- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: St. George's Petition Has Been Verified!
Posted on 2/25/19 at 2:23 pm to LSUFanHouston
Posted on 2/25/19 at 2:23 pm to LSUFanHouston
This should be on the ballot when we vote for governor. Largest possible turnout to get a true representation of the electorate
0
Posted on 2/25/19 at 2:24 pm to teke184
Email Chauna, she is very eager to come back with A witty comment
Posted on 2/25/19 at 2:25 pm to LSUFanHouston
quote:
How long does JBE have for this certification?
Odds that he sits on it long enough so that it doesn't go on the ballot until AFTER this fall's elections?
I assume he could just pressure legislators to vote against it as a bargaining chip for some pet project in their district
Posted on 2/25/19 at 2:27 pm to dallastigers
quote:
The attempt When BR quickly incorporated the businesses south of I10 starting around Bluebonnet did they also incorporate the neighborhoods south towards Burbank and Ms River? If so did they draw it in a way to keep status quo of BR’s racial politic?
If you are talking about Preserve at Harveston, Springlake, and Fairhill subdivisions on Bluebonnet, I believe those are in the proposed St George. They are on the border so subdivisions north of that (Gardere) are out of proposed SG.
Posted on 2/25/19 at 2:29 pm to upgrayedd
He can try but this will end up biting them in the arse.
They can either let this go to a vote or they can block it through frickery and guarantee both a pissed off electorate and a bunch of ads coming in about how JBE and the legislature wants to force kids to stay in failing schools.
They can either let this go to a vote or they can block it through frickery and guarantee both a pissed off electorate and a bunch of ads coming in about how JBE and the legislature wants to force kids to stay in failing schools.
Posted on 2/25/19 at 2:30 pm to kadillak
quote:
Preserve at Harveston, Springlake, and Fairhill subdivisions on Bluebonnet,
Definitely St. George.
Posted on 2/25/19 at 2:30 pm to TigersSEC2010
God bless the city of St.George!
Posted on 2/25/19 at 2:30 pm to fallguy_1978
quote:
St. George's Petition Has Been Verified!
quote:
so who gets to vote on this?
People that live in the proposed area
the only hope for it not passing will be if the BR news media keeps a lot of stories and several political figures out of the news and public eye...Posted on 2/25/19 at 2:30 pm to teke184
quote:
He can try but this will end up biting them in the arse.
They can either let this go to a vote or they can block it through frickery and guarantee both a pissed off electorate and a bunch of ads coming in about how JBE and the legislature wants to force kids to stay in failing schools.
I thought the legislature is ultimately the final say in creating a new school district
Posted on 2/25/19 at 2:31 pm to upgrayedd
The legislature will decide, but it would be unprecedented for them not to grant a request for a school system to a city
Posted on 2/25/19 at 2:32 pm to upgrayedd
This is for the city. A school district would need a constitutional amendment passed by the legislature, A vote by SG, a vote by EBRP, and a vote by the entire state.
Posted on 2/25/19 at 2:33 pm to upgrayedd
Having that ability doesn’t make it any less a problem for them to deny it.
The entire reason St George is forming is because the legislature told the ISD they needed a city to get approval.
Turning down the city for approval will bite a number of legislators and JBE in the arse if they try it.
The entire reason St George is forming is because the legislature told the ISD they needed a city to get approval.
Turning down the city for approval will bite a number of legislators and JBE in the arse if they try it.
Posted on 2/25/19 at 2:34 pm to TigersSEC2010
frick Yeah!
Posted on 2/25/19 at 2:39 pm to member12
Butthurt Together BR people downvoting this thread like crazy
Posted on 2/25/19 at 2:39 pm to thatguy777
quote:
This is for the city.
Yes, I don't think the legislature has any say on the city incorporation petition.
quote:
A school district would need a constitutional amendment passed by the legislature, A vote by SG, a vote by EBRP, and a vote by the entire state.
i thought the whole deal with incorporating a city, is so that you don't have to involve the rest of the state in a vote. Isn't that how it worked with Zachary and Central?
Posted on 2/25/19 at 2:39 pm to TigersSEC2010
Finally some good news for the BR baws
Posted on 2/25/19 at 2:40 pm to threeputtforbogie
12,996 signatures needed to equal 25%
17,102 signatures submitted
14,385 signatures certifed (1369 over minimum)
2517 signatures rejected
Posted on 2/25/19 at 2:40 pm to LSUFanHouston
All CAs passed by the legislature require a statewide vote. That’s just the process
Posted on 2/25/19 at 2:43 pm to tommy2tone1999
quote:
2517 signatures rejected
People moved out of St. George during the span of collecting signatures? Or maybe people renting signing up?
Seems like a lot of rejections.
Posted on 2/25/19 at 2:46 pm to ctiger69
quote:
Maybe I should move to St George.
I’ll gladly sell you my home for 50% more than it’s ZEstimate.
A lot of Magas are going to shell out way more money than they need to for homes if this goes through. And Five years from now they will be wondering WTF happened to the White-topia they thought they were getting.
Page 4 of 12
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News