Favorite team:US Space Force 
Location:Kalamazoo
Biography:“You don’t create a wild fantasy about your leader being a covert genius unless you understand that to most people, he looks like something quite different.”
Interests:
Occupation:
Number of Posts:28055
Registered on:12/11/2007
Online Status:
 Online

Recent Posts

Message
Let’s take a brief inventory of the Trump dictator shakedown demands:

$10 Billion demand to be transferred to Trump directly from the IRS;
$5 Billion demand to be transferred directly to Trump from JP Morgan;
$230 Million demand to be transferred directly to Trump by DOJ for investigation in Florida;
$15 Billion demand to be transferred directly to Trump by the New York Times;
$5 Billion demand to be transferred directly to Trump by the BBC.

And that is before the voluntary payouts from middle eastern governments and organizations and crypto scams.

And this is cheered?
Trump is demanding to be bribed again. How many mob shakedowns has Trump done?
Steal or no steal, Trump is limited to two terms. Besides, he will be like 100 years old by then.

re: Update: Situation in Iran thread

Posted by TBoy on 2/23/26 at 12:28 pm to
quote:

The official assessed that any U.S. strike would likely include off ramps for the Ayatollah regime, allowing Tehran a path to stand down rather than face total collapse.

Where would they all go? Brazil? Liberia? Montana?
quote:

Read the rest of the thread tsoy where I explain how I think this fits into a modern interpretation before you comment please

Dude, just stop with the “Monroe doctrine.” It is not whatever you imagine it to be. You can’t change it now that Monroe is no longer president. Call it something new, fine. But we can’t just redefine historical things.
quote:

This cannot be allowed so close to our country if we want to take the Monroe doctrine seriously in a modern form

What on Earth do you think the Monroe doctrine actually is?

re: Obamacare failure

Posted by TBoy on 2/23/26 at 6:13 am to
quote:

My health insurance before Obamacare was $180 a month and I had better coverage than what I’m paying $853 a month for now.

You are comparing your health insurance premium almost 20 years ago to today? Wow.

The rate of increase before 2010 was already high.

re: Obamacare failure

Posted by TBoy on 2/23/26 at 6:04 am to
Our present health care system sucks? Ok. Fix it!

re: Tonight I met Bonstalker

Posted by TBoy on 2/22/26 at 11:58 am to
quote:

Tonight I met Bonstalker

Farking legend. That dude should never have to pay for his own drinks.

re: $9,000 brake job at dealership

Posted by TBoy on 2/22/26 at 10:28 am to
quote:

me newer vehicles with automatic electronic parking brakes have to have a scanner that can reset that system after a brake service. Some have to have the scanner to release those brakes through the ECM before you can do anything with them.
Don’t know about any vehicle except ones we own, but there is a manual work-around for Honda that is not difficult. Adds about 10 minutes to the job, at most.
It was a great game. Both sides had just enough luck and the skill pressure was incredible.

re: $9,000 brake job at dealership

Posted by TBoy on 2/22/26 at 10:12 am to
I just ordered a set of rear brake pads and rotors from Power Stop and the total, with shipping, is $131.00.

Can I charge my wife $8,800 for the labor?

re: Update: Situation in Iran thread

Posted by TBoy on 2/21/26 at 4:12 pm to
quote:

Iranian Revolutionary Guard Corps forces are advancing equipment toward the Iraq border.

Would that make them easier to isolate and hit in an airstrike, avoiding the risk of civilian casualties?

re: Tariffs

Posted by TBoy on 2/20/26 at 9:10 pm to
Of course there are rational applications of tariffs. Tariffs can be used to protect domestic specific industries. For example, we could impose a tariff on imported shrimp to drive its price up to protect the viability of the Gulf shrimpers. Other tariffs could protect domestic wages for labor intensive products.

Today’s announcement of 10% on every import from everywhere is irrational. It’s just a tax with no policy purpose.

And liberals don’t “hate tariffs.” Actually, free market capitalists hate tariffs. Liberals do however understand that Trump’s tariff policies are irrational and will do more harm than good.

re: Trump Announces New 10% Global Tariff

Posted by TBoy on 2/20/26 at 4:24 pm to
quote:

How does the US implementing a 10% global tariff result is "us" being "taxed more".

Because foreigners are not subject to US taxation. The US government cannot levy taxes on foreign citizens residing in foreign nations. The US government's taxing jurisdiction only extends to people and companies here in America. Tariffs are imposed on the US importers, not on the foreign exporters.

So "we" are being "taxed more."

How could you possibly not understand this by now?

re: Trump Announces New 10% Global Tariff

Posted by TBoy on 2/20/26 at 3:01 pm to
Tax us more because “why not?”

You are the very definition of a toady moron.

re: Trump Announces New 10% Global Tariff

Posted by TBoy on 2/20/26 at 2:59 pm to
quote:

Trump Announces New 10% Global Tariff

Why?
quote:

Roberts ia terrible. Barrett is weak. Gorsuch is a rock star, but is wrong on this one

I had a lot of respect for Alito in his prime but he has become lazy and is way too infatuated with Trump.
quote:

It was a great dissent from Thomas. But the statute never once mentions or even hints at the word "tariff"

It is always interesting when “textualists” suddenly want to ignore the text because they really just want to support their tribe. The “text” is only important when it limits the other tribe.
quote:

They ruled against 250 years of Tariffs

We all know Trump is super old and falls asleep at random times, but he isn't 250 years old. Your statement isn't fair to the geezer.