Started By
Message

re: Many outlets reporting on diminished US munitions

Posted on 7/26/26 at 5:45 pm to
Posted by Timeoday
Easter Island
Member since Aug 2020
24997 posts
Posted on 7/26/26 at 5:45 pm to


There is no way in hell the military, under Hegseth, is going to let the world know what we have. He runs the DOW now, formerly the DOD.

Completely different mindset to remove those who have harmed America.
Posted by FLBooGoTigs1
Nocatee, FL.
Member since Jan 2008
59504 posts
Posted on 7/26/26 at 5:59 pm to
quote:

ABC provided detailed figures as seen below, but there are variations of this story from NYT, CNN, NBC, etc today.


I don't believe one fricking thing those idiots say or post.
Posted by Dissident Aggressor
Member since Aug 2011
5769 posts
Posted on 7/26/26 at 6:15 pm to
good, maybe we will stop sending munitions to ukraine for the purpose of killing White people…
Posted by Smokingsection
Member since Jul 2026
57 posts
Posted on 7/26/26 at 6:17 pm to
ABSOLUTELY TRUMP WOULD NOT LET THIS HAPPEN
Posted by SlidellCajun
Slidell la
Member since May 2019
16732 posts
Posted on 7/26/26 at 6:37 pm to
Even if true, why report this?
Posted by VOR
New Orleans
Member since Apr 2009
69409 posts
Posted on 7/26/26 at 6:44 pm to
quote:

If the MSM reported that water is wet, I'd have to open a facet to confirm it.



These reports have appeared on the more conservative, agenda outlets, as well as the so-called "MSM"
Posted by Zgeo
Baja Oklahoma
Member since Jul 2021
3984 posts
Posted on 7/26/26 at 6:46 pm to
You had me at “ many outlets”….. :rotflmao:
Posted by damnstrongfan
St. George, Louisiana
Member since Dec 2009
2494 posts
Posted on 7/26/26 at 6:51 pm to
Our munitions factories should be running 24-7, 7 days a week. If they are not, why not?
Posted by Bobby OG Johnson
Member since Apr 2015
33938 posts
Posted on 7/26/26 at 6:55 pm to


I am sure that this news of low ammo is extremely dangerous to our democracy
Posted by VOR
New Orleans
Member since Apr 2009
69409 posts
Posted on 7/26/26 at 6:59 pm to
quote:


quote:
If the MSM reported that water is wet, I'd have to open a facet to confirm it.




They love to lie. Are nothing but trolls now.


These reports have been on Newsmax, Fox and other conservative outlets.
Posted by Riverside
Member since Jul 2022
11313 posts
Posted on 7/26/26 at 7:01 pm to
It’s interesting that you take the reports of unnamed sources as gospel yet you refuse to acknowledge the veracity of any evidence of fraudulent voting in the 2020 election.
Posted by Penrod
Member since Jan 2011
57122 posts
Posted on 7/26/26 at 7:05 pm to
quote:

I don't think that the general public or media has a real picture on what our stockpiles actually are

Plus how fast are we producing these now?
Posted by udtiger
Over your left shoulder
Member since Nov 2006
116665 posts
Posted on 7/26/26 at 7:07 pm to
There is little question that stockpiles has been impacted.

How much?

No one knows for certain.*

If these numbers/info is accurate, the motherfricking source is a damned traitor.
Posted by VOR
New Orleans
Member since Apr 2009
69409 posts
Posted on 7/26/26 at 7:18 pm to
quote:

the veracity of any evidence of fraudulent voting in the 2020 election.


There has been no conclusive evidence that "fraud" changed any results.
Multiple cases have been dismissed because there's not even enough to get past the preliminary motion stage...

Those that have actually been tried have not made it past summary judgment(and yes, S/J has the same worth as a judgment after a jury trial...
Posted by rooster108bm
Member since Nov 2010
3266 posts
Posted on 7/26/26 at 7:19 pm to
quote:

There is little question that stockpiles has been impacted.

How much?

No one knows for certain.*

If these numbers/info is accurate, the motherfricking source is a damned traitor.


I'll say this. We were fighting Afghanistan and Iraq for 20 fricking years and we didn't run low. So that means if we are low on stockpile that's not Trumps fault but Bush and Obamas fault for not replacing what the used.
Posted by Sabans straw hat
Member since May 2022
1133 posts
Posted on 7/26/26 at 7:21 pm to
Where is our money going then?
Posted by OldManRiver
Prairieville, LA
Member since Jan 2005
7703 posts
Posted on 7/26/26 at 7:39 pm to
Here are some excerpts from what appears to be a well sourced article from Foriegn Policy Research Institute.

quote:

The first requirement for command of the reload is time, and the Patriot interceptor missile illustrates this timing problem. Every PAC-3 MSE interceptor carries a production lead time of 24 months for the missile and 30 months for the solid rocket motor. Such timelines are due to physical industrial constraints, such as the lengthy curing time required for solid rocket motors and the complex, multi-year process of qualifying any new component supplier. Interceptors funded under the April 2026 contract will probably not arrive until mid-2028 at the earliest

quote:

Washington has begun moving in this direction. In January 2026, the Pentagon and Lockheed Martin signed a seven-year framework agreement to raise PAC-3 MSE production from 600 missiles annually to 2,000 a year by 2030. This is a serious effort to buy time before the next emergency. Still, the scale of the gap remains striking. Lockheed delivered only 620 interceptors in 2025, or about 1.7 missiles per day for a global network of allies. While the production curve is improving, its industrial slope cannot match modern combat.

quote:

During the first four days of the Iran war, coalition forces expended Patriot rounds at an estimated rate of 225 missiles per day, while Lockheed’s Camden facility produced just 1.7 per day. This consumption-to-production ratio of roughly 132:1 highlights a massive warfighting endurance gap.

The primary bottleneck sits one level below the prime contractor. Boeing produces the active radar seeker for every PAC-3 MSE from a single facility in Huntsville, Alabama, and in 2025 it delivered only around 650 to 700 seekers. Recognizing this choke point, the Pentagon signed a framework in April 2026 to triple seeker production, an admission that final assembly capacity is irrelevant if the sub-tier cannot keep up


Article
Posted by funnystuff
Member since Nov 2012
9232 posts
Posted on 7/26/26 at 8:14 pm to
How does it benefit the US in negotiations to spread disinformation that makes the enemy think we are weaker than we actually are?


What the IC published is almost certainly the upper limit of what we have available. They wouldn’t undercount the true number. Telling a lie about the number being lower than reality would be certifiably retarded.
Posted by BTROleMisser
Murica'
Member since Nov 2017
15660 posts
Posted on 7/26/26 at 9:00 pm to
Anyone who believes this is an absolute fricking retard.
Posted by BTROleMisser
Murica'
Member since Nov 2017
15660 posts
Posted on 7/26/26 at 9:03 pm to
Keyboard TDS nerds think a few months of not even that intense bombing etc, that our munitions are depleted… the same country with the most funded and armed military in the world, by far, the same military that doesn’t blink at 10 and 20+ year wars… they think we’re cashed out after a few months in Iran, with no troops on the ground etc.

JFC you people are so ravaged with TDS and gullible because of it.

Incredible.
This post was edited on 7/26/26 at 9:11 pm
first pageprev pagePage 6 of 8Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookXInstagram