Wareagle1990

quote:

---

Do you even know exactly what he’s insinuating is more important than midterms (aka politics in general)?

---

Please tell us what we’re accomplishing in Iran. Interested to hear this spin.

Not sure what you’re talking about, ma’am.

quote:

---

So let me get this straight, Rubio is a bad choice bc he goes along with DJT's agenda, and Vance would be a good choice for not agreeing with the Iran excursion

---

Rubio not even ten years ago was arguing that the Iraq War wasn’t a mistake, and that NAFTA was good policy. He has no convictions or firmly held beliefs.

Regarding the “excursion”, no one who supports or has supported it will fare well in a general election. Trump’s goal of a multinational agreement with the Middle East is fantasy because Israel won’t rest until there’s wholesale regime change in Iran, and the Arab states don’t trust Israel over Gaza. It’s about as likely as me flying to the moon for breakfast in the morning. So as long as the goal is entirely unrealistic, this war will drag along without anyone offering any concessions.

He is the Republican Hillary Clinton - a perfectly palatable, acceptable mainstream politician who’s been waiting his turn for President for a decade. Very hawkish on foreign policy and changes his economic policy views based on political headwinds. Populism is what wins national elections these days, and Rubio isn’t it. At least Vance had the courage to try to talk Trump out of this fiasco in Iran.

Carroll is a very disturbed woman. In many ways, I feel badly for her and hope she seeks help. It’s despicable that Democrats indulged in this mentally ill woman’s delusions.

Oh I remember her, the serial insider trader