- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
weagle1999
| Favorite team: | |
| Location: | |
| Biography: | |
| Interests: | |
| Occupation: | |
| Number of Posts: | 2749 |
| Registered on: | 5/11/2025 |
| Online Status: | Not Online |
Recent Posts
Message
re: Is it possible to keep a country if almost everything is subservient to the profit motive?
Posted by weagle1999 on 5/1/26 at 11:33 am to LemmyLives
I included that point just to illustrate that the ‘American values’ that many people champion are in reality subservient to money and consumption. :cheers:
I think from an historical perspective one could make the case that much (most?) of American history was shaped by the desire to reduce labor costs.
I think from an historical perspective one could make the case that much (most?) of American history was shaped by the desire to reduce labor costs.
re: Is it possible to keep a country if almost everything is subservient to the profit motive?
Posted by weagle1999 on 5/1/26 at 11:31 am to Ag Zwin
quote:
Only one of those is anywhere close to being driven by a “profit” motive.
Illegals are building houses and picking fruit to reduce labor costs.
Sodas are still included in SNAP because PepsiCo wants to sell as much as possible (maybe that is cronyism).
Americans selling business to foreigners because they value money over keeping things owned by Americans.
re: Is it possible to keep a country if almost everything is subservient to the profit motive?
Posted by weagle1999 on 5/1/26 at 11:28 am to Zach
quote:
Democrats did not open the border for illegals and create welfare in order to make money. They wanted votes to stay in power.
I agree. But many Republicans are giving them jobs.
re: House just voted against banning soda from SNAP
Posted by weagle1999 on 4/30/26 at 9:33 pm to bigjoe1
re: House just voted against banning soda from SNAP
Posted by weagle1999 on 4/30/26 at 9:01 pm to El Segundo Guy
quote:
It has nothing to do with health and everything to do with $. Coke and Frito Lay are throwing cash to make sure this stuff doesn't pass.
Nothing will ever change.
re: House just voted against banning soda from SNAP
Posted by weagle1999 on 4/30/26 at 8:59 pm to RUFshreve
The PepsiCo representative is here everyone.
House just voted against banning soda from SNAP
Posted by weagle1999 on 4/30/26 at 8:50 pm
Per Nancy Mace.
—-
A coalition of House Democrats and Republicans defeated a push on Wednesday to ban SNAP beneficiaries from using Food Stamps to purchase sugary drinks like soda.
In a 237-to-287 vote, the House blocked an amendment to the farm bill by Rep. Keith Self (R-TX) banning Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program (SNAP) benefits from being used to purchase soda.
"The House just voted against banning soda from SNAP," Rep. Nancy Mace (R-SC) said in a post on X. Why should the government fund your soda purchases?
—-
A coalition of House Democrats and Republicans defeated a push on Wednesday to ban SNAP beneficiaries from using Food Stamps to purchase sugary drinks like soda.
In a 237-to-287 vote, the House blocked an amendment to the farm bill by Rep. Keith Self (R-TX) banning Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program (SNAP) benefits from being used to purchase soda.
"The House just voted against banning soda from SNAP," Rep. Nancy Mace (R-SC) said in a post on X. Why should the government fund your soda purchases?
re: AI controlled vehicle kill switches appear to be coming to new vehicles later this year
Posted by weagle1999 on 4/30/26 at 8:46 pm to jrodLSUke
Maybe we could submit a blood sample every time that we want to start a car?
AI controlled vehicle kill switches appear to be coming to new vehicles later this year
Posted by weagle1999 on 4/30/26 at 8:13 pm
Every so often a law that was passed years ago quietly becomes a present-day compliance reality. Section 24220 of the 2021 Infrastructure Investment and Jobs Act is one of those laws. Tucked into an eleven-hundred-page infrastructure bill with little public debate, the “kill switch law” as it has come to be known by some, awaits implementing regulations. The law has triggered debates in Congress seeking to defund the law, as well as lots of hand wringing around privacy and data governance questions that businesses, fleet operators, and their legal counsel are trying to answer before the technology becomes standard equipment in new vehicles.
