
- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
Posted on 8/1/26 at 2:58 pm to Cycledude
quote:
from 12 Million people in 1950 to 120 Million in 2026.

Posted on 8/1/26 at 2:58 pm to Cycledude
quote:
How in the world are they not all starving?
Who told you that they aren’t?
Posted on 8/1/26 at 2:59 pm to VooDude
quote:While they're on State's list of "do not visit" places for us at home. Not that I don't get why.
US aid mostly
Posted on 8/1/26 at 3:07 pm to Cycledude
Why do people just assume data is accurate? Thats how dumb Covid shite happened.
Posted on 8/1/26 at 3:12 pm to Cycledude
They have one of, if not the highest, fertility rates in the world. They average like 6 births per women.
Posted on 8/1/26 at 3:38 pm to forkedintheroad
quote:
Im fairly certain the growth of any African countries can be traced to guilt.
Posted on 8/1/26 at 4:03 pm to Cycledude
Was it really only 12 million or was that the census takers’ best estimate?
Posted on 8/1/26 at 4:07 pm to Cycledude
Well first things first: should you assume a 1950's Belgian Congo census was accurate? I mean, who was trecking through the jungle to go to the next village and start counting heads?
Posted on 8/1/26 at 4:10 pm to FearlessFreep
A bunch of births: Hindu Nuffins in India and Dindus in Congo.
Posted on 8/1/26 at 4:19 pm to BZ504
quote:What difference does it make if it’s off a little bit? The point is their population is skyrocketing.
Well first things first: should you assume a 1950's Belgian Congo census was accurate?
Posted on 8/1/26 at 4:35 pm to Cycledude
Ebola will be along in a few years to even things out.
Posted on 8/1/26 at 4:47 pm to forkedintheroad
quote:
Im fairly certain the growth of any African countries can be traced to USAID
Well, not anymore, because that program has all but been shut down.
I wonder where that money is going now….
Posted on 8/1/26 at 5:18 pm to UptownJoeBrown
Crazy thing is India is at 1.9 births per female which is slightly below replacement level. Young people every where (except Africa) aren’t making love like they used to.
Posted on 8/1/26 at 5:18 pm to Spankum
Submitting without comment
1950 world population: 2.5 billion
2026 world population: 8.4 billion
1950 US population: 141 million
2026 US population: 349 million
1950 China population: 544 million
2026 China population: 1.5 billion
1950 Africa population: 227 million
2026 Africa population: 1.5 billion
1950 Vatican City population: 1,000
2026 Vatican City population: 850
1950 Monaco population: 19,666
2026 Monaco population: 38,050
1950 Greenland population: 23,642
2026 Greenland population: 55,629
1950 Australia population: 8.18 million
2026 Australia population: 28 million
1950 world population: 2.5 billion
2026 world population: 8.4 billion
1950 US population: 141 million
2026 US population: 349 million
1950 China population: 544 million
2026 China population: 1.5 billion
1950 Africa population: 227 million
2026 Africa population: 1.5 billion
1950 Vatican City population: 1,000
2026 Vatican City population: 850
1950 Monaco population: 19,666
2026 Monaco population: 38,050
1950 Greenland population: 23,642
2026 Greenland population: 55,629
1950 Australia population: 8.18 million
2026 Australia population: 28 million
Posted on 8/1/26 at 5:35 pm to Cycledude
Man at a quick glance, I thought I read Chicago
Posted on 8/1/26 at 5:55 pm to Cycledude
It’s the Congo. Mango trees grow out of sidewalk cracks there
Posted on 8/1/26 at 6:00 pm to Cycledude
I do think that Congo will have less of an ability to provide for itself than the US did. But FWIW, the US population grew from 5,308,483 in 1800 to 50,189,209 in 1880. Not that much different than the Congo in a similar length of time.
Posted on 8/1/26 at 6:37 pm to Cycledude
quote:
That’s a tenfold increase in only 76 years.
You are bad at math.
Posted on 8/1/26 at 7:33 pm to Cycledude
quote:
How in the world are they not all starving?
Humans are pretty capable survivors.

Popular
Back to top



0












