Started By
Message

re: Many outlets reporting on diminished US munitions

Posted on 7/26/26 at 1:33 pm to
Posted by High C
viewing the fall....
Member since Nov 2012
61801 posts
Posted on 7/26/26 at 1:33 pm to
quote:

straight closed


Mental note: in the future ignore

quote:

j1897
Posted by imjustafatkid
Alabama
Member since Dec 2011
67306 posts
Posted on 7/26/26 at 1:39 pm to
quote:

No that was the MOU you denied was legitimate that proved to be 100% accurate


Interesting reimagining of history here. Par for the course for you.
Posted by Powerman
Member since Jan 2004
175393 posts
Posted on 7/26/26 at 1:39 pm to
quote:

You can’t possibly be dumb enough to think a few months of targeted strikes could lower US munitions meaningfully.

Raytheon makes about 100 tomahawk missiles a year. We've used over 1000

I don't know what our current stockpiles were to begin the war but we did burn through years of production in months

Of course that's just that one asset. I haven't looked into other munitions so I'll refrain from commenting further.

We did move intercept systems from South Korea to the middle east so that could tell you something.
Posted by The_Duke
Member since Nov 2016
4653 posts
Posted on 7/26/26 at 1:48 pm to
I still don’t understand how we spend nearly a trillion dollars a year on our military and can’t wipe out a bunch of guys in speedboats with guns from the 80s
Posted by Riverside
Member since Jul 2022
11313 posts
Posted on 7/26/26 at 1:55 pm to
quote:

It's the shock and awe in the opening salvo of the conflict


What percentage of total munitions were used for “shock and awe”? Do you have any data to support your moronic take?
Posted by SmackoverHawg
Member since Oct 2011
31711 posts
Posted on 7/26/26 at 1:59 pm to
We have been ramping up production on all of these since Trump's first term. It went into hyperdrive a few months before Ukraine and then Trump kicked it into warp speed upon his return. We got plenty. We can replace those numbers in 6-8 weeks probably. We're getting rid of the shite with short shelf lives.
Posted by NashvilleTider
Your Mom
Member since Jan 2007
15903 posts
Posted on 7/26/26 at 2:01 pm to
Do you know how many people are employed in our MIC - wars are great for our economy and I am all for them. Forever wars have a bad wrap but I’m thankful for Trump and the competency he has run this - it will be studied for years on how to run a war.
Posted by SmackoverHawg
Member since Oct 2011
31711 posts
Posted on 7/26/26 at 2:01 pm to
quote:


quote:
You can’t possibly be dumb enough to think a few months of targeted strikes could lower US munitions meaningfully.

Raytheon makes about 100 tomahawk missiles a year. We've used over 1000

LMAO. Those are old, outdated numbers.
Posted by SmackoverHawg
Member since Oct 2011
31711 posts
Posted on 7/26/26 at 2:02 pm to
quote:

Raytheon makes about 100 tomahawk missiles a year. We've used over 1000

Now do Lockheed's output too. And with more up to date numbers for both.
Posted by Auburn1968
NYC
Member since Mar 2019
27329 posts
Posted on 7/26/26 at 2:04 pm to
quote:

Not everything is a conspiracy against Trump.


With that gaggle of MSM