Started By
Message

re: 3 Lindsay Clancy jurors speak out in new NBC10 Boston interview (Updated)

Posted on 9/10/26 at 5:15 pm to
Posted by jchamil
Member since Nov 2009
19998 posts
Posted on 9/10/26 at 5:15 pm to
quote:

No Burden on the Defendant: Unlike federal law or most other states which require the defense to prove insanity by clear and convincing evidence or a preponderance of the evidence, a Massachusetts defendant does not have to prove they were legally insane, rather the prosecution must prove beyond all reasonable doubt that they weren't insane..



She was never diagnosed with postpartum psychosis and it only came up after she murdered her children.

That presents reasonable doubt for her NGRI defense. Maybe she was suffering from it, maybe she wasn't, but the fact that she had seen many mental health professionals and no one made that diagnoses until after the fact should make someone pause and wonder if it's bullshite. This guy obviously did just that
Posted by jchamil
Member since Nov 2009
19998 posts
Posted on 9/10/26 at 5:17 pm to
quote:

This is correct. Even the guy who held out basically admits according to the law she was NGRI


Where do you get this? From the one crazy claiming he said he had reasonable doubt?

He could have said he had reasonable doubt about the NGRI defense. He might not have even said that. We haven't heard from him as far as I know
Posted by SCLibertarian
Conway, South Carolina
Member since Aug 2013
42895 posts
Posted on 9/10/26 at 5:17 pm to
This case will be the biggest blackpill of American men in our history. Imagine wanting to marry and have kids with someone so narcissistic and devoid of any agency or accountability that they excuse child murder.
Posted by sgallo3
Lake Charles
Member since Sep 2008
28656 posts
Posted on 9/11/26 at 6:04 pm to
quote:

She was never diagnosed with postpartum psychosis and it only came up after she murdered her children.

That presents reasonable doubt for her NGRI defense. Maybe she was suffering from it, maybe she wasn't, but the fact that she had seen many mental health professionals and no one made that diagnoses until after the fact should make someone pause and wonder if it's bullshite.

Thats the problem with the Massachusetts law. In Massachusetts law the burden is on the state to prove beyond all reasonable doubt she wasnt insane.

In other states the defense has to prove that she was insane.

So her not having a diagnoses that she was insane didnt hurt her in Massachusetts cuz it doesnt prove that she was sane.
Posted by RLDSC FAN
Rancho Cucamonga, CA
Member since Nov 2008
61341 posts
Posted on 9/11/26 at 6:12 pm to
Posted by JetsetNuggs
Member since Jun 2014
15649 posts
Posted on 9/11/26 at 6:16 pm to
It would be awesomely poetic if these dumbasses running their mouths on their fame tour ended up being the ones to get her convicted
This post was edited on 9/11/26 at 6:17 pm
Posted by RLDSC FAN
Rancho Cucamonga, CA
Member since Nov 2008
61341 posts
Posted on 9/11/26 at 6:21 pm to
Posted by sgallo3
Lake Charles
Member since Sep 2008
28656 posts
Posted on 9/11/26 at 8:36 pm to
Hes gonna get dox'd only a matter of time. Our society is broken. Jurys should remain anonymous
Page 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8
Jump to page
first pageprev pagePage 8 of 8Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookXInstagram