Favorite team:LSU 
Location:Parts Unknown
Biography:
Interests:
Occupation:
Number of Posts:58980
Registered on:1/30/2007
Online Status:Not Online

Recent Posts

Message
From LA Times:

quote:

At the Burbank City Hall chambers packed with Hollywood union workers, community advocates and journalists, Sen. Adam Schiff (D-Calif.) laid out the cost of losing local film and TV production:

More than 42,000 jobs lost. Livelihoods destroyed. Future opportunities lost.

Increasingly, Schiff said, those jobs are being “lured abroad” by “foreign governments that have invested aggressively in building their own film industries.”

To underscore the point, Schiff cited some sobering data: Last year, 45% of all U.S. films and scripted television shows were shot internationally, up from about 33% in 2022.


I know its Schiff but those numbers are probably verifiable
Friend is a filmmaker. He said we simply cannot compete with the oversees studios. The costs are so much lower that productions are moving to foreign lands.
quote:

The WSJ is a pathetic globalist rag and Kimberly Strassel is a tool


As Dr. House would say, you're an idiot. Strassel is as conservative as they come. She has defended Trump plenty of times . She's also criticized him. In other words, she calls balls and strikes. I know you're type. If someone doesn't agree with you 200% of the time, he is a scumbag and the enemy.

Main point she is making is when the voters have priorities such as inflation etc, this close to the election, the pushing of Hollywood is a waste of political capital and gets him no votes. None of that is false.

A shame we don't have Newt in the House. At least we would have an agenda.
Kimberly Strassel in today's WSJ. How big of a mistake is it? Schiff is suddenly welcoming the "bipartisanship"

quote:

Republicans are fighting for their midterm lives, so it’s something to watch the president finally rally them together with a plan to lock down the Hollywood academy and California’s liberal political class.

And the Oscar for Most Self-Defeating Politics goes to . . .

“I am going to suggest that Republicans and Democrats get together, and immediately craft Legislation to save the Movie, Television, and Entertainment Business in America. Congress should approve, immediately, a Federal Production Incentive to create Entertainment Jobs in America,” Donald Trump enthused on Truth Social Monday. This was followed by a Tuesday post praising the “great bipartisan response” to his great Hollywood bailout, then by yet another, of the president thumbs-upping it with his Hollywood ambassador, Jon Voight.

Feel better, voters. As gas prices rise, the president has George Clooney, Jeff Katzenberg, Sen. Adam Schiff and Gov. Gavin Newsom, covered.

The congressional response to adding billions in Hollywood subsidies to $40 trillion in debt was notable, if not “great.” Republicans—unable to pass capital-gains relief for homeowners or basic online safety legislation, or even to fund the military—finally found an oppressed class worth uniting for: studio barons and megastars. “Whatever we can do to be supportive is a good thing,” Florida Rep. Vern Buchanan saluted, taking a break from deficit laments. Plans are already afoot to drive a bill through the House Ways and Means Committee. Expect the topic to be central at next week’s GOP “midterm convention” in Texas. The implicit Republican 2026 message: Make Mark Ruffalo Great Again.

Democrats hear Christmas bells. The California delegation (85% Democrats) has made a cause of this bailout, and Mr. Schiff held a hearing on the proposal in March. The California senator—who as a representative led the charge to impeach the president twice—proposes Republicans and Democrats “work together . . . to get this done, and bring the movie magic back to America.” Mr. Newsom, who last year proposed a $7.5 billion federal tax credit, abandoned his previously scheduled Trump trolling and on Monday gold-stamped the president’s plan with: “Amen. Let’s make it happen.” It’s “The Good, the Bad and the Ugly,” D.C.-spending style.

On the merits, the proposal is dreadful. Yes, the U.S. has seen a big drop in domestic movie production, partly a function of a global industry’s adjusting to streaming services and falling ticket sales. The issue is cost. And no surprise California has led the way in shedding slots. Of the estimated 100,000 industry jobs nationwide lost since 2022, the biggest chunk dropped from the Los Angeles area. What movie-maker is eager to engage in a state with onerous “above the line” taxes, insane regulations, and actor and writer guilds that strike with the regularity of the ticking clock in “High Noon”? It isn’t a trick question.

One solution—the one that ignores underlying economic reality, but makes politicians look proactive—is to join in the global subsidy race to the bottom, trying to lure production back with more giveaways at taxpayer expense. The president’s claim that “money spent on Tax Incentives will be made up tenfold by the money pouring into the Treasury’s coffers” is fantasy. California last year doubled its own film credit, and here we are. The other solution—less politically fun, lacking in spending gratification—is to demand California save its own industry, and its broader self, by reversing policies that are driving a “Ten Commandments”-style exodus from its state.

