that is a great tweet. He has a lot of integrity to tweet that. Good for him.
I agree.
I'm also pissed about the Save Act, and lack of dem arrests. I still could never vote for the party of baby killing, trannies and lawlessness.
Posted on 11/4/26 at 10:21 am to BoarEd
If you’re against politicians being concerned with optics, I have bad news for you.
Posted on 11/4/26 at 10:22 am to Ingeniero
quote:
Vance seems ready for the pivot
Good
Posted on 11/4/26 at 10:22 am to the808bass
quote:
If you’re against politicians
I am.
Posted on 11/4/26 at 10:22 am to BamaGradinTn
quote:
Did he? Link the video clips of Vance coming out against the war and telling America that he opposed it. All we have are off the record reports that he advised against it. That isn't "standing against it".
So you wanted Vance to come out staunchly against Trump in public in a midterm year?
What would you have had him do? Go look through the GOPe/Neocon/NRO/WSJ messaging of the last six months. He has taken a brutal beating for the internal opposition. Should he not have stood by his own administration (of which he's not the penultimate leader) after doing what he could to advise against the war?
Posted on 11/4/26 at 10:22 am to PorkSammich
quote:
Trump will destroy him
How, exactly? Trump is in a political position to destroy no one anymore.
Posted on 11/4/26 at 10:23 am to BoarEd
quote:
Good for Vance. But he has no business leading this country.
Someone has to be a viable candidate against AOC.
The Gen X retards will elect this count
Posted on 11/4/26 at 10:24 am to BoarEd
quote:
The hell he would.
I give him props for having the balls to publicly break with the POTUS like this, but his stance against the war was purely motivated by political expediency. It was also reported at the time that this was his reluctance towards the endeavor. That it would "look bad."
Being a leader and being worried about "optics" is no real way to lead anything unless your goal is the furtherance of the status quo.
Good for Vance. But he has no business leading this country.
*old guy being shut out of the room.gif*
Posted on 11/4/26 at 10:24 am to Pettifogger
quote:
The Israel lobby
Is this the new term for MAGA?
Posted on 11/4/26 at 10:24 am to ArHog
quote:
Someone has to be a viable candidate against AOC.
His name is Marco Rubio. And I'm not even saying I support Rubio necessarily. Just that he will make for a much better candidate than Vance.
This post was edited on 11/4/26 at 10:25 am
Posted on 11/4/26 at 10:24 am to Ingeniero
5) Stop talking about dudes butts
Posted on 11/4/26 at 10:24 am to MemphisGuy
quote:in a climate where he's going to get impeached and/or distanced from, I just can't see him yielding much more political clout
Trump is in a political position to destroy no one anymore.
Page 3 of 9
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News