Favorite team:
Location:
Biography:
Interests:
Occupation:
Number of Posts:493
Registered on:11/7/2015
Online Status:Not Online

Recent Posts

Message

re: Don’t want to be party killer

Posted by KidCreole on 10/5/26 at 10:04 pm to

While Mardi Gras & Mardi Gras Beads may not be a big deal to you, I can assure you they are a BIG DEAL to other people & areas throughout the country!

Can't tell you how many times throughout the 80's, 90's that we "Snow Ski'd & Drank for Free" @ the nicest Ski Resorts in Colorado, Utah, New Mexico by simply showing up with Mardi Gras Beads!
Other far cooler, more LSU appropriate/unique and safer (physical & legal) options need to be explored. I blame the legal liability, primarily, due to attorneys. They have sued/killed many companies, things, options out of existence.

Allow the celebrating player to toss really nice, one of a kind "LSU branded/specific Mardi Gras Beads" to the fans in the stadium! That alone would keep those fans who sit behind them, and are always the first to leave, in their seats......for the right type of "limited edition" LSU "throw" could/would be something quite valuable!

The Players would LOVE it and the LSU Fans would Geaux Nuts! And the "tossing of the beads" would be broadcast & talked about nationwide to promote the Tiger Stadium Game Day/Night Experience & Fan Enthusiasm! And it would provide Prime Time + Priceless "Free" Nationwide Advertising to promote Louisiana's awesome Culture, Mardi Gras, Music, Food & Tourism in general!

It's a Great Idea!

re: Clark and Longstreet

Posted by KidCreole on 10/5/26 at 9:17 pm to
Yea, the "56% Elon stat" is a dead giveaway that they are just parroting some statement that they heard someone else say; who heard someone else use it. And now you have a cacophony of fools who simply + mindlessly just blurt it out. For they themselves can not and do not think for themselves..... and are thus unable to cite any other evidence, actual observations or discuss (back it up) as to how/why "Clark is just Terrible"...."Could'nt hit the Side of a Barn"....."Longstreat is way better".

They are all + only "feeling and emotions" - and it's not even their own feelings/emotions - but someone else's that they heard or read. They are dependent followers, never independent thinkers or leaders. Their brains only allow them to see/think......."Oh, good - great play";...."Oh, frick you - you suck"!

Due to the above shallow cognitive level.....the "56% Elon" chirping parrots are not, and really can not, actually even watch the game; or individual/team performances! Their brain is dominated by black or white, like "He was 0 for 5 and ain't accurate". Despite Kiffin saying 2x that Clark played "Good" and was excited, looking forward to seeing his upside!

Throwing out the "56% @ Elon" is such a Tell & Betrayal of their entire mindset, scant knowledge & blindness of Clark's actual performance.

re: Don’t want to be party killer

Posted by KidCreole on 10/5/26 at 5:37 pm to
I agree, and thought/said the same thing while watching the "celebration" several games ago! I "get" the fun, cool, lose, novelty idea involved. But the whole basketball goal dunking thing is potentially fraught with injury & risk! All you have to do is watch to see the "awkwardness" that has been obvious, evident in several players while attempting to perform the jump/dunk move.

And the whole point is that the goal dunking is a unnecessary risk, and not part of the normal/natural risk of injury inherent while playing the game of football! And you are an idiot if you don't think, see the very definite risk involved. And it's not to LSU football players alone.

As bad as it would be if a player should get some type of hand, wrist or foot twist/sprain injury while landing......the media/public relations nightmare & fallout of the injury video, that would be played in a loop, 24/7, over and over, would be very costly.

And even worse still, and far worse it would be, is if "someone else" (spectator, journalist, referee/official, sideline celebrity, opposing team coach/assistant/ball boy, etc. etc.).....were to be hurt while the whole goal dunking activity occurs, which it does/will numerous X's each & every game.

If you've observed, the sideline is literally crowded with all types/sorts of people. Many of them are not watching or aware of the sudden, unscripted, spontaneous celebration. They may be distracted by the whole environment, atmosphere and/or just "moving through" - busy performing some other role/function (photography/video) and simply not aware of the celebration.

And keep in mind that this person/persons don't have to even "be" or actually "get" hurt. Just a mere trip, slip, fall - or nothing - is all it takes! All they have to say is....."Oh, I don't feel right; have a headache, backache, am dizzy; - or whatever!. It would be an Attorney's DREAM CASE & an LSU Legal Nightmare!

Think I'm being outlandish or dramatic? No - you are! Just watch the Goal Post, Metal Ring, Backboard while the players are dunking. The whole basketball goal contraption moves, springs, bounces and has looked/appeared as if it were going to utterly Collapse!