But it’s the politics that are most self-sabotaging. The latest Reuters/Ipsos poll shows the single top issue this midterm for a plurality of Americans is the cost of living, and that 71% of respondents disapprove of Mr. Trump’s handling of that problem. The country wants Republicans to provide them concrete wins on live issues: gasoline prices, inflation, taxes. Yet polls show the party’s message, which now hinges on the year-ago accomplishment of a reconciliation bill—isn’t landing. That’s in part because the main messenger keeps bouncing from threats against Iran to vaccine plot theory to arguments over the appropriate name for the body of water between Rochester, N.Y., and Toronto.

There is at least continuity in the White House now positioning the GOP to roar into a midterm sprint as lead advocates for the Chanel class (just as that group gears up to bash the president at the Emmys, the Grammys and the Golden Globes). It’s in keeping with the spring-through-summer obsession with other topics that blare a disconnect from average concerns, say a $400 million, 90,000-square-foot, gilded ballroom. The GOP isn’t only failing to get its message across; it’s actively making itself look oblivious. It was a similar disconnect that helped Democrats lose in 2024.

Mr. Trump has pledged to spend the final 30 days before the election stumping for the GOP. He can use those stops to reassure voters that Republicans will improve their day-to-day lives—or he can pledge to spend their money on Tinsel Town. Those messages don’t go together.


Vance did. Philip Klein in National Review:


quote:


In addition to his direct refusal to condemn Carlson, these are the Vance comments that drew the most scrutiny:

What I say to the people, like the root of antisemitism, the core of antisemitism to me, is the idea of blood libel. The idea that because of your genetics, because of your blood, because of your ancestry, you are guilty of a crime that you never committed. And I think that blood libel, which is at the root of antisemitism, is the exact opposite of the Christian gospel. And because of that, I believe the gospel is actually the solution to this.

Vance completely distorted what “blood libel” actually means. In reality, what it refers to is the idea that Jews regularly kill Christians as part of secret rituals, the most notorious example being the idea that the blood of Christian babies is used for the making of Passover matzot. The modern equivalents of blood libels are the litany of claims of supposed Jewish misdeeds, particularly the hoaxes about Israel committing genocide and inducing mass starvation in Gaza.

“Blood guilt” is the idea that all Jews are genetically responsible for the crimes of a single Jew, or for crimes that other Jews committed in the past. The idea of blood guilt was most relevant to historical forms of antisemitism — such as hating all Jews because “Jews killed Jesus.” The “blood guilt” line is one that Carlson himself has used to brush aside accusations that he has engaged in antisemitism.

So, whether intentionally or out of ignorance, Vance defined antisemitism in a way that conveniently absolves his friend Carlson. No, Carlson isn’t saying that every Jew today is guilty of killing Jesus. But what he is doing is going on air every day and spreading lies and conspiracies accusing Jews, and Israel, of bloody misdeeds and weaving it into a sinister conspiracy of global control.

re: Clancy Jury Is At 11 - 1?

Posted by prplhze2000 on 9/4/26 at 9:14 am to
Problem is Mass. law.

In the Carly Gregg case here, defense had to prove she was insane.

In Mass., the state has to prove BEYOND A REASONABLE doubt she is NOT insane. Very hard.

Also, McNaughton is not followed in Mass.
People are British and overwhelmingly voted to remain British. Government sucks right now but it should stay British.
He also made up crap about what the Jewish blood libel is.
and when they finally got him, it was brutal. No mercy.
Nonna Randazzos ships year round. Great King Cakes.
These commercials don't cost that much to produce. It's not like you're spending $50K per.
Notice how many commercials have dropped in the last few weeks for one candidate versus the other.

Nope. Paxton not a lazy campaigner at all.
Just checked again. Nothing filed.
When a party files notice of removal to federal court, the action is usually automatically stayed in state court. Then they slug it out in federal court on whether it belongs there.

Yup, thread was anchored.
No idea. Old one so documents are not online. Just docket.
So you want to go Schindler's List? yeah, that would go over real well. Got to be smart about these things.
Not necessarily.

Might stipulate in the contracts or membership in SEC that venue is that court.

Found another old lawsuit between LSU and SEC. Was in Northern District of Alabama.

Still nothing filed. Bunch of cases popped up so if it was filed overnight, probably should appear already. Probably because I can be wrong. They are usually pretty quick on these things though.

Our poster probably heard right, just will be filed later today. Then SEC probably tries to remove the Baton Rouge lawsuit to federal court and consolidate.