- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics

grizzlylongcut
| Favorite team: | LSU |
| Location: | |
| Biography: | |
| Interests: | |
| Occupation: | |
| Number of Posts: | 15237 |
| Registered on: | 9/17/2021 |
| Online Status: | Not Online |
Recent Posts
Message
re: Let’s discuss MACV-SOG & LRRP
Posted by grizzlylongcut on 4/17/26 at 6:29 am to Clames
quote:
they were doing a lot with little to nothing
That’s putting it lightly.
re: One of the most relaxing lazy rivers ever at a water park?
Posted by grizzlylongcut on 4/17/26 at 6:23 am to FLTech
Why is it always
Well, never mind
Well, never mind
re: Let’s discuss MACV-SOG & LRRP
Posted by grizzlylongcut on 4/16/26 at 8:24 pm to SoFla Tideroller
quote:
Semper Fi to the White Feather
Gunny Hathcock was one of one.
re: Let’s discuss MACV-SOG & LRRP
Posted by grizzlylongcut on 4/16/26 at 8:23 pm to CaptJJ
quote:
listened to that episode with Dynamite Dick Thompson on the Shawn Ryan show,
Listening to it right now
re: Let’s discuss MACV-SOG & LRRP
Posted by grizzlylongcut on 4/16/26 at 8:15 pm to Loup
quote:
swear that soldiers, engineers, and tech guys jerk off to long acronyms
Nobody wants to type out Military Assistance Command Vietnam Studies & Observations Group
re: Happy Librarians day
Posted by grizzlylongcut on 4/16/26 at 8:06 pm to OWLFAN86
Let’s discuss MACV-SOG & LRRP
Posted by grizzlylongcut on 4/16/26 at 8:04 pm
Specifically, are those dudes the baddest mfs the US military ever produced? Reading stories and listening to podcasts about them and I’m really astounded that any of em ever came back.
re: Shannon Elizabeth Joins OnlyFans
Posted by grizzlylongcut on 4/16/26 at 7:40 am to dallastiger55
Jim really and truly was a frick up.
re: What's up with these "Teen Takeover" events happening on Jawja beaches?
Posted by grizzlylongcut on 4/16/26 at 7:29 am to justsaygeaux2
When you consider their kin in Africa use cow shite to make bowls and their floors, etc. it’s not hard to see why they are the way they are.
re: NY Times questioning statue of Texas Rangers at Rangers ballpark
Posted by grizzlylongcut on 4/15/26 at 5:43 pm to CunningLinguist
The Rangers aren’t going to take it down so this guy can frick right off.
re: Yute kills man that took him in and tried to help him?
Posted by grizzlylongcut on 4/15/26 at 12:02 pm to Night Vision
Typical
re: Muslim prayer room created in Vatican Apostolic library?
Posted by grizzlylongcut on 4/15/26 at 12:01 pm to TheChosenOne
quote:
remember this blowing up 5-6 months ago. It turns out they didn't create a prayer room for muslims. They allow muslims to pray in a side room that has carpet.
That sounds an awful lot like a fricking prayer room for Muslims.
They shouldn’t be allowed, period.
re: Favorability of Israel hits -47 points among US men younger than 50
Posted by grizzlylongcut on 4/15/26 at 6:12 am to Bernie Bierman
quote:
Judeo-Christian
End this retarded phrase. We were founded as a Christian nation. Not some cross between of the Christians and Christ killers.
re: Do you take offense to being called the n word?
Posted by grizzlylongcut on 4/15/26 at 6:02 am to IT_Dawg
quote:
No. I laugh at people who use language like that because they aren’t intelligent enough to come up with something better to say.
Idk, judging by how upset it makes em, I’d say it’s a pretty effective word.
re: Senate GOP ‘prepared’ to confirm Alito SCOTUS Replacement before Midterm Elections
Posted by grizzlylongcut on 4/14/26 at 10:23 pm to cajunangelle
Look at how fricking old Grassley is.
re: Virginia Governor Abigail signs bill into law giving all electoral college votes to winner
Posted by grizzlylongcut on 4/14/26 at 9:57 pm to SlowFlowPro
quote:
And? There is nothing that prevents a state from using the popular vote to determine its EC representatives.
