Indefatigable

quote:

---

God forbid they have to figure out a way to work with constituents that don’t agree with them to stay in office.

---

This is peak irony from any person supporting partisan gerrymandering.

quote:

---

Nah. I understand why you embellish your position though - it’ll blow away in the wind if it ain’t given a little extra weight.

---

When this first started, did we not proclaim that the Strait was open and would remain open?

quote:

---

What do we get (demonstrate) by restraining exactly as we've done?

---

Nothing, that I’m aware of.

I’m trying to put together how any resolution here can be a win for the United States.

Unless everyone’s hiding the ball and Iran is giving up the uranium, basically any term possible is worse than status quo ante.

The party line will be “but they promised to do X and Y with their nuclear materials and limit enrichment”. The hilarious retort will inevitably be “these terms are weaker than the JCPOA”.

quote:

---

But the argument for it is that processing times have become erratic as the USPS shut down local sorting centers. What should matter is the postmark day because the received day is, to some extent or another, outside the control of the voter.

---

Move the mail in received date up a couple days. Incredibly simple, problem solved.

quote:

---

I don't even know what it is. Is it people who like Trump, hate Trump, are worried he's doing something people won't like... what?

---

It’s essentially the people they are running out of office, the party, and the MAGA movement on the basis of purity tests centered around non-conservative positions that the President has taken. Loyalty test.

That same trend is why the GOP will be taken out back and beaten in November. Trump and company are cutting off their nose to spite their face.

quote:

---

And yet where the frick are they challenging unconstitutional districts across the country in places like Illinois and California?

---

Unfortunately partisan gerrymandering is entirely legal at present.

That’s what happens in those places.

Louisiana’s map was only found unconstitutional because it was drawn with the sole consideration of creating a black majority district. Which of course, was by design to get that exact ruling, but it isn’t an expansive one.

For SC or GA or AL or anywhere else’s districts to be “illegal”, they would have to be challenged and a judge find that they are racial gerrymanders. Only Louisiana’s map was ruled on.

quote:

---

the GOPs plan to hand the midterms to democrats

---

If the Democrats take the house, it’s not going to be by a district or two. Nothing Indiana and South Carolina chose not to do will matter either way.

I mean I guess right on brother.

But unserious adherence to nonsense just to own the libs is going to result in bad things, soon. It’s going to lose elections.

I don’t care, but for curiosity’s sake…why?

Columbus never touched foot in what would become the US.

Depends on the professional skill and organizational position of the doctor whose marriage they inevitably ruin