62
- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Score Board
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- SEC Score Board
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Coaching Changes
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
Think About It.....Should Landen Clark maybe "Start"?!
Posted on 9/13/26 at 7:46 pm
Posted on 9/13/26 at 7:46 pm
Yea.....I get it! Based on the "Thread Topic/Wording Alone" - it's going to cause immediate negative responses! But read through and try to follow the multi-phased reasoning and logic involved @ this suggested strategy of utilizing what has basically been a "perfect performance" from what we've seen of Landon Clark so far!
To begin.......I've been very impressed with Landon Clark! So have MANY others! Leavitt gives you more upside, perhaps, but is Clark "safer"? Clark looks perfectly capable of moving the ball both in the air and his ability to run. And he looks very confident, secure in running the offense.
Could Landon be started/used to give Leavitt time to mentally adjust? Clark could be given a "trial" start......see how he does, which might surprise everyone, and pull him soon after, or if, he struggles, breaks down!
What have we got to lose? Start him for a series or two.....see how it goes. The reason I'm "thinking" or suggesting this strategy should be obvious after last night. Leavitt is "scary", and somewhat dangerous, at least for now. Landon Clark has not displayed this serious "down side" of turning the ball over like Sam did. Might it be beneficial to give Leavitt some time to "think" on the sidelines?
Now, I know how many here will react, think this is crazy. But IS IT? Has it really been proven which of our QB's performs and is definitively better during games, on the field?!
To begin.......I've been very impressed with Landon Clark! So have MANY others! Leavitt gives you more upside, perhaps, but is Clark "safer"? Clark looks perfectly capable of moving the ball both in the air and his ability to run. And he looks very confident, secure in running the offense.
Could Landon be started/used to give Leavitt time to mentally adjust? Clark could be given a "trial" start......see how he does, which might surprise everyone, and pull him soon after, or if, he struggles, breaks down!
What have we got to lose? Start him for a series or two.....see how it goes. The reason I'm "thinking" or suggesting this strategy should be obvious after last night. Leavitt is "scary", and somewhat dangerous, at least for now. Landon Clark has not displayed this serious "down side" of turning the ball over like Sam did. Might it be beneficial to give Leavitt some time to "think" on the sidelines?
Now, I know how many here will react, think this is crazy. But IS IT? Has it really been proven which of our QB's performs and is definitively better during games, on the field?!
This post was edited on 9/15/26 at 3:01 pm
Posted on 9/13/26 at 7:46 pm to KidCreole
Landon Clark is very good
Posted on 9/13/26 at 7:47 pm to KidCreole
I’m not opposed to the idea. Keeps egos in check
Posted on 9/13/26 at 7:48 pm to KidCreole
The backup is always the best player in the country
Yes, he has looked good in garbage time. But let’s trust Lane on this one.
Yes, he has looked good in garbage time. But let’s trust Lane on this one.
Posted on 9/13/26 at 7:49 pm to KidCreole
Wouldn't do it this week. Perhaps a quick hook though
Posted on 9/13/26 at 7:49 pm to KidCreole
stfuPosted on 9/13/26 at 7:49 pm to KidCreole
I trust Lane
Posted on 9/13/26 at 7:51 pm to KidCreole
The coaches know waaaaaay better than the rant. One word, experience. Leavitt was trying to do too much. The guy competes.
Posted on 9/13/26 at 7:52 pm to KidCreole
quote:
Leavitt gives you more upside, perhaps, but is Clark "safer"?
Then start Leavitt. We're playing to win a championship not to win the capital one bowl. To win it all you need your best to play their best
But idk how you can tell who has the most upside and who's the safest already
This post was edited on 9/13/26 at 7:54 pm
Posted on 9/13/26 at 7:53 pm to KidCreole
Here comes the Nuss bus should start over Jayden Daniels crowd. The real football geniuses.
Posted on 9/13/26 at 7:53 pm to KidCreole
Don’t even let Leavitt travel with the team. Or clawback 1/12 of his pay after last night. Send a message Lane!
Posted on 9/13/26 at 7:54 pm to mikelsu15
Lane picked Austin Simmons over Chambliss pre-injury
Posted on 9/13/26 at 7:54 pm to KidCreole
Truly a retarded fan base.
Posted on 9/13/26 at 7:54 pm to KidCreole
quote:
Think About It.....Should Landen Clark maybe "Start"?!
I'll be honest, I did not read past this.
The answer, though, is...no.
Posted on 9/13/26 at 7:55 pm to theunknownknight
Thanks for that! I was'nt thinking, and therefore did'nt specifically address the "Ego" aspect, but that is a large part of what I was suggesting.
What is boils down to is:
Does the risk of starting Clark really outweigh the known risk Leavitt has shown!? From what I've seen on the field....No!
Question, which effects my thoughts/strategy about "starting Clark":
When Landon has played, did we have all our First Team/String offensive players like I'm sure we did while Leavitt was in?!
What is boils down to is:
Does the risk of starting Clark really outweigh the known risk Leavitt has shown!? From what I've seen on the field....No!
Question, which effects my thoughts/strategy about "starting Clark":
When Landon has played, did we have all our First Team/String offensive players like I'm sure we did while Leavitt was in?!
Posted on 9/13/26 at 7:57 pm to KidCreole
I trust Lane Kiffin with his QB decision making. If there’s one thing I’m confident in, it’s that he’s gonna roll with the best QB.
Chambliss taking Austin Simmons spot at Ole Miss is a perfect example.
Chambliss taking Austin Simmons spot at Ole Miss is a perfect example.
Posted on 9/13/26 at 8:03 pm to SECCaptain
quote:
Lane picked Austin Simmons over Chambliss pre-injury
Not sure what that has to do with it. He managed their QBs deep into the CFP. Are you saying he never picks the right QB?
Posted on 9/13/26 at 8:05 pm to KidCreole
We are two games in and some of y'all are basically saying Lane Kiffin doesn't know how to manage his quarterback personnel.
Think about that for a moment.
Think about that for a moment.
Posted on 9/13/26 at 8:08 pm to KidCreole
Yall did this same bullshite with Michael van Buren jr.
Page 1 of 5
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News