0
- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Score Board
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- SEC Score Board
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Coaching Changes
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Think About It.....Should Landen Clark maybe "Start"?!
Posted on 9/14/26 at 3:28 am to PP7 for heisman
Posted on 9/14/26 at 3:28 am to PP7 for heisman
quote:
Everyone loves Clark so much they don't even know how to spell his first name correctly.
To be fair, some people still still don't know how to spell Kiffen's name.
Posted on 9/14/26 at 4:51 am to Former_5_Star
quote:
Here comes the Nuss bus should start over Jayden Daniels crowd. The real football geniuses.
Start over who? Never heard of her
Posted on 9/14/26 at 5:19 am to KidCreole
Worst post of the year
Posted on 9/14/26 at 5:23 am to Former_5_Star
quote:
Here comes the Nuss bus should start over Jayden Daniels crowd. The real football geniuses.
You think nuss is better than landen? Lol
Posted on 9/14/26 at 7:08 am to Burt Reynolds
that would be your response..miss the whole point.
Posted on 9/14/26 at 7:18 am to KidCreole
Lane will go with Clark eventually!
Posted on 9/14/26 at 7:32 am to Pikes Peak Tiger
quote:
But let’s trust Lane on this one.
Best line in this entire thread.
Posted on 9/14/26 at 7:37 am to KidCreole
Jesus what a difference 1 week makes.
Posted on 9/14/26 at 8:17 am to KidCreole
Don’t disagree with ya. But I say this with confidence (for once) in CLK and company I TRUST
Posted on 9/14/26 at 8:23 am to KidCreole
quote:
Quite obvious that most comments/posters have not, or do not, have the attention span to actually read an entire post,
Certainly not when all your posts read like a retard War and Peace novel.
Posted on 9/14/26 at 8:25 am to KidCreole
quote:
What have we got to lose?
A game.
You have joined a club. It’s not very exclusive. I call it A Tree Falls in the Forest Club. It’s members are those who think that if they don’t personally see the practices then they didn’t happen. Congratulations!
Posted on 9/14/26 at 12:37 pm to KidCreole
quote:
Start him for a series or two.....see how it goes.
You state there was no mention of replacing Leavitt.... well, what does START HIM for a series or two actually mean? Were you one of the ones in the review booth during the Saints game yesterday? What was the "INTENT" of your post? When you say 'start him for a series or two' -- that implies STARTING HIM during the first series, therefore, replacing Leavitt.
Posted on 9/14/26 at 1:28 pm to KidCreole
Would not hate rotating Landen in for a series if Sam struggles to see the field and defense.
CFB has a long history of QB rotation, even the greatest ones.
CFB has a long history of QB rotation, even the greatest ones.
Posted on 9/14/26 at 2:06 pm to KidCreole
So bench the guy on your team that took his team to a College Football Playoff?
Posted on 9/14/26 at 2:50 pm to mfiredog
I too trust Lane; never said I did'nt, or was ever "questioning" his judgement! I'm just thinking, discussing a possibility on an LSU football forum who's purpose is to do precisely that.
And my points are reasonable, valid. Although most don't even know what/why my actual points were. The "don't thing or change" simpletons are unable to mentally consider, think out of the box. But if, or when, my "idea' about perhaps starting Landon Clark to see/find out his true upside, or downside, WHICH WE HAVE NOT REALLY SEEN/TESTED YET (unlike Leavitt)......when this theory/strategy I've suggested is maybe utilized soon/now or in the future......whether out of "necessity", desperation, fear, curiosity, injury, etc.......the simpletons who panic-reacted above @ starting/trying Clark out to find out will have completely forgotten (go into clinical Denial) their comments about how crazy, ridiculous, insane, idiotic the idea was!
I was told by a very wise man long ago to........"Never presume/assume that while or when dealing with individuals or the mass public......to never make the mistake that you are dealing with rational, intelligent people"! That advice is especially helpful here while reading/discussing various topics. Their simplistic, gutteral reactions, comments don't faze me. It's not to them I write/speak. But their lack of being able to follow, understand or even read a topic/thread is concerning, sad & frustrating at times. Their one-track, hard-headed, resistive mindset reminds me of Les Miles. Fortunately, Lane Kiffen does not think that way. He is totally into thinking, incorporating fresh, bold, new ideas. He's not boring, and is thus the #1 most desirable interview, guest & coach!
