- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
Posted on 7/26/26 at 9:06 pm to BTROleMisser
quote:
Anyone who believes this is an absolute fricking retard.
Anyone who starts a thread about it is a POS retard
Posted on 7/26/26 at 9:08 pm to SlidellCajun
quote:
Even if true, why report this?
Because it smears Trump and muh “reckless, unlawful decision to go into endless war (for da JOOz)” and blah blah blah REEE!!! REEE!!! … mid term elections.
This post was edited on 7/26/26 at 9:13 pm
Posted on 7/26/26 at 9:09 pm to VOR
quote:
These reports have been on Newsmax, Fox and other conservative outlets
You were watching them?
Posted on 7/26/26 at 10:09 pm to funnystuff
quote:
How does it benefit the US in negotiations to spread disinformation that makes the enemy think we are weaker than we actually are?
How does it benefit the US to negotiate with IRAN?
Posted on 7/26/26 at 11:56 pm to Riverside
quote:
Fake news
Here we are! The cult default response to anything considered potentially negative.
Posted on 7/27/26 at 6:50 am to Timeoday
Summary of our conversation…
You: All the MSM does is lie, don’t trust these numbers
Me: The US military produced these numbers, not the MSM
You: The US military doesn’t want the enemy to know our munitions numbers, so they’re not going to publish the truth
Me: If we were going to lie about our munitions numbers, we would overstate them, not understate them
You: We shouldn’t be talking to the enemy anyway
For summary:
In 3 successive posts, you made exactly 3 completely different arguments. As soon as one stupid statement got disproven, you shifted the goalpost to a new stupid statement.
You: All the MSM does is lie, don’t trust these numbers
Me: The US military produced these numbers, not the MSM
You: The US military doesn’t want the enemy to know our munitions numbers, so they’re not going to publish the truth
Me: If we were going to lie about our munitions numbers, we would overstate them, not understate them
You: We shouldn’t be talking to the enemy anyway
For summary:
In 3 successive posts, you made exactly 3 completely different arguments. As soon as one stupid statement got disproven, you shifted the goalpost to a new stupid statement.
Posted on 7/27/26 at 6:52 am to Riverside
You know that these numbers were copied and pasted from legally required open source reporting from the US military, right?
Posted on 7/27/26 at 6:52 am to funnystuff
I think what most people are forgetting is that the only hole reason we built all these bombs in the first place was for it to be used in wars.
Posted on 7/27/26 at 7:41 am to Tiger985
The easiest way to handle discussion of a difficult subject is simply to ignore it, apparently…
Posted on 7/27/26 at 7:50 am to joshnorris14
Honestly I don't have a problem that we have used anywhere from 190 - 290 THAAD rockets My biggest problem is that we only had 360 THAAD rockets to start with.
Seriously SM3 or Patriots only having those numbers "Pre War"? we should have over 5000 minim patriot rockets.
I guess this is what 12 years of democratic leadership does to a military.
Seriously SM3 or Patriots only having those numbers "Pre War"? we should have over 5000 minim patriot rockets.
I guess this is what 12 years of democratic leadership does to a military.
Posted on 7/27/26 at 7:54 am to B747Tiger
No… the whole reason we built all these bombs in the first place was to win these wars.
Posted on 7/27/26 at 7:55 am to BTROleMisser
quote:
Because it smears Trump and muh “reckless, unlawful decision to go into endless war (for da JOOz)” and blah blah blah REEE!!! REEE!!! … mid term elections.
You seem obsessed with Jews
Is it possible that the truth regarding this is somewhere in the middle? We gave away a lot of crap to Ukraine for one.
Posted on 7/27/26 at 7:56 am to funnystuff
quote:
No… the whole reason we built all these bombs in the first place was to win these wars.
Have we won a war since WWII? Maybe Iraq I (Desert Storm) but even then we stopped short. Its almost like we don't try to win but want to just 'negotiate'.
This post was edited on 7/27/26 at 8:10 am
Posted on 7/27/26 at 8:14 am to Friscodog
quote:
we should have over 5000 minim patriot rockets.
I guess this is what 12 years of democratic leadership does to a military.
The problem is it takes 24-30 months to build one.
To get to 5000, at the rate Lockheed builds them, it would have taken 8 years without firing a single one to get to that, and that's assuming best case production rate.
Posted on 7/27/26 at 8:24 am to joshnorris14
How were we supposed to fight China or Russia one day if we are running out of munitions fighting Iran? Doesn't make sense.
Posted on 7/27/26 at 8:50 am to joshnorris14
We had to shorten the initiative of war for lack of planning on using supplies.
Posted on 7/27/26 at 8:52 am to joshnorris14
quote:
Do you think the media has a clue what the status of munitions supply is at any point in time?
I think there is without a doubt the chance that they know this information. I don't think they are blindly making this up. Either someone is providing them highly detailed information that is accurate or they are providing them highly detailed information that is inaccurate.
You can make an educated approximation with the help of some strategic FOIA puzzle piece collecting and analysis. Or just go ask any of the Benedict Generals that love talking about themselves.
Popular
Back to top


0