Except for the will of the people in your own motherfricking state you dumbass. If this is allowed to stand, then there will be no point in voting in Virginia anymore. Except for around 250 fricking years of precedent.
quote:
Make no mistake, states could actually disenfranchise their voters, but this particular system doesn't do that.
You keep saying this, it doesn’t make it true. It absolutely is the state doing that. Because if a candidate wins the election in your state then guess what? The people elected him! If your state decides that their electoral college votes be thrown behind whoever wins the national popular vote (which doesn’t matter at-fricking-all, mind you) then your state just failed to do the will of the people! It disenfranchised its people! What is impossible for your pedantic, douchebag brain to get about it?
Is this the system the founders had in mind when they created the electoral college?
quote:
Only if it's not counted in the national tally.
It’s not counted in the national tally you dumb frick! It literally doesn’t matter who wins the popular vote! That isn’t how this system is designed holy shite.
You have to be the biggest cocksucking faggót on this entire site man. You fricking know your argument is bullshite and you fricking know what you’re spouting is wrong. Why you’re allowed to continue to post on this site is beyond me; and I generally am 100% against banning people. But you’re the exception. You need to be banned from here. You’re one of the most derided people here, wayyyyy moreso than anyone else I see. It isn’t that you’re constantly in the wrong. It’s the manner in which you do it so confidently, so arrogantly, and so smugly.
You desperately needed to have your arse whipped many times when you were growing up.
re: Evangelicals turning on Catholics all of a sudden.
Posted by grizzlylongcut on 4/14/26 at 9:45 pm to aubie101
Couldn’t imagine why Protestants might dislike Catholics.
re: Virginia Governor Abigail signs bill into law giving all electoral college votes to winner
Posted by grizzlylongcut on 4/14/26 at 9:35 pm to SlowFlowPro
quote:
That has nothing to do with the votes counting in both systems, mind you.
There is no other system you cocksucking loser. We don’t elect via the popular vote
re: Virginia Governor Abigail signs bill into law giving all electoral college votes to winner
Posted by grizzlylongcut on 4/14/26 at 9:32 pm to SlowFlowPro
quote:
That's the flaw in your argument. You're only assigning the state-based value to the vote and pretending it has no value in the national vote, when it clearly does.
Hey dickhead, the one truly “national” vote we have is the presidency. Which isn’t determined by the popular vote. It’s determined by the electoral college. Therefore giving your state’s electoral votes to the winner of the popular vote nationally flies in the face of the very system we have set up here. If your state votes for the candidate who didn’t win the popular vote then guess what? Your vote is disenfranchised under this system.
Which you knew that of course. But between all the bullshite you spew I’m sure you got your wires crossed.
re: Virginia Governor Abigail signs bill into law giving all electoral college votes to winner
Posted by grizzlylongcut on 4/14/26 at 9:26 pm to SlowFlowPro
quote:
They're votes count under both scenarios, though.
Please, explain it. How?
re: Virginia Governor Abigail signs bill into law giving all electoral college votes to winner
Posted by grizzlylongcut on 4/14/26 at 9:23 pm to SlowFlowPro
quote:
If your vote counts the same as everyone else's, then you're not disenfranchised.
It doesn’t you piece of shite.
quote:
HB965 says that all of Virginia’s Electoral College votes will go to the winner of the national popular vote, no matter who wins the popular vote in our Commonwealth.
What’s hard to understand here? What aren’t you quite grasping? If candidate A wins the popular vote in your state but your state enacted some bullshite legislation that says regardless of how your state voted, all electoral votes will be thrown to whomever wins the popular vote nationally, whether it’s candidate A or B, how the frick is that not gross disenfranchisement of voters?
I’d love to see your record in a courtroom since you like to play the constitutional savant attorney on this site.
I’m not sure what the hell type of name this sham falls under but it damn sure ain’t republicanism.
Popular
0












