Favorite team:
Location:
Biography:
Interests:
Occupation:
Number of Posts:15521
Registered on:10/10/2019
Online Status:Not Online

Recent Posts

Message
quote:

The DA wouldn’t pursue a case against Cornell students without a slam dunk case


What facts do you think make this a slam dunk case?

Or are you saying you think that facts that haven't yet been made public will be revealed at trial that will make it a slam dunk case?
quote:

And then you called your own rewrite narcissistic.


:lol:

I quoted what you said.

What YOU said. That's what I called toxic and narcissistic. Not what I said.

At first that comment just seemed like a tone deaf, privileged "let them eat cake" sort of comment, but the more I thought about it, the more I realized, that statement wasn't about anybody but you.

You don't care that women are out there in the wild being valued for their looks instead of their mental acuity or competence or demeanor.

Because again, that's not just women. That's everybody. EVERYBODY is judged based on how they appear to people who do not know them. And that's no profound realization...it's self evident to pretty much anybody over the age of maybe 11 or 12.

So this is either a pathetic humble brag or an impotent rage against the machine (depending upon whether you are generally considered to be attractive or not). Either way, it reeks of being personal.

The only other possibility I can imagine is that feminist propaganda has you convinced that only women are judged by looks when it's obviously the entirety of humankind.

And based on some other things that are just as obviously false that you have nevertheless alleged on this thread, I could believe that possibility, except that I would expect a little different angle if that were really the case.



quote:


I've been told by many liberals that these types of surgeries are not being performed on minors... and this is just MAGA conspiracy theory and "transphobe" paranoia.


So have I.
quote:

There’s no indication that a court order was not obtained.


Yep, got it.

Like I said, I just wanted to understand whether the OP was alleging illegal behavior or simply behavior he didn't like, or as SFP has said, behavior that should be illegal.

I'm good. I got my answer.

Thanks for the explanation of terms.
quote:


My comment was supplementing your prior post, not disagreeing with it


O.k.
quote:

Nothing I've seen alleged with specificity is illegal behavior.


Yeah, that's what I said.

I didn't say it was not legal. I said it was not illegal.

quote:

PR/TT only take a routine court order, not a warrant.


I don't know what PT/TT means, I just wanted to know whether what they did was illegal or not.

It's not, so I filed that under Things It's Very Unlikely That Anyone Can Do Anything About and moved on.
quote:

And if the therapist and doctors told the parents that their daughter would kill herself if the surgery wasn't done?


Which they almost certainly did.

quote:

Do you want these surgeries to stop? Then lawsuits are the way.


Probably. Maybe. See below.

quote:

I really don't get people who are against an action but then demand that there can only be one solution, especially when that solution is not very viable.


I disagree with him in this specific instance—if the facts given are accurate, these physicians were liable.

However, I do sympathize with him about lawsuits being a poor solution. Here's why...this lawsuit was successful because not enough due diligence was done. It wasn't successful because the kid regretted it. It was successful because the records didn't show enough due diligence before performing the surgery.

I personally don't trust (in particular) the psychiatric/psychology community to not create a sham "measurement tool" to use to qualify these kids for the surgeries and insulate themselves from lawsuits.

Unless I miss my guess, there's someone out there working on something like that right now. The psychiatric community already does this with "studies" about whether homosexuality is normal/healthy. Everything is designed to produce the result they want, not find out the truth.

So lawsuits may be what we've got right now and I'm glad to see the result of this one (and I think people pouting about the child being awarded money are so fricking stupid I can't believe it), but he's right that we shouldn't rely just on lawsuits.

If a bunch of successful suits hit at once the insurance carriers may just pull the plug on insuring doctors who do this sort of thing, that could happen. And if it does, problem solved.

But it's not guaranteed because of what I posted above. Right now it's a race and this lawsuit was the starter pistol. Can the psychiatric community create the smoke & mirrors it needs to keep the butchering going before the insurance carriers tap out. That's the game right now. At least IMO.

quote:

Remember the actress that had a double mastectomy because her mother and sisters all had breast cancer so she electively did the procedure so as not to also come down with breast cancer? Should her doctors be sued later because she changed her mind?


If she was not competent to consent and the doctors should have known it based on following the established standard of care, but they failed to follow that established standard of care, yes.

That's what you're not getting. This lawsuit was successful because the doctors didn't follow the correct medical protocol.

Not because the kid later changed her mind.
quote:


If more successful lawsuits are forthcoming, hopefully none.


What woke leftist pedophile a-hole is on here downvoting posts like this?
quote:

Unless they botched the surgery, performing an elective procedure that is legal in that state with proper signed documents authorizing the doctors to do the procedures might be wrong ethically in yours and my minds, but they shouldn't be sued for it.


No, the story specifically says it was about negligence, which is a perfectly legitimate reason to sue for malpractice.

If you do not follow the standard of care when deciding whether a medical course of action is justified, you can be sued, and that's the way it should be.

An analogy would be that a doctor performed cataract surgery without paying attention to contraindications for that surgery that reasonable investigation according to the established standard of care would have revealed. The patient had glaucoma and the doctor didn't check for it before doing the surgery and the patient suffered permanent damage to her optic nerve as a result.

The damage was directly related to not doing a cursory investigation of contraindications.

You'll lose that suit every day of the week. And you should.
quote:


What companies are insuring doctors and hospitals that perform child genital mutilation?


If more successful lawsuits are forthcoming, hopefully none.
quote:

Clinton sold military secrets to China, but Trump is the one selling us out.


He did supposedly offer to sell weapons directly to China.

Trump has always been a mixed bag (because he's a populist). And he's done some really good stuff his second term. Locked down the border and eliminated the USAID would be at the top of my list.

But he's also grifted hand over fist. Like, right out in the open. Shockingly blatant grifting. You're right, he's not the only one who has done it, but he might be the one who gives the least fricks about flaunting it.

Two things can be true at once. It's o.k. You can admit that Trump's shite stinks just like everybody else.
quote:

They got a local (crooked) magistrate to sign off on the warrant.


Missed this the first time through. That's my answer.
quote:

And as usual, nothing will happen.


Did they have a warrant? Garland can authorize the surveillance within the FBI, but he can't make it legal by issuing a warrant for it.
quote:

This is where the responsibility lies but you will get down voted as I was.


The parents bear responsibility, but they don't bear professional responsibility.

The doctors do.
quote:

I’m more concerned with giving them $2M.


The point is that if people start winning lawsuits against doctors who participate in this nonsense, it will stop.

That's the story.

Even if it wasn't, I don't see anything wrong with a punitive judgement awarded to this child. She was a child at the time. Her doctors had a professional responsibility to her that they failed to live up to. That's what malpractice is all about.

It's not coming out of your tax dollars, and if the operation was to remove an arm or something without having done adequate medical due diligence first, it wouldn't even be a news story.

re: 100-150 years from now

Posted by wackatimesthree on 10/6/26 at 9:06 am to
quote:

When he dies, and you see the global celebration, you might then realize that your view is not widely shared.


:lol:
quote:

So to feel smart and important they go against anyone in power.


Don't look now, but that's the description of a popuist.
Just what we need.

Another, "What happened to Huckster, he used to be awesome but now he's gone crazy?" thread.

We certainly don't have enough of those up in here.
quote:

Can we not award these freaks $2M?


That's all you got out of this story?