Lane needs to come up with something new, different. The basket ball dunking thing has become tired, stale & lame. It started and was brought over from Ole Miss. LSU & La. can come up with something more novel, unique & fitting.

re: Clark and Longstreet

Posted by KidCreole on 10/5/26 at 3:43 pm to

What I immediately thought while reading the OP's comments was that "This guy has got to be trolling"!?!

All I know is that there is, and has been, some strange, undeserved prejudice against Landen Clark ever since he took his first snaps against Clemson. The guy has looked great to me.

The way Clark moves is very fluent, natural. His eyes/vision and "feel" for the game, team/defense & current play is an innate gift. He just naturally can feel the flow of how the play is progressing, moving......and the effect it is & will have on his opportunities/choices as the field either opens or closes.

Clark could successfully run on just about any/every play; but opposite of Leavitt, he natural instinct is to throw first. And since he is so comfortable and fluent at moving, he always has the time to then "automatically" go through his progressions, check downs and find open receivers down field. Which is precisely what he did on 2 picture perfect touchdown tosses to Watkins....who dropped them both. When comparing, considering everything......Clark has been the more accurate QB!

The reality is that it's not just against OU that ain't a big deal (at all);
but Texas vs Anybody is generally not on anybody's highlight list! It's just not.

In fact, any of the other SEC school's interest in Texas' games is to simply, merely watching/waiting for them to be exposed! Which always happens. For everyone knows that Texas should not be ranked anywhere near where they were put (and not earned)!

There is just no excitement For or In Texas Football! The feeling amongst ALL SEC Schools, Fanbases is that Texas is not part of the SEC. Even if Texas should do good, we don't care and don't want any credit for it.

Hard to put your finger on, but Texas games, fans, atmosphere & their football program just don't have it! The rest of the country just has no excitement or interest in it. It's simply very vanilla.

re: Good reps for Clark

Posted by KidCreole on 10/4/26 at 1:01 am to
quote:

Playing with starters doesn’t make you more accurate


Moronic statements like the above are a good reminder of who (mindset) & what (idiotic) is often posted here on T.D. Don't ever assume you're reading sane thoughts.

The foolish comment would have been easier to fathom had I first noticed/seen that this individual has actually tabulated 292,145 other posts!! Try to imagine almost 300K posts!?!? That is indeed one huge "tell" and/or indicator of the type/level of post quality one should expect.

re: Longstreet > clark

Posted by KidCreole on 10/4/26 at 12:24 am to

Blatantly Incorrect Observation

re: Can we stop the Clark talk

Posted by KidCreole on 10/3/26 at 9:34 pm to
Clark looks as good or better than most other SEC qb’s!

re: Clark can’t throw?

Posted by KidCreole on 10/3/26 at 9:18 pm to
Nothing new. Clark has always looked & played good! His throwing rhythm/form is exceptional. Landen just naturally moves, sets up & reads the field with poised confidence. We are very lucky to have him!

re: Clark can’t throw?

Posted by KidCreole on 10/3/26 at 8:58 pm to
When you consider “everything”….Clark has looked very good in all aspects - throwing & running. He is not inaccurate and actually throws/passes with better feel + touch than Leavitt. Clark looks extremely comfortable @ playing QB
quote:

you are one weird mf ..


Thanks for the compliment!

For here, where the blind indeed abound, the "weird" one eyed man is King!

It was'nt garbage time, when long ago a Mighty Kingdom and Very Wise, Powerful King's very lives were at stake! So the Wise King sent his Mighty, Massive Army & most feared, battle tested Generals, Captains out to face the giant threat. They all failed and were killed. And the end was certain and near.

Then to the King and his subjects great surprise.....a small, humble, full of faith, yet courageous boy named David appeared & he slewed Goliath!
quote:

That would mean Kiffin and company are bad at talent evaluation which would not warrant your trust in them.


I see your point, but I think you missed mine. Or, you're just being a smart arse.

What was clearly conveyed is that I think certain backups might "rise to the occasion/opportunity" to perhaps play above their potential. They might be inspired to "dig deep" for the team and even the injured player they're replacing to produce exceptional performances.

I trust and believe that Kiffin knows how to evaluate players. But if "superior talented player" always outperformed an athlete with lesser talent/ability..... then the outcome of competition would be certain - and their would never be upsets! But we see them all the time, in individual one on one competition (tennis) or team sports where far higher skill, ability & ranked opponents are beaten by an inspired player or team!

Prime example is the US Hockey Team (college amateurs) beating the Vastly Superior Russian (uber professionals) Hockey Team to Win the Gold Medal in the 1980 Olympics held in Lake Placid.

My point, which was clearly made, is that our team has suffered some rather significant injuries, and that these backups are needed and will be playing due to injured players. And that Kiffin is an outstanding coach and that I've never been more confidant in a coach's ability to motivate and extract exceptional performances from these backups.

