- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: How did I miss the whole "moon landing was faked" black pill?
Posted on 12/19/23 at 7:42 am to Gaspergou202
Posted on 12/19/23 at 7:42 am to Gaspergou202
quote:
They lost much international prestige losing the race after an early lead. They would have trumpeted an American fake!
So your contention is Hollywood won the space race for America?
Posted on 12/19/23 at 7:51 am to Rebel
quote:
SirWinston does not understand cameras aperture.
That wasn't even brought up, you liar. That's now two red herrings that you brought up
Posted on 12/19/23 at 7:54 am to SirWinston
Yep, the shadows do run in many different directions. Must have been several "suns" shining on the moon.
But, but, but gooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooberment does not lie to the people it serves!!
But, but, but gooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooberment does not lie to the people it serves!!
This post was edited on 12/19/23 at 7:55 am
Posted on 12/19/23 at 8:19 am to Timeoday
Back in the old days local tv stations would sign on with telling you how they are blasting out so many kilowatts of power to get their signal to travel about fifty miles in Baton Rouge. Maybe 80 miles in New Orleans with a more powerful transmitter but yet …. From the surface of the moon we can transmit 240000 miles with a deep cycle marine battery .
Posted on 12/19/23 at 8:24 am to SirWinston
The moon landing can be real and there exists faked footage/images. They are not mutually exclusive.
Many folks have come out and said some footage didn't survive the radiation belt coming back to Earth and so some manufactured footage was used.
Why did they have manufactured footage already? Well, it was the cold war era and it was a race between Russia and USA to get to the moon first. The USA decided under no circumstances could the moon mission fail so they had a backup plan in the event something went wrong. They created some fake footage in case the mission failed so that they guaranteed a USA win over Russia.
Many folks have come out and said some footage didn't survive the radiation belt coming back to Earth and so some manufactured footage was used.
Why did they have manufactured footage already? Well, it was the cold war era and it was a race between Russia and USA to get to the moon first. The USA decided under no circumstances could the moon mission fail so they had a backup plan in the event something went wrong. They created some fake footage in case the mission failed so that they guaranteed a USA win over Russia.
This post was edited on 12/19/23 at 8:25 am
Posted on 12/19/23 at 8:26 am to SirWinston
There is no moon.
There is only a space lantern that was hung in the sky sometime in approximately the
5th Century(as far as can be determined).
There is only a space lantern that was hung in the sky sometime in approximately the
5th Century(as far as can be determined).
Posted on 12/19/23 at 8:28 am to SirWinston
Watch the Why Files episode on it. Im always down to entertain a conspiracy theory...but im just not sold on that being fake
Posted on 12/19/23 at 8:28 am to Boss13
quote:
The camera couldn't see the stars in the moon landing footage. The astronauts could, but the camera could not because they were too faint in contrast to the surface of the moon which was incredibly bright in relation.
You know… we can’t see stars on camera coverage of city events like New Year’s Eve in Times Square either.
And also… I don’t remember seeing a lot of stars when I was at the last night football game!
Hmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmm..
Posted on 12/19/23 at 8:29 am to Timeoday
quote:
Yep, the shadows do run in many different directions. Must have been several "suns" shining on the moon.
Or they were using some artificial lighting out there.
Of all of the "proof," that one seems the easiest to debunk.
Posted on 12/19/23 at 8:31 am to SirWinston
I refuse to post here that I think the moon landing was a complete fake because I don't want Buzz Aldrin to kick my arse.
Posted on 12/19/23 at 8:32 am to SirWinston
quote:
This seems convincing to me.
This is not surprising.
Posted on 12/19/23 at 8:32 am to notsince98
Or they flew around in low earth orbit and used fake footage to pretend they went further .
Posted on 12/19/23 at 8:33 am to Timeoday
I also like those powerful batteries that can get the temperature in the spacecraft down from 250 degrees to a comfortable 72 . Meanwhile , here on planet earth we don’t have batteries for an RV that can get an air conditioner down from 95 to 72
Posted on 12/19/23 at 8:34 am to SirWinston
wrong road to drive down but you are getting close
Posted on 12/19/23 at 8:37 am to SirWinston
Apollo Landing Sites
Seems like a lot of trouble to go through to make movie sets on the moon so a satellite can take pics of them 50 years later. I think a good scope can see them from earth as well.
Seems like a lot of trouble to go through to make movie sets on the moon so a satellite can take pics of them 50 years later. I think a good scope can see them from earth as well.
Posted on 12/19/23 at 8:42 am to Heyes
quote:
so many kilowatts of power to get their signal to travel about fifty miles in Baton Rouge.
.....where it can be picked up by a pos stick antenna on a k-car after punching through buildings and trees. Transmission power is only a small part of the picture, the others are the sensitivity of the receiving antenna and blockage, which is pretty much zero for talking to the moon. You can buy a satellite phone the size of a snickers; is that a big hoax?
Posted on 12/19/23 at 8:44 am to SirWinston
If the moon landing was fake, the Soviets would have known and gleefully announced it to the world. They had spies everywhere in those days.
Posted on 12/19/23 at 8:47 am to SirWinston
Posted on 12/19/23 at 8:47 am to Timeoday
No spacecraft , Gemini , mercury , space shuttle , Soyuz has gone further into space than one space shuttle mission of 365 miles above the earth surface . That space shuttle mission was already having problems with the van Allen radiation belt which starts at about 1000 miles . Except for Apollo , of course , which went right out through the belt all 240000 miles with the astronauts having all the protection from radiation has you can get from a coke can .
Yet in 2015 sone NASA expert says we need to solve the van Allen radiation problem before we can go to the moon.
Tgat right there is all the evidence you need to prove it’s fake .. we can’t go now. We couldn’t go then. Space is a dangerous place and that radiation belt protects us from the suns harmful effects .
Want to prove we went …. Put some rats in a spacecraft and fly it into the belt. We can see how long it takes them to cook
Yet in 2015 sone NASA expert says we need to solve the van Allen radiation problem before we can go to the moon.
Tgat right there is all the evidence you need to prove it’s fake .. we can’t go now. We couldn’t go then. Space is a dangerous place and that radiation belt protects us from the suns harmful effects .
Want to prove we went …. Put some rats in a spacecraft and fly it into the belt. We can see how long it takes them to cook
Posted on 12/19/23 at 8:52 am to Hooligan's Ghost
quote:
what kind of cheese is it?
It's not cheese at all. If it were, we'd have been going back still today to harvest the precious resource.
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News