
- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: 3 Lindsay Clancy jurors speak out in new NBC10 Boston interview (Updated)
Posted on 9/9/26 at 10:55 am to RLDSC FAN
Posted on 9/9/26 at 10:55 am to RLDSC FAN
quote:
"At the end of the day, there was so much doubt," the woman said. "The prosecution didn't have a figurative smoking gun. There was not a single moment throughout the presentation of that case where you could say 'Yup, 100% I'm certain she did it' or that she didn't do it. There was too much gray area."
Is this woman retarded?
quote:
"And maybe I still believe that in a certain way. I think that this is a woman who was not mentally healthy. She was someone who was in the throes of a significant mental health crisis," the juror said. "I really just felt like she was so deep in it that she couldn't see her way out."
Yes, she might be retarded.
Posted on 9/9/26 at 10:59 am to Hot Carl
quote:
It HAD to be the foreperson projecting her beliefs onto what he actually said and either misinterpreting it
Yep. Completely my assumption here, but I'm betting the lone juror probably said something along the lines of that he believed she was suffering from severe depression or some other type of mental issues/disorder, but that he was still voting guilty.
Then foreperson, having the opinion that any mental issues constitutes reasonable doubt for NGRI, injected that into what she communicated.
This post was edited on 9/9/26 at 11:00 am
Posted on 9/9/26 at 10:59 am to GoCrazyAuburn
Posted on 9/9/26 at 11:00 am to RLDSC FAN
American children are safer with the bear than they are with American women.
Posted on 9/9/26 at 11:19 am to SCLibertarian
Loading Twitter/X Embed...
If tweet fails to load, click here. Actions of support and "self-care".
God I hate this feminist dystopia more than anything. It couldn't be more cringe and evil.
"Self-care" is a term narcissistic feminists came up with somewhere along the line.
"Oh honey you just need a YOU day for you!".
Im so glad these old bitch libs took the time to practice "self-care". No way those 3 murdered children should interrupt their "self-care" sessions.
This post was edited on 9/9/26 at 11:25 am
Posted on 9/9/26 at 11:23 am to tiggerthetooth
So....they've admitted to multiple counts of juror misconduct and the lone juror is the one people wanted removed? 
Posted on 9/9/26 at 12:03 pm to tiggerthetooth
Think about this for a moment: if a man kills 3 kids, he will be immediately targeted once he gets to prison. So either he'll be in protective custody the rest of his life or he's a dead man. What does that tell us? It tells us that the most hardened male criminals still have a more ethical stance about doing harm to children than your average American woman.
Posted on 9/9/26 at 12:17 pm to RLDSC FAN
This BS will be the cause of folks refusing to sit on a jury.
Posted on 9/9/26 at 1:18 pm to Eighteen
quote:
woman use “attractiveness” as justification for all kinds of absurd bullshite and it’s not talked about enough they swoon/vote for “handsome” politicians they swoon/white knight for murderers like Luigi because they think he’s attractive (if Luigi was a white obese redditor named Greg he wouldn’t be nearly as supported) The put the fricking Boston marathon Bomber on the cover of Rolling Stone
Maybe men should take the hint… the power balance in the world is only going to get more female
Posted on 9/9/26 at 1:26 pm to tiggerthetooth
It's becoming clearer by the day that this country cannot continue with these deep divisions. We're either going to have a peaceful separation or an extremely violent one. The differences between normal Americans and the cultural Marxist, feminist, DSA lunatics are too numerous and too insurmountable.
Posted on 9/9/26 at 5:49 pm to RLDSC FAN
I read this all differently.
1. His count was regarding her insanity. He knew she did it, but he wasn’t willing to say it’s because she was crazy. More that he was not willing to let her off with an insanity defense.
2 I read it as she was excited to get to a verdict and out of the jury room. But, I think I misunderstood and she’s just evil.
1. His count was regarding her insanity. He knew she did it, but he wasn’t willing to say it’s because she was crazy. More that he was not willing to let her off with an insanity defense.
2 I read it as she was excited to get to a verdict and out of the jury room. But, I think I misunderstood and she’s just evil.
Posted on 9/10/26 at 9:11 am to RLDSC FAN
Posted on 9/10/26 at 9:34 am to RLDSC FAN
He was so repulsed by witnessing a reenactment of the actual murder weapon being used, but is convinced she is not guilty.
The constant revelation of the number of stupid people existing in this world is deeply depressing.
The constant revelation of the number of stupid people existing in this world is deeply depressing.
Posted on 9/10/26 at 9:44 am to Open Your Eyes
quote:
The constant revelation of the number of stupid people existing in this world is deeply depressing.
It's only going to get worse as the Tik tok generation starts getting called to jury duty more. Less law and more vibes, emotion, and unfounded conspiracy theories.
Posted on 9/10/26 at 9:46 am to Open Your Eyes
This guy is an idiot.
How can 11 jurors get this so wrong? Thank God one man stuck to his convictions and held out, and he's the bad guy here?
How can 11 jurors get this so wrong? Thank God one man stuck to his convictions and held out, and he's the bad guy here?
Posted on 9/10/26 at 10:08 am to RLDSC FAN
These hags should have never been anywhere close to that jury box. Miscarriage of justice.
Mad that the prosecutor was "too mean" to someone that viciously killed her 3 kids??
Mad that the prosecutor was "too mean" to someone that viciously killed her 3 kids??
This post was edited on 9/10/26 at 10:19 am
Posted on 9/10/26 at 10:15 am to jdd48
When I heard their interview I thought, man that dude kept wanting them to read the definition of reasonable doubt because he understood and the rest of them did not. It is not reasonable to think she had a 18 minute psychotic break to do the deed, but was able to hold a conversation with her husband, as if nothing is wrong, while she was in the middle of the process. Apparently the voices in her head stopped for the length of that conversation. I do not think it reasonable to believe that is how psychosis works.
Posted on 9/10/26 at 10:27 am to RLDSC FAN
Releasing all of these statements from jurors is just a calculated attempt by the media to poison the jury pool for the retrial. Jurors will have heard how everyone except for "one crazy guy" was 100% certain that she was not guilty.

Popular
Back to top



0