And that yes, it is possible that they might perform even better than the players they replaced. Case in point is our receiver - Harris, who stepped up to replace injured Green, who I, and many others, would say outperformed even Green last weekend against Texas A&M.

With Injuries forcing "Next Man Up"......I've never felt this confident that our backups will "Up their Games" to Fully Embrace the Opportunity + Challenge!

Kiffin has been ingenious @ how he has addressed the injury predicament the team has been dealt. As Head Coach, Kiffin is once again "10 steps ahead" by accepting and proactively dealing with the unfortunate reality of losing key players.

Lane is truly exceptional leader, motivator & communicator in how he deals with the challenge (opportunity). By admitting, accepting that "It is what it is".......he explains how they will overcome the setback by simply/directly expecting himself, his staff & players to now "Rise to the Occassion". To do your Job!

Kiffin is very effective at communicating his full confidence/trust in each & every coach/staff, player & team the need to now "Up their Game" by individually performing, delivering, executing @ the needed, required level to continue WINNING! That it can, will be done by each person simply performing/executing their individual job/role "one play at a time"!

With Kiffin @ the helm......I've every felt more confident that our backups, with the entire team's/coache's support can & will "rise to the occassion". Hell, I would'nt be surprised if our backups perform even better than those they replaced!
Pretty Good Documentary! I love these "crime" documentaries, and have seen better ones; but since I like them so much - I enjoyed this one and watched all 3 back to back.

Something that has always bothered me, or that I don't completely understand the rational behind it, is that you have to have ALL 12 jurors vote Not Guilty.

You often hear it said that "It's better to let 1,000 "guilty" defendants go free than to convict 1 innocent person"! In our justice system you are also "presumed innocent", which I agree with and understand.

In the second trial, which she should have won, the vote was 7 guilty - 5 innocent! 5 people who deliberated for 5 days clearly had "reasonable doubt"!! Since our justice system clearly protects the accused by making the state prove their case, rather than the accused prove they are innocent.....why do you have to have ALL 12 vote "not guilty" in order to be "win" (released, free)?! Again, is not 5 jurors being unable to convict not "reasonable doubt"!

I can more easily understand the rational of all 12 jurors having to vote guilty to convict. But something has always bothered me about it having to be unanimous to be found "fully" innocent.

Regarding the documentary, and her guilt or innocence, the supreme court should have gone further to "right the wrong" that was done in the first trial. All I can say is that I would'nt want to live in Topeka. There must be something very "odd/weird" (judgemental) about the average person who resides there that make up "a jury of your peers"! These same people are the ones who elect their District Attorney (the crooked first D.A. & Cop in the first trial). And the 2nd D.A. who I still have a hard time understanding how they wanted to try her again after the Supreme Court found NO definitive evidence linking her to the crimes! And the Topeka Kansas "mindset" (people), who includes the D.A., Court & Justice System, Detectives, etc. (they are all "people" who live there - think, believe the same general) who got destroyed in the 2nd Trial......yet wanted to re-try her for the 3rd time!

Don't know if she did it or not. Nothing was proved. However, there WAS PROOF that the prosecution, cops & witness "Did It" (abuse of power, corruption & outright lies/perjury in 1st & 2nd trials)! After the supreme court eviscerated the first DA and clearly found that her right to a fair trial was "criminally" violated........where was the outcry from the community & "good" people of Topeka!?


I agree with the OP and others. Let Leavitt Heal, it's not worth the Risk of playing him!

Do you think Leavitt has some "Magic Force Field Protection" built around him, like some Video Game Characters?!?

Every player on the field is vulnerable to serious, season ending injury, as we just recently witnessed on our key, elite, best players! Perhaps the most vulnerable position/player on the field is the QB. Do you think McNeese or other team's players will just be Nice and not deliver a sack/hit!?. That is their fricking Job!

Do you also think that you can play QB & somehow NOT use every muscle in your body. That he can just "take it easy, magicly just sit in a pocket, not have to move/run or put forceful pressure on both his legs!? He's fricking INJURED, and all the intense athleticism, speed, movement required to play QB will Slow Him Down & Make it Far More Difficult for Him to Maneuver & Avoid being Sacked!

You're fixing to see Landen Clark, and while I won't be surprised, I think many will @ how well he is going to play. How do you know if he might not be better than Leavitt? You Don't!

I think Leavitt is probably the better QB, IF he continues to improve. I just don't know, and neither do you! But Clark may be just as good or even better, and I would like to find out. NO ONE has seen his Upside and/or possible Downside - yet. But what we have seen from Clark is very Positive. He immediately displayed clear/obvious comfort, poise & confidence in running the offense efficiently!

