- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Champagne
| Favorite team: | Xavier  |
| Location: | Sabine Free State. |
| Biography: | Profession of Arms |
| Interests: | Profession of Arms |
| Occupation: | Profession of Arms |
| Number of Posts: | 55324 |
| Registered on: | 10/2/2007 |
| Online Status: | Not Online |
Recent Posts
Message
re: Which attorneys represent Diocese of Baton Rouge?
Posted by Champagne on 5/19/26 at 9:24 pm to LookAtTheData
Sorry for misunderstanding you.
Victims may very well benefit from discussing their cases with others, but, unless these communications are protected by an atty-client privilege or a patient-physician privilege, they might be Discoverable by the defense atty representing the Accused. I'm pretty sure that ALL social media messages and communications are Discoverable. Victims should ask the Detective or Prosecutor regarding whether and how Victim should discuss the case (or anything tangential to the case) with others. I'll bet the answer is: NO.
I don't know who represents the Diocese in this case. Why would the Diocese be entitled to legal representation by a local attorney when the Vatican is investigating the Diocese. Louisian law doesn't apply to the Vatican's investigation and hearing regarding adverse action against the Diocese handed down by the Vatican. So, I don't understand why you think this question matters. The Diocese isn't accused of a crime. The Priest may need a defense attorney, however, if there's corroborating evidence that he sexuall abused kids. I guess some local defense atty would be hired for that, I hope a Public Defender.
That is very good info you provided WRT how to contact the Detective lead investigator.
As to your final point, I stand by my opinion that if a person needs counseling due to problems arising from being a victim of some kind, a licensed psychiatrist or psychologist is the person to see. Communications with other people are not protected in any way and could be revealed, causing futher harm to the victim. It's not a good idea to seek counseling or psychological advice from anybody but a licensed mental health care provider.
Victims may very well benefit from discussing their cases with others, but, unless these communications are protected by an atty-client privilege or a patient-physician privilege, they might be Discoverable by the defense atty representing the Accused. I'm pretty sure that ALL social media messages and communications are Discoverable. Victims should ask the Detective or Prosecutor regarding whether and how Victim should discuss the case (or anything tangential to the case) with others. I'll bet the answer is: NO.
I don't know who represents the Diocese in this case. Why would the Diocese be entitled to legal representation by a local attorney when the Vatican is investigating the Diocese. Louisian law doesn't apply to the Vatican's investigation and hearing regarding adverse action against the Diocese handed down by the Vatican. So, I don't understand why you think this question matters. The Diocese isn't accused of a crime. The Priest may need a defense attorney, however, if there's corroborating evidence that he sexuall abused kids. I guess some local defense atty would be hired for that, I hope a Public Defender.
That is very good info you provided WRT how to contact the Detective lead investigator.
As to your final point, I stand by my opinion that if a person needs counseling due to problems arising from being a victim of some kind, a licensed psychiatrist or psychologist is the person to see. Communications with other people are not protected in any way and could be revealed, causing futher harm to the victim. It's not a good idea to seek counseling or psychological advice from anybody but a licensed mental health care provider.
0
quote:
getting a foot rub from a woman
Marsellus Wallace threw a guy off of a building just because the dude gave Marsellus's wife a foot rub. There's a whole documentary about it.
LSU mens sports is a bad joke right now.
re: Which attorneys represent Diocese of Baton Rouge?
Posted by Champagne on 5/19/26 at 6:17 pm to LookAtTheData
The OT of Tigerdroppings would be foolish to allow itself to be involved in potential civil tort litigation by allowing itself to serve as a clearinghouse and forum that welcomes accusers and victims of sexual abuse to gather and talk about the crimes perpetrated upon them.
Your idea could also harm the Prosecutor's case against the Accused. Think of what you propose - you propose to have the Witness Victims gather here on the OT to talk about the crime committed on them how it made them feel how it made their family feel - EVERYTING A VICTIM might write here on the OT about the crime would be Discoverable Evidence that Tigerdroppings would be Compelled By Law to produce in a court of law, AND, the owner of Tigerdroppings (Chicken) would be Compelled by Law to appear as a Witness in the case to verify that the print outs of the Victim's statement on the OT is actually the Victim's.
That would be very foolish of TD to take up your idea, but, I'm not the boss around here. I'm just expressing my opinion.
