Started By
Message

re: Were the Dixie Chicks victims of faux outrage when they denounced Pres. Bush in 2003?

Posted on 2/27/19 at 7:58 am to
Posted by DBAG DREW
Member since Feb 2018
141 posts
Posted on 2/27/19 at 7:58 am to
She underestimated how big of idiots her fan base was.
Posted by mikelbr
Baton Rouge
Member since Apr 2008
49099 posts
Posted on 2/27/19 at 8:00 am to
quote:

I think the whole Bush family is rotten to the core and Dubya was a terrible President, but going overseas and begging Europeans to like you by trashing your own country is some fricked up, repugnant shite. Talk about pathetic.


I still listen to the Dixie Chicks and Kanye
I Hope Eric Reid does well in the NFL
I Watch Sean Penn, Tim Robbins, Susan Sarandon movies
And still Jerk off to Jane Fonda's pics from the 80s.

I don't care what they do when not entertaining me.

Posted by uway
Member since Sep 2004
33109 posts
Posted on 2/27/19 at 8:03 am to
quote:

We do not want this war, this violence, and we're ashamed that the President of the United States is from Texas


I think the bolded part is dumb, especially for the time the statement was made.

I agree now with the rest of it. We shouldn’t have gone to Iraq, and I will never again so willingly trust anyone who wants to plunge us into war.
Posted by MorbidTheClown
Baton Rouge
Member since Jan 2015
76768 posts
Posted on 2/27/19 at 8:03 am to
quote:

And still Jerk off to Jane Fonda's pics from the 80s.


Hanoi Jane's workout videos....

Posted by jimmy the leg
Member since Aug 2007
45294 posts
Posted on 2/27/19 at 8:05 am to
quote:

The downvotes you’re receiving are faux outrage.


Meh. People have long memories. What they did, especially with the circumstances at the time, was deemed by most to be grossly offensive (including by me I might add). That being said, I think their comments were put on blast by the administration / media to solidify support for the war.
It pretty much killed off all opposition. Their stupidity was a useful tool. The faux outrage machine has been used from both sides of the aisle for awhile. Most "victims" are stipid. This is just one more example.
Peace peeps.
Posted by Klark Kent
Houston via BR
Member since Jan 2008
75878 posts
Posted on 2/27/19 at 8:06 am to
ehh, just the first noticeable public shite talking against the current president in the 21st century. which is at an all time high now.

their music sucked anyhow and it was only a matter of time before they faded into non-existence. my bigger problem with was they handled the negative feedback. they played the victim instead of standing behind their point and providing context or validation to it.
Posted by hob
Member since Dec 2017
2402 posts
Posted on 2/27/19 at 8:13 am to
quote:

I think it was actually just Maines that went rouge


I think dressing in red face would be non-PC now.
Posted by Bourre
Da Parish
Member since Nov 2012
24227 posts
Posted on 2/27/19 at 8:13 am to
Woof. Those birches are ugly on both the inside and the outside of their bodies
Posted by Festus
With Skillet
Member since Nov 2009
86142 posts
Posted on 2/27/19 at 8:17 am to
If by faux, you mean fake? Ask their managers and tax accountants if the rage was fake. They basically went from being a super group of the time to a nobody. Their bank accounts took a huge hit. And on top of all that, people that loved them, suddenly despised them. They basically ceased to become a relevant musical group.

Faux outrage doesn't cause that.
Posted by BowlJackson
Birmingham, AL
Member since Sep 2013
52881 posts
Posted on 2/27/19 at 8:20 am to
"But muh weapons of mass destruction"
Posted by dcrews
Houston, TX
Member since Feb 2011
32130 posts
Posted on 2/27/19 at 8:21 am to
quote:

I remember they were basically blacklisted by everybody after that.


Were they though?

I would imagine country music fans are mostly conservative/conservative leaning.

If that's your fan base and you denounce the president of the US who is a conservative and from Texas, I would imagine you are going to get a good bit of backlash.

Posted by TBoy
Kalamazoo
Member since Dec 2007
29107 posts
Posted on 2/27/19 at 8:24 am to
Yes. Their banter wasn't as strong as anything you hear these days. But certainly at that time in country music, women were expected to shut up and do what they were told. When they refused to bend over, the right wing attacked.
Posted by MorbidTheClown
Baton Rouge
Member since Jan 2015
76768 posts
Posted on 2/27/19 at 8:25 am to
quote:

at that time in country music, women were expected to shut up and do what they were told.


it's not like this happened in the 50s
Posted by Festus
With Skillet
Member since Nov 2009
86142 posts
Posted on 2/27/19 at 8:25 am to
quote:

When did Colin insult his base?

You don't think Colin insulted his base? A great deal of everyday people that watched football despised what he was doing. So much so, that he couldn't stay on with any team. Yeah, he sucked, but nobody wanted his baggage image.

quote:

In fact, he just got paid handsomely by Nike who gained business after the deal.

Just because he got paid handsomely by another company, doesn't mean he didn't insult a vast majority of his base. There are certain Nike clientele that have no issues with him. Others will no longer buy their product.

Nike made a PR move to pander to a certain portion of their customer base. But that doesn't mean Colin and his kneeling didn't insult a great amount, most likely a majority, of his base. He thumbed his nose at his country publicly. That will always insult a great deal of any base. And will make a small portion that hate America, and Law enforcement, celebrate.
Posted by 777Tiger
Member since Mar 2011
93541 posts
Posted on 2/27/19 at 8:28 am to
quote:

it's not like this happened in the 50s

yep, disagree with that observation
Posted by TH03
Mogadishu
Member since Dec 2008
172004 posts
Posted on 2/27/19 at 8:30 am to
The type of people buying the majority of Nike products are not conservatives who got pissed off by him. That's the main difference between him and the Dixie chicks. They pissed off all their fans, he pissed off just a portion.

And plenty of teams tried to sign him, he and his psycho girl just ruined it. Probably just to keep the shite in the news.
Posted by SelaTiger
Member since Aug 2016
21939 posts
Posted on 2/27/19 at 8:33 am to
From a business standpoint they were morons. Should have kept their mouths shut. But they were right in what they said.
Posted by Desert King
Member since Oct 2018
1936 posts
Posted on 2/27/19 at 8:33 am to
This is why I can’t ever take the left seriously whenever they act like their vitriol towards Trump is some one-off occurrence because of how particularly “horrible” and “evil” HE is. Um, No. They were saying the same ignorant stuff about George W. I remember.
Posted by kywildcatfanone
Wildcat Country!
Member since Oct 2012
141046 posts
Posted on 2/27/19 at 8:34 am to
Liberals are always victims.
Posted by Festus
With Skillet
Member since Nov 2009
86142 posts
Posted on 2/27/19 at 8:35 am to
quote:

That's the main difference between him and the Dixie chicks. They pissed off all their fans, he pissed off just a portion.

Good point, and for the most part I agree. But I do think that he pissed off a pretty big portion of his fan base with the football issue. Not to mention, 100% of his employer base.

There's still a ton of everyday good ole boys that watch and support NFL football. That portion was pissed off. And it was a lot of pissed off people.
first pageprev pagePage 3 of 8Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookXInstagram