- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: House approves war powers resolution.
Posted on 6/3/26 at 6:39 pm to Bunk Moreland
Posted on 6/3/26 at 6:39 pm to Bunk Moreland
Didn’t hear Meeks bitching about gas and groceries under Biden.
0
Posted on 6/3/26 at 6:40 pm to Bunk Moreland
hahahaha
where were these fricktards 20-25 years ago
where were these fricktards 20-25 years ago
Posted on 6/3/26 at 6:42 pm to Bunk Moreland
They’ll be sending pallets with billions in cash for Trump’s racist and religiously bigoted ‘war crime’ attack on the Nation of Iran. This is not satire and hyperbole; they absolutely would if they could. Then the Impeachment.
Moving closer to the throw down.
Moving closer to the throw down.
Posted on 6/3/26 at 6:43 pm to Bunk Moreland
Four Republicans voted with the Democrats:
Thomas Massie
Brian Fitzpatrick
Tom Barrett
Warren Davidson.
Thomas Massie
Brian Fitzpatrick
Tom Barrett
Warren Davidson.
Posted on 6/3/26 at 6:46 pm to Don Quixote
fricking Massie!
L
O
L
Dude is pure white trash.
L
O
L
Dude is pure white trash.
Posted on 6/3/26 at 6:57 pm to Bunk Moreland
house used a concurrent resolution vote to restrict war powers
Supreme Court has ruled in the past that Congress lacks the power to restrict executive actions via the concurrent resolution.
From what I have been reading the senate would need 60 votes to end a filibuster to end debate on the resolution. Also should both house and senate pass the resolution curbing war powers president cannot veto.
But USSC has not ruled if the war powers act if constitutional or not yet and there is speculation if it will be strict down or. It.
Supreme Court has ruled in the past that Congress lacks the power to restrict executive actions via the concurrent resolution.
From what I have been reading the senate would need 60 votes to end a filibuster to end debate on the resolution. Also should both house and senate pass the resolution curbing war powers president cannot veto.
But USSC has not ruled if the war powers act if constitutional or not yet and there is speculation if it will be strict down or. It.
Posted on 6/3/26 at 7:14 pm to Bunk Moreland
Good
Posted on 6/3/26 at 7:18 pm to Bunk Moreland
Good, constitutional authority to declare wars rests with Congress. This is an undeclared war, so Congress must act. I doubt it will matter much though because the institution is so much weaker than intended.
Posted on 6/3/26 at 7:19 pm to wadewilson
You would prefer that Congress handle it.
Posted on 6/3/26 at 7:22 pm to WestSideTiger
quote:
Needs to get passed by the Senate as well. That would really be a nut-buster.
You think Trump will sign into law?
Posted on 6/3/26 at 7:25 pm to Bunk Moreland
If the executive is the commander in chief, how can the legislative branch legislate powers that are reserved for the executive? If they aren’t declaring war, what can they actually do (other than defund the military)?
Posted on 6/3/26 at 7:25 pm to Bunk Moreland
The Democrats are rooting for us to lose the war just to stick it to Trump.
Disgusting Behavior
Disgusting Behavior
Posted on 6/3/26 at 7:26 pm to 4cubbies
quote:
If the executive is the commander in chief, how can the legislative branch legislate powers that are reserved for the executive? If they aren’t declaring war, what can they actually do (other than defund the military)?
Have you ever read the Constitution?
Posted on 6/3/26 at 7:26 pm to Rebel
quote:
Needs to get passed by the Senate as well. That would really be a nut-buster.
You think Trump will sign into law?
You must mean would the people that control Bibi allow him to allow Trump to sign it? Bro, anyone with a heartbeat knows the answer to that question.
This post was edited on 6/3/26 at 7:28 pm
Posted on 6/3/26 at 7:27 pm to wackatimesthree
Very informative response. Thanks.
Posted on 6/3/26 at 7:32 pm to Rebel
quote:
You think Trump will sign into law?
I already said he’d veto it. I’m saying Iran has to be feeling pretty good about now and the Senate would be the icing. So the resolution isn’t exactly meaningless.
Posted on 6/3/26 at 7:33 pm to Wareagle1990
quote:
This is an undeclared war, so Congress must act
this isn't a war. it's barely a skirmish.
Posted on 6/3/26 at 7:36 pm to Bunk Moreland
Little Marco said the war is over so this is meaningless LINK
Posted on 6/3/26 at 7:38 pm to Wareagle1990
quote:
This is an undeclared war, so Congress must act.
Or...hear me out...They could go all in with a AUMF.
That would be nice.
Page 2 of 4
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News