And yes, Grooming with the Specific Intent to condition a targeted victim for sexual abuse is a crime in Louisiana now. That is true. But bear in mind regarding the "specific intent" requirement. I doubt you'll see many cases prosecuted that involved only Grooming and no further violation of the criminal statute. The Grooming IMHO will always be joined with an actual sex abuse charge.
This thread should be Deleted for the sake of Tigerdroppings, but, I'm not the boss around here so, I don't care if it is or not.
So, watch yourself, Groomers! You think it's nice to be nice to kids? NO! Be mean to the little booger-eaters. You don't want anybody to think you're a Groomer. You want them to think "Good gracious that guy really hates kids."
Be safe and KNOW THE LAW.
Your idea could also harm the Prosecutor's case against the Accused. Think of what you propose - you propose to have the Witness Victims gather here on the OT to talk about the crime committed on them how it made them feel how it made their family feel - EVERYTING A VICTIM might write here on the OT about the crime would be Discoverable Evidence that Tigerdroppings would be Compelled By Law to produce in a court of law, AND, the owner of Tigerdroppings (Chicken) would be Compelled by Law to appear as a Witness in the case to verify that the print outs of the Victim's statement on the OT is actually the Victim's.
That would be very foolish of TD to take up your idea, but, I'm not the boss around here. I'm just expressing my opinion.
And yes, Grooming with the Specific Intent to condition a targeted victim for sexual abuse is a crime in Louisiana now. That is true. But bear in mind regarding the "specific intent" requirement. I doubt you'll see many cases prosecuted that involved only Grooming and no further violation of the criminal statute. The Grooming IMHO will always be joined with an actual sex abuse charge.
This thread should be Deleted for the sake of Tigerdroppings, but, I'm not the boss around here so, I don't care if it is or not.
So, watch yourself, Groomers! You think it's nice to be nice to kids? NO! Be mean to the little booger-eaters. You don't want anybody to think you're a Groomer. You want them to think "Good gracious that guy really hates kids."
Be safe and KNOW THE LAW.
Why are the classmates lying and why are they so opposed to making America Safe and Welcoming for TransKids?
re: Which attorneys represent Diocese of Baton Rouge?
Posted by Champagne on 5/19/26 at 3:37 pm to LookAtTheData
quote:
Detective Dorin Copeland
East Baton Rouge Parish Sheriff’s Office
225-389-5061
Dcopeland@ebrso.org
Zumo is a witness. You needn't involve yourself.
Zumo should talk to Detective Copeland. Anybody who has any information regarding improper contact with a minor should immediately call 911 and report the crime. Tell 911 that Det. Copeland apparently is the lead investigator.
Anybody to whom any evidence of child abuse or admission of child abuse is revealed - IMMEDIATELY call 911 to report the crime. AFTER that, you can call or contact anybody you care to, but FIRST call the Police and tell them that a child is in danger and needs emergency police intervention now.
It's as simple as that. There's no need for any private citizen to try to investigate the crime and there's no need for a private citizen to report the crime to another private citizen in the hope that the private citizen receiving your info will call the police, because you need to Call 911 yourself and report the crime immediately.
re: Rate these weiners
Posted by Champagne on 5/19/26 at 3:32 pm to apparition of pio
quote:
A lot of people don’t know that Frankfurters was the doctor, not the monster.
"The Frankfurter Monster" is the terminology that I prefer to use, particularly when the topic comes up during convos with hot chicks.
re: Rate these weiners
Posted by Champagne on 5/19/26 at 2:06 pm to apparition of pio
I prefer to call them Frankfurters.
re: Which attorneys represent Diocese of Baton Rouge?
Posted by Champagne on 5/19/26 at 1:44 pm to LookAtTheData
This thread should be deleted. The OP himself refuses to answer a simple question regarding his motive for wanting to personally contact an individual who may not wish to be contacted.
Thus, the purpose of the thread itself appears to be improper.
Thus, the purpose of the thread itself appears to be improper.
quote:
It seems to me that
Thank you for your personal opinion on what the Bible says there on that issue.
I have already expressed my own personal opinion on what the Bible means on the issue of statues, idols and worship of pagan gods. I'm pretty sure that I'm on solid ground WRT to this particular Commandment, and, any Christian that is not worshipping statues or sculptures instead of worshipping God, is probably also on solid ground WRT this Commandment.
