- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Latoya recall has failed. Only had 27k signatures. edit: 40k signatures were rejected
Posted on 3/21/23 at 12:29 pm to Tiger985
Posted on 3/21/23 at 12:29 pm to Tiger985
quote:
They were collecting signatures at Mardi Gras parades with no vetting.
Probably people from all across the metro area that thought they could sign.
I got asked. Told them I would sign it but I live in JP. The lady told me thanks for the support though and moved on.
Watched others sign it that got vetted.
0
Posted on 3/21/23 at 12:30 pm to fightin tigers
quote:bullshite he is the top democrat in the state
JBE had nothing to do with the vote count. He just looked at the final number and said not enough
Posted on 3/21/23 at 12:30 pm to BourreTheDog
quote:
He wants one of the two Senate seats
God I’m going to be so fricking pissed when he wins.
Posted on 3/21/23 at 12:30 pm to Cosmo
quote:
slimy cocksucker
Oh yeah, it’s the governor’s fault that a recall of a mayor, who was reelected a few months ago unopposed, failed.
Everybody with brains knew this had no chance in the first place. Even if they got it on the ballot, she would win easily, like Gavin Newsome.
Posted on 3/21/23 at 12:31 pm to whoa
So from I’m reading the initial batch of signatures that they turned in on the deadline had about 21% of signatures rejected (which is inline with the rejection rate for most recalls) but the THIRTY TWO THOUSAND signatures they turned in on day 5 of the 5 day grace period after the deadline were practically all rejected.
So if all of the above is true, it sounds like somewhere in their process was a fatal error that they likely didn’t even know was happening.
Which really shouldn’t be surprising given who was running this shite.
Never forget that the organizers started the clock on collecting signatures and only THEN started to form a game plan of getting the required signatures. They were toast on day 1.
So if all of the above is true, it sounds like somewhere in their process was a fatal error that they likely didn’t even know was happening.
Which really shouldn’t be surprising given who was running this shite.
Never forget that the organizers started the clock on collecting signatures and only THEN started to form a game plan of getting the required signatures. They were toast on day 1.
This post was edited on 3/21/23 at 12:36 pm
Posted on 3/21/23 at 12:32 pm to chalmetteowl
quote:
A lot of Metairie and the Northshore probably didn’t know they couldn’t sign it
They had to list their address, right?
Posted on 3/21/23 at 12:32 pm to Cosmo
quote:
slimy cocksucker
frick that...
Posted on 3/21/23 at 12:33 pm to Modern
quote:
Man…The retaliation from Latoya is about to be vicious.
This city can’t even change a fricking light bulb
Posted on 3/21/23 at 12:33 pm to Fun Bunch
The people who signed are now holding their breath for the eventual repercussions as the names become public record
This post was edited on 3/21/23 at 12:34 pm
Posted on 3/21/23 at 12:36 pm to JohnnyKilroy
quote:
but the FORTY THOUSAND signatures they turned in during the 5 day grace period after the deadline were practically all rejected.
When I first read that I thougth maybe it was a duplication issue but that only explains 4K of that 40K.
There needs to be explanation about what happened with the other signatures.
Posted on 3/21/23 at 12:37 pm to Fun Bunch
Shocking development
Posted on 3/21/23 at 12:38 pm to SlidellCajun
quote:
The people who signed are now holding their breath for the eventual repercussions as the names become public record
What's the worst that can happen, they get carjacked at gunpoint?
Posted on 3/21/23 at 12:43 pm to Fun Bunch
Why is the city registrar of voters the arbiter here? Imo this should fall under the purview of the sos as to avoid any conflicts of interest.
Posted on 3/21/23 at 12:45 pm to JohnnyKilroy
quote:
So from I’m reading the initial batch of signatures that they turned in on the deadline had about 21% of signatures rejected (which is inline with the rejection rate for most recalls) but the THIRTY TWO THOUSAND signatures they turned in on day 5 of the 5 day grace period after the deadline were practically all rejected. So if all of the above is true, it sounds like somewhere in their process was a fatal error that they likely didn’t even know was happening.
Or they turned in the strong batch first and their own internal audit concerns later to minimize the time the registrar would have them in hand
Posted on 3/21/23 at 12:47 pm to MrJimBeam
quote:
She doesn't have as many friends these days.
Posted on 3/21/23 at 12:48 pm to Fun Bunch
If it means anything, removing Teedy would do basically nothing as Chicago will soon find out. When the problem is the city itself, changing passive mayor for passive mayor won't do anything.
Posted on 3/21/23 at 12:48 pm to Godfather1
quote:Two things at once from what I’ve seen.
JBE has his eyes on bigger things.
Posted on 3/21/23 at 12:49 pm to whoa
quote:
I have zero faith any local governments in Louisiana could handle a recall correctly and without interference
Of course there was tampering. The boxes containing signature sheets were left in the middle of the registrars office and not behind any locked doors. This issue was raised during the court proceedings but never cleared up by office of registrar
Posted on 3/21/23 at 12:49 pm to JohnnyKilroy
quote:
So from I’m reading the initial batch of signatures that they turned in on the deadline had about 21% of signatures rejected (which is inline with the rejection rate for most recalls) but the THIRTY TWO THOUSAND signatures they turned in on day 5 of the 5 day grace period after the deadline were practically all rejected.
Yep:
26,000 of the rejected signatures from the second batch were tagged as “other” for the reason.
Posted on 3/21/23 at 12:52 pm to lostinbr
They should break down per other code
I’d like to know how many were rejected for profanity
Also what does unable to verify petitioner intent mean?
I’d like to know how many were rejected for profanity
Also what does unable to verify petitioner intent mean?
Page 4 of 13
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News