What the Law Actually Requires
Section 24220 directs the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA) to require that all new passenger vehicles be equipped with what the statute calls “advanced drunk and impaired driving prevention technology.” In practical terms, the law contemplates two types of systems:
A passive performance-monitoring system that continuously observes a driver’s behavior and restricts or prevents vehicle operation if the system determines the driver may be impaired;
or
A blood-alcohol detection system that prevents or limits operation when BAC meets or exceeds the legal limit of 0.08%.
LINK
What the Law Actually Requires
Section 24220 directs the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA) to require that all new passenger vehicles be equipped with what the statute calls “advanced drunk and impaired driving prevention technology.” In practical terms, the law contemplates two types of systems:
A passive performance-monitoring system that continuously observes a driver’s behavior and restricts or prevents vehicle operation if the system determines the driver may be impaired;
or
A blood-alcohol detection system that prevents or limits operation when BAC meets or exceeds the legal limit of 0.08%.
LINK
re: 2026 Formula 1 (F1) Season Thread
Posted by weagle1999 on 4/30/26 at 7:30 pm to MississippiLebowski
Nice.
re: Andy Serkis explains why he changed Orwell's iconic 'Animal Farm' ending for new movie
Posted by weagle1999 on 4/30/26 at 7:16 pm to FredBear
quote:
It's pretty chilling what's going on in our media and entertainment industries
Have you ever looked at show credits or researched the background of the people who run those companies?
re: Is it possible to keep a country if almost everything is subservient to the profit motive?
Posted by weagle1999 on 4/30/26 at 7:13 pm to Sofaking2
I can’t say I disagree with much of that.
But I can’t unsee the hordes of non-US workers building new houses and picking fruit, or the dot people running our gas stations and hotels. All of that is back to Americans wanting of maximize profit.
But I can’t unsee the hordes of non-US workers building new houses and picking fruit, or the dot people running our gas stations and hotels. All of that is back to Americans wanting of maximize profit.
re: Is it possible to keep a country if almost everything is subservient to the profit motive?
Posted by weagle1999 on 4/30/26 at 7:05 pm to Frank Belavis
Another good point and related to a question I asked on here once: Is our economy just supposed to grow forever, into infinity? How is that sustainable?
re: Is it possible to keep a country if almost everything is subservient to the profit motive?
Posted by weagle1999 on 4/30/26 at 7:03 pm to Madking
That is a great point.
Lost in all the ‘celebration’ about when women entered the workforce en masse is the fact that the value of labor dropped.
Almost like it was planned, huh?
Lost in all the ‘celebration’ about when women entered the workforce en masse is the fact that the value of labor dropped.
Almost like it was planned, huh?
Is it possible to keep a country if almost everything is subservient to the profit motive?
Posted by weagle1999 on 4/30/26 at 6:59 pm
I can’t help but think that many of the problems in the US that most of us want solved originated with someone wanting to make more money.
Illegals, foreign owned businesses, welfare, take your pick.
I also think that many of us are fooling ourselves about what America is really about now. Our culture revolves around money and consumption foremost (I think).
Illegals, foreign owned businesses, welfare, take your pick.
I also think that many of us are fooling ourselves about what America is really about now. Our culture revolves around money and consumption foremost (I think).
re: Two days in Boise, Idaho
Posted by weagle1999 on 4/30/26 at 6:11 pm to Suntiger
I liked the wineries close by. And I rode over to Sun Valley and visited Papa’s memorial.
re: US House PASSED amendment to Farm Bill to BAN US foreign adversaries from buying US farmla
Posted by weagle1999 on 4/30/26 at 6:07 pm to Ailsa
quote:
Farm Bill
aka ‘Agriculture Welfare Bill’
re: 2026 Formula 1 (F1) Season Thread
Posted by weagle1999 on 4/30/26 at 6:07 pm to MississippiLebowski
I wish we could see more pictures of the women who work for the teams :pimp:
re: Ohio is trying to compete with California for gas prices
Posted by weagle1999 on 4/30/26 at 3:29 pm to CatsGoneWild
quote:
northern Ohio
Yuck.
re: Interesting or unusual automobiles that you have seen lately
Posted by weagle1999 on 4/29/26 at 9:50 pm to CBDTiger
Man there can’t be too many of those still around.
re: Interesting or unusual automobiles that you have seen lately
Posted by weagle1999 on 4/29/26 at 7:32 pm to PoorOtis
Dangit I thought I typed 1986.
Popular
1