As for your own expanded interpretation, I can see how it would be helpful, so long as you don't expand your interpretation to the extent that you oppose somebody who wants to build a statue of Jesus Christ because you say it violates a Commandment. Some people will tell us that this is exactly how they interpret this Commandment and my response to them is this: this is America and you are permitted to interpret these Bible passages in any personal manner that you see fit, just don't expect the rest of us to kow-tow to your personal interpretation.
God would not want us to fight over this issue.
re: What America needs most is true revival and that only comes from the true gospel
Posted by Champagne on 5/19/26 at 10:08 am to Mike da Tigah
Pastor John Hagee agrees with you completely.
Americans need Religion more than they need Politics.
Is this the Religion Board now?
PS Could you summarize the main point of this 45 minute video of a Pastor's Sermon that you posted here on Political Talk? Thanks.
LINK
Americans need Religion more than they need Politics.
Is this the Religion Board now?
PS Could you summarize the main point of this 45 minute video of a Pastor's Sermon that you posted here on Political Talk? Thanks.
LINK
They must be TD PT posters because they are commenting on a document before they have even bothered to read it.
quote:
he meaning of “thou shall not”
The Commandment is that we shall not make statue idols of pagan, false gods from places like Babylon and Assyria, nor shall we make a statue of a Golden Calf in order to worship that idol instead of worshipping Yahweh, Lord God Almighty.
Thou shalt not carve then worship statues of pagan gods from Greece, Roman Empire, Assyria or Babylon, instead of worshipping Yahweh Lord God Almighty.
That's what it means.
I think we're all good with this. I don't think anybody in Louisiana has a Golden Calf Statue on his property that he worships as his almighty god.
re: Which attorneys represent Diocese of Baton Rouge?
Posted by Champagne on 5/19/26 at 9:00 am to LookAtTheData
quote:
How should concerned Catholics contact Luke Zumo?
May I ask why you feel the need to "contact Luke Zumo"? What is the purpose of your request?
re: Armenia is building the largest statue of Jesus Christ in the world
Posted by Champagne on 5/19/26 at 8:36 am to MRTigerFan
quote:
Why it gotta be white?
If Helen of Troy looks like a Nigerian, then the Jesus statue should have an Afro hair style.
So, the fact that, at the time when this Commandment was written, the "idols" that were forbidden happened to be the idols of pagan countries like Babylon and Assyria?
You don't think it's possible that the Commandment was written to forbid the creation of pagan idols for the purpose of worshipping them, but not a statue of Jesus Christ?
You are going to insist that there is only one possible interpretation of that Bible passage?
You don't think it's possible that the Commandment was written to forbid the creation of pagan idols for the purpose of worshipping them, but not a statue of Jesus Christ?
You are going to insist that there is only one possible interpretation of that Bible passage?
re: PeePee PooPoo man arrested again on horrifying charges
Posted by Champagne on 5/18/26 at 10:04 am to tiggerthetooth
This man should be set free because he serves as an opportunity for Toronto to manifest its Maximum Potential for Tolerance and Diversity of Culture.
Toronto must seek to understand and tolerate him, not imprison another black man in the White Supremacist North American Slave Trade Prison System.
FREE PeePee PooPoo !!
And, what is this degrading and dehumanizing nickname that White Society gave him?!? PeePee PooPoo?? That's Racist AF.
Give him a more dignified nickname like maybe "Nigel" or "Ian".
Toronto must seek to understand and tolerate him, not imprison another black man in the White Supremacist North American Slave Trade Prison System.
FREE PeePee PooPoo !!
And, what is this degrading and dehumanizing nickname that White Society gave him?!? PeePee PooPoo?? That's Racist AF.
Give him a more dignified nickname like maybe "Nigel" or "Ian".
re: Mets take 2 of 3 against the Yanks
Posted by Champagne on 5/18/26 at 9:19 am to littleavery1948
quote:
But the Mets can hang the "May 2026 Subway Series Champions" banner at Citi Field!
That will be the only banner the Mets will hang for this season. The Mets are going nowhere and really have no future.
:lol:
There's another Subway Series in Yankee Stadium, right?
Yanks have another chance to beat the Mets.
Yanks have another chance to beat the Mets.
IF the team wins out, they win the CWS again this season, pal.
Season's not over yet, jabroni.
Season's not over yet, jabroni.
We know that Rules and Morality are never obstacles to the US Democratic Party.
Popular
16
