davyjones

I did see that, and while I may not necessarily agree with that as a general matter, I was still curious about Jews in Iran, regardless of any Nazi things and stuff. Feel free to strike from the record my Nazi remark on the back end of the post, and allow the remaining commentary to stand.

I was specifically referring to Jews in Iran. If I misread from the jump, disregard, pretend it never happened, and whatever you do please don’t tell anyone. I’ve got a reputation to uphold.

quote:

---

Why hasn't Iran killed the Jews and Christians in Iran since 1979? They've had plenty of time to do Nazi things inside their own borders if that was their goal.

---

I hadn’t really thought about this concept, strangely enough. As usual, I simply did the googles on it, Jews being of immediate interest.

So there are between eight and ten thousand Jews currently residing in Iran (which if anything I’d guess is inflated, to one degree or another). They live under Sharia law and are forced to declare some sort of oath of allegiance and loyalty to Iran, have to declare themselves a certain “strain” of Jew, can’t hold certain kinds of jobs, can’t do this, must do that, etc etc etc.

So yeah, in fact a bit reminiscent of Jewish “ghettory” in Poland. Definitely at a minimum they are legally restricted in many ways exclusively due to their religion.

Perhaps you didn’t make any googles on this yourself.

You think he was doing what he was doing of his own accord, and not as part of a larger “policy” of Iranian leadership? That seems glaringly implausible.

quote:

---

Trump already met with Kim and North Korea really hasn't been a global nuisance since then. Still a colossal piece of shite regime

---

And because despite Trump not winning the 2020 election, Kim knew that he’d be dealing with Trump again as President, eventually. Pretty astute prediction and anticipation on his part.

Damn bruh, you up in this pitiful thread making fun of the naming of the operation, of all things, not only once but three times…..on just the first page.

quote:

---

so she's not a parrot

good for her, for having an opinion, but this will make the lobbyists in dc very angry. They want our soldiers shedding blood

---

Shut the hell up, you damn butthole. If that were actually the case, with these alleged all-powerful lobbyists as you mentioned, these supposed fork-tailed, blood sucking fiends, if they’re as money hungry and powerful/influential as you seem to believe they are, then why haven’t they already got that machine underway a good while ago? They’ve had numerous opportunities to make it happen.

Man, c’mon man.

Whatever the worst case scenario is in your mind at this moment, that’s what it is. In every moment, in fact, re: Trump. Prove me wrong.

quote:

---

Nobody supports the Democrats man were just done with being lied to by our own side.

John Thune can choke on Graham's 4 inch dick.

---

Well, I certainly wouldn’t argue with your anger and frustration over those types of things. Unacceptable for sure.

That said, let’s just say it this way: It can and would get much, much worse than that if and when Democrats are in charge, worst case scenario being fully in charge of both the Executive and Legislative branches. Which could (and let’s just assume would) ultimately lead Democrats being “in charge” of the Judicial Branch as well.

So, if and while any of us might be thinking about sticking it to your own (Republican) party by refraining from “going to bat for them,” to teach them a lesson, just remember: the ultimate reality is that it would go from bad……to eternal hell.

Lol yeah some amongst us are going to scoff at and say the clearly defined objectives have not been met, or in fact not a single objective has been met, because they don’t want any objectives to be met. So of course they would unanimously disagree about objectives being met. Objectives being met means “Trump was successful,” and they’d rather us go down in flames than Trump be successful. That is becoming exceedingly harder and harder to deny.