- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Many outlets reporting on diminished US munitions
Posted on 7/26/26 at 1:16 pm to RohanGonzales
Posted on 7/26/26 at 1:16 pm to RohanGonzales
quote:
bullshite
One outlet sees the story, then they rush to report it, too. They get their info from the same left wing moles that have been in the military at least since Obama.
You speak with too much confidence.
Could what you are saying be true? Yes.
Is it definitively true? No.
The NYT ran a story about Vance and Caine warning Trump this past week on further escalations in Iran. It's possible that story comes from someone in Vance/Caine's corner, it's possible that someone leaked that to cause division between those parties and Trump. It's possible Trump leaked it to A/B test the reaction to the story (Although I believe Trump would most likely go to Axios).
All these are possibilities that we do not have the requisite information to determine with certainty which is true, or if none are true.
1
Posted on 7/26/26 at 1:17 pm to Powerman
quote:
According to sources the bombing campaign had reached the limit of its effectiveness
Talking to yourself in the mirror is not a " source".
Posted on 7/26/26 at 1:18 pm to SDVTiger
Gateway Pundit lies all the time but you like those lies so you believe it. People post bullshite Tweets from Twitter on here daily that already have a Community Note attached to them but you like those lies as well because you believe them. You are no different.
Posted on 7/26/26 at 1:19 pm to joshnorris14
That’s what I have always thought when these stories hit — there is a Vance/Caine/Gabbard type of faction going to the press with this.
This post was edited on 7/26/26 at 1:22 pm
Posted on 7/26/26 at 1:20 pm to joshnorris14
frick you and this thread commie!
Posted on 7/26/26 at 1:21 pm to joshnorris14
Anyone who reports on matters of national security such as munitions stockpiles should be jailed.
Posted on 7/26/26 at 1:21 pm to ArHog
quote:
frick you and this thread commie!
Take a lap
Posted on 7/26/26 at 1:22 pm to joshnorris14
Anyone that believes the media knows what our military has is a complete moron.
Posted on 7/26/26 at 1:22 pm to ItTakesAThief
quote:
Anyone who reports on matters of national security such as munitions stockpiles should be jailed.
Great.
Now on to the topic - If US munitions are low, what happens with this conflict?
Posted on 7/26/26 at 1:23 pm to joshnorris14
2/3 > 1/3
Posted on 7/26/26 at 1:23 pm to joshnorris14
quote:
Take a lap
You believe this fake news so much
Ya'll got him now
Posted on 7/26/26 at 1:24 pm to joshnorris14
Yeah.... I'm sure the Pentagon readily passes on information about our national security such as, our fricking munitions inventory!!!
Lmao!!! Smh....
Lmao!!! Smh....
Posted on 7/26/26 at 1:25 pm to joshnorris14
what a waste. foolish war
Posted on 7/26/26 at 1:25 pm to joshnorris14
President has powers to force mass production and he should use it.
A responsible Congress would immediately pass funding to pay for it.
Unfortunately money to build weapons and munitions has been siphoned to fraud and unnecessary social programs in the past 20 years.
A responsible Congress would immediately pass funding to pay for it.
Unfortunately money to build weapons and munitions has been siphoned to fraud and unnecessary social programs in the past 20 years.
Posted on 7/26/26 at 1:26 pm to joshnorris14
You can’t possibly be dumb enough to think a few months of targeted strikes could lower US munitions meaningfully. This is a retarded story that poorly educated libs like yourself lap up without any analysis.
Posted on 7/26/26 at 1:27 pm to joshnorris14
I would imagine that this is top secret information... could it be public access?
Posted on 7/26/26 at 1:27 pm to imjustafatkid
quote:
Didn't they already try this version of fake news?
No that was the MOU you denied was legitimate that proved to be 100% accurate
Posted on 7/26/26 at 1:30 pm to joshnorris14
quote:The DOD needs to ID whomever leaked that, and make them very uncomfortable
ABC provided detailed figures as seen below, but there are variations of this story from NYT, CNN, NBC, etc today.
Posted on 7/26/26 at 1:31 pm to Bunk Moreland
quote:
That’s what I have always thought when these stories hit — there is a Vance/Caine/Gabbard type of faction going to the press with this.
JD is a politician who undoubtedly has his own ambitions of being president
If he thinks things might go south he absolutely would leak stuff to friendly press to make him look like the moderate or voice of reason in all of this
That way when he answers the inevitable questions at the debates in a couple of years, he can say “I tried to tell them it was going bad, but President Trump believed strongly we should continue. Wasn’t my idea”
Posted on 7/26/26 at 1:32 pm to Riverside
quote:
You can’t possibly be dumb enough to think a few months of targeted strikes could lower US munitions meaningfully.
It's not the targeted strikes that deplete the munitions. It's the shock and awe in the opening salvo of the conflict
Page 3 of 8
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News