And my points are reasonable, valid. Although most don't even know what/why my actual points were. The "don't thing or change" simpletons are unable to mentally consider, think out of the box. But if, or when, my "idea' about perhaps starting Landon Clark to see/find out his true upside, or downside, WHICH WE HAVE NOT REALLY SEEN/TESTED YET (unlike Leavitt)......when this theory/strategy I've suggested is maybe utilized soon/now or in the future......whether out of "necessity", desperation, fear, curiosity, injury, etc.......the simpletons who panic-reacted above @ starting/trying Clark out to find out will have completely forgotten (go into clinical Denial) their comments about how crazy, ridiculous, insane, idiotic the idea was!
I was told by a very wise man long ago to........"Never presume/assume that while or when dealing with individuals or the mass public......to never make the mistake that you are dealing with rational, intelligent people"! That advice is especially helpful here while reading/discussing various topics. Their simplistic, gutteral reactions, comments don't faze me. It's not to them I write/speak. But their lack of being able to follow, understand or even read a topic/thread is concerning, sad & frustrating at times. Their one-track, hard-headed, resistive mindset reminds me of Les Miles. Fortunately, Lane Kiffen does not think that way. He is totally into thinking, incorporating fresh, bold, new ideas. He's not boring, and is thus the #1 most desirable interview, guest & coach!
Posted on 9/14/26 at 2:56 pm to Juan Betanzos
This poor fella proves my earlier point. He equates "start for a series or 2" with "replacing/benching". Poor guy is so petrified of the unknown, vs the known, that he confused the meaning of words, and the time + trial periods associated/mentioned in conjunction with them.
Classic "simplistic & reactionary" comment.
Classic "simplistic & reactionary" comment.
Posted on 9/14/26 at 3:10 pm to redstick13
Another classic example, whereby the commenter proves my very point of being to distracted to read or follow anything a 3 line twitter post.
Reading a comment/post that would take the bloke 22 seconds is now the equivalent of reading War & Peace!
What's important is increasing 41K + post totals! It's all about QUANTITY rather than QUALITY - that's all that matters.
Reading a comment/post that would take the bloke 22 seconds is now the equivalent of reading War & Peace!
What's important is increasing 41K + post totals! It's all about QUANTITY rather than QUALITY - that's all that matters.
Posted on 9/14/26 at 3:36 pm to KidCreole
How about we let the coaches, who seem them every day, decide who to start?
Posted on 9/15/26 at 2:55 pm to chryso
For the surprise/shock value alone!!....not to mention the "Forced Momentum Strategic Shift" upon Ole Miss's Home Field Advantage + Jacked Up/Loud Fans.........
Putting Landon In on the first series would carry "Very Little Risk" to "Huge, Immediate Advantages" ~ Risk vs Reward!!
It would be classic Kiffin!
Putting Landon In on the first series would carry "Very Little Risk" to "Huge, Immediate Advantages" ~ Risk vs Reward!!
It would be classic Kiffin!
Posted on 9/15/26 at 3:03 pm to KidCreole
Yeah let’s question one of the best qb talent evaluators, who studied their film before they came here, recruited them, and watches them everyday at practice.
Let’s start a backup guy who outside of garbage time, with huge leads, and no pressure the last 2 weeks, only has ever played against division 2 opponents. Let’s start him on the road in our first SEC game, against a top 10 team in a hostile environment. What could go wrong.
What do we have to lose, you ask? Well the game first and foremost, not to mention Leavitt’s confidence and attitude moving forward, and also the backup qb’s confidence and growth moving forward if he played bad. So basically have a ton to lose.
Let’s start a backup guy who outside of garbage time, with huge leads, and no pressure the last 2 weeks, only has ever played against division 2 opponents. Let’s start him on the road in our first SEC game, against a top 10 team in a hostile environment. What could go wrong.
What do we have to lose, you ask? Well the game first and foremost, not to mention Leavitt’s confidence and attitude moving forward, and also the backup qb’s confidence and growth moving forward if he played bad. So basically have a ton to lose.
Page 4 of 5
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News