And if Clark should perhaps play surprisingly well, and the offense comes alive......would'nt that be a great thing! And if so, would you not be ecstatic!? I realize that possibility, and the answer to those questions is just far too difficult (traumatic really) for many here to even think about, much less admit. I know I will be happy. And you know who else?

Kiffin

OP: JoeENorthlando

Tiger Droppings not big on Reality.

Knowing really nothing about Leavitt until earlier this month, they were told/sold on him being Great. The 5 Million $ Price Tag also impressed, convinced them he must be good. And deep deep down, from the bottom of their heart/soul, they Wanted him to be. They Needed him to be! That heartfelt dream, intense wish embedded inside a "FANatical" Fan, along with strong desire, intense emotions & huge pride, will often override actual facts, stats, data. Hope does not equal Reality.

Another true fact (reality) is that these "loyal to the death" Leavitt fans still don't really know Sam Leavitt! And are petrified at making any changes, exploring other options, despite Clark playing with very clear, obvious poise/confidence/comfort.

From the little we have seen, despite far less reps and playing with our 2nd/3rd string, he has actually performed better than Sam. (ranter's brains just sploded, gaskets blown out; so I'll back up my statement with definitive proof, but it won't matter).

Kiffin, and every other observer, have been very clear about Sam's "problems". It is a known fact, or "reality". But not so with Clark, where yesterday Kiffin was very clear, positive about Landen playing "Good"; and was excited to see what Landen's upside might be during key/prime game time. Kiffin repeatedly, directly said 2x that Clark "Played Good, Well"! Kiffin further extolled his praise upon Clark by explaining that "Yes, Landen played good, and that the 0 for 5 pass completions stat was very misleading, as he actually tossed 2 touchdown passes that should have been caught"!

I like Sam Leavitt, and also like Landen Clark. We all hope Sam improves, but the "reality" is, he could just as easily remain erratic, inconsistent and somewhat scary, which he has been. I, like Lane Kiffin, am not afraid of "thinking out of the box, being creative, innovative & exploring all options"!

re: Make Tiger Stadium Great Again!

Posted by KidCreole on 9/28/26 at 6:58 pm to

Other Stadiums, Schools Need a Loud Sound System to "fill in the gap", make noise & Do what LSU Fans & Tiger Stadium are known for. Which is the #1 Best, Loudest Fans & Environment.

Let Tiger Stadium be Tiger Stadium!

Let other Stadiums fake/blast the Same, Tired, Gay, Stale music/songs.

It's not a "good look or sound" and misrepresents how/what an engaged, energetic Stadium & Fanbase should have + be during a serious, competitive event/game....which is what Tiger Stadium genuinely offers!

It's a Football Game not a fricking Concert!
quote:

again......The young football players on the field do not want to get hyped up by the tiger marching band. I get that you're sentimental about the band. I happen to like the band. But also understand that those football players on the field want to hear what they like. Which is loud arse rap music.

WRONG!

What young players Want, and what will Pump/Motivate them, and make them want to Come & Play in Tiger Stadium......

Is the Loudest, Earthquake Producing 102K + LSU Fans in the Greatest Sports Coliseum in Earth's History!! NOT RAP MUSIC!

And besides, any player on the sidelines, during a game that is thinking/listening to a Sound System, DJ & what Song is being played is NOT a serious player, not a competitor. Their Focus during a Game/Practice Should Be & Is on their Job/Role/Position on the Team, Not Partying to Loud Music!!

ANYTHING THAT DETRACTS, DISTRACTS FROM HOW/WHAT LSU FANS & TIGER STADIUM - DEATH VALLEY IS KNOWN FOR.......
which is the Undebatable #1 Loudest, Most Passionate, Intimidating Fans + Environment in ALL of Collegiate Sports.......

Should be Eliminated, Stopped! Let Tiger Stadium & LSU Fans provide what it is known for - "The Cathedral of College Sports"!
I disagree about Clark's accuracy, as was shown in the 2 previous games Landen played! He was damned near perfect in accuracy and receptions. He was very accurate & his "timing" was very good (synced with receivers), including great "touch/feel" on the ball, which those 3 traits above are almost as important as accuracy.

Leavitt tends to throw too slow or too fast/hard and makes it difficult on the receiver, which is the reason for many dropped balls that seemed accurately thrown. I saw even TreDez Green, and our other wide receivers, struggle in the previous 3 games with Sam's throws that were placed in their hands.... but still dropped as they lacked that "touch/feel" that makes catches far easier on receivers; and also allows for far more yards after the catch!

Clark is clearly "smoother", more comfortable in passing. The other skill he possess and is very comfortable with is his ability to scramble, throw on the run.........

** While Keeping His Eye Downfield & Finding Open Receivers **