- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Nebraska Teacher, 26, Facing 20 Years in Prison for Dating High School Graduate, 19
Posted on 2/4/26 at 11:33 pm to beauchristopher
Posted on 2/4/26 at 11:33 pm to beauchristopher
The school was only about 30 minutes from Lincoln so I'm not buying the rural dating pool excuse, especially if the grooming started when she was 17.
Edit: and the dude lived in Lincoln in a freaking college town. This shite happened a few years ago at a local school in Lee County, AL, and the teacher had all the legal college aged girls he could've wanted right there in Auburn.
Edit: and the dude lived in Lincoln in a freaking college town. This shite happened a few years ago at a local school in Lee County, AL, and the teacher had all the legal college aged girls he could've wanted right there in Auburn.
This post was edited on 2/4/26 at 11:38 pm
0
Posted on 2/4/26 at 11:41 pm to Saint Alfonzo
quote:
What in the Quagmire is this? The girl was 18 and out of school.
And the teacher is not a high school teacher.
This seems wrong.
Posted on 2/4/26 at 11:52 pm to stout
There was a case at South Beauregard where the student was of age and the soccer coach, who was much older, preyed upon her. In that case, he was charged and convicted since she was still a student.
17 is legal age in Louisiana. And the teacher relationship makes it illegal but merely a misdemeanor.
17 is legal age in Louisiana. And the teacher relationship makes it illegal but merely a misdemeanor.
Posted on 2/5/26 at 5:19 am to Penrod
By everything accept this one law, ehich Nebraska is alone in having.
I’m not saying the guy should keep his job and I’m not arguing whether or not he broke the law. He clearly did. But I don’t agree with the law.
Like I said if the district wants to fire him and state take away his license I’m 100% on board with that. I don’t think this should be a situation that constitutes jail time though and it seems like most states agree
I’m not saying the guy should keep his job and I’m not arguing whether or not he broke the law. He clearly did. But I don’t agree with the law.
Like I said if the district wants to fire him and state take away his license I’m 100% on board with that. I don’t think this should be a situation that constitutes jail time though and it seems like most states agree
This post was edited on 2/5/26 at 5:21 am
Posted on 2/5/26 at 6:05 am to Cracker
quote:
she was 18 and a graduate already, when the trial begins all she has to do is not show up
But there is still physical evidence in text messages that can still be used against him. Not sure if having her just refuse to testify is enough to create doubt in a jury of him breaking the spirit of the law.
I can recall a female teacher although older going through a similar situation in Lafourche parish about 15 years ago, for going after a 17 or 18 year old in the sack, back then in Louisiana it was a misdemeanor and may still be that.
She lost her teaching certificate for a time and was later able to get the misdemeanor expunged as a first time offender and reapply to get her teaching certification back. Not sure if she is back in a classroom at a different school district. Ironically her hubby was a teacher too at the same school when the infidelity occurred and still teaches at the same school. I believe they are still married and have children now.
Posted on 2/5/26 at 6:19 am to djmed
Glad to see police focusing their efforts on real criminals
Posted on 2/5/26 at 6:39 am to Cracker
quote:
she was 18 and a graduate already, when the trial begins all she has to do is not show up
What? That's not how it works.
This post was edited on 2/5/26 at 6:41 am
Posted on 2/5/26 at 6:43 am to djmed
I don't see the issue
Posted on 2/5/26 at 6:45 am to Harry Caray
quote:
Using some critical thinking here
quote:Something you are completely incapable of doing
Harry Caray
Posted on 2/5/26 at 6:48 am to Harry Caray
You are dumb.
Posted on 2/5/26 at 7:46 am to Bottom9
Grandparents were 24 and 18 when they got married. 60 years.
Posted on 2/5/26 at 8:06 am to Pedro
quote:
I don’t think this should be a situation that constitutes jail time though and it seems like most states agree
I agree with that, and it probably won’t unless they have automatic sentencing.
Posted on 2/5/26 at 8:44 am to biglego
quote:
17 is legal age in Louisiana. And the teacher relationship makes it illegal but merely a misdemeanor.
RS 14:81.4
Prohibited sexual conduct between educator and student
A. Prohibited sexual conduct between an educator and a student is committed when any of the following occur:
(1) An educator has sexual intercourse with a person who is seventeen years of age or older, but less than twenty-one years of age, where there is an age difference of greater than four years between the two persons, when the victim is not the spouse of the offender and is a student at the school where the educator is assigned, employed, or working at the time of the offense.
So...let's say there is a 20 year old senior(started school late, held back one year) attending a K-12 private school. He has sex with a 25 year old Pre-K teacher there. That means she's going to jail, right?
Posted on 2/5/26 at 8:45 am to dallastigers
quote:
ut a few things about the below seem incorrect.
Such as what? It provides a much clearer timeline than the People article.
He was busy grooming her when she was 17.
If that was your daughter, would you have a problem with her teacher sending her sexually explicit texts?
Posted on 2/5/26 at 8:54 am to prplhze2000
quote:
Grandparents were 24 and 18 when they got married. 60 years.
My grandpa was 19 and my grandma was 15 when they got married and had my dad a year later. Together 50+ years. Times have sure changed. That would be outlawed today.
Posted on 2/5/26 at 9:15 am to djmed
Meanwhile, female teachers can screw 11 year old boys, serve a month in local jail, and get a job in the next state
Posted on 2/5/26 at 9:21 am to lsu777
quote:
he deserves an arse whooping
quote:
a 6th-grade teacher and high school wrestling coach
He'd beat you like a yard dog that stole chicken off the picnic table.
Posted on 2/5/26 at 9:29 am to idlewatcher
quote:
Also, he got a $100K bail What in the heck. Murderers get less of a bond.
My guess he's YT, which is why he got that bail.
Posted on 2/5/26 at 9:31 am to djmed
Nation of laws jumped shark long ago
Posted on 2/5/26 at 10:03 am to armytiger96
quote:
Just because they were both the of majority age doesn't mean they were two legal adults.
She was out of school and of age
All the standards we as a society have agreed on that make her an adult
quote:
Whether or not you, me, or the dumbass coach agrees with the law is irrelevant. It's still the law and he broke it!
Right...it's an overreaching law
Page 5 of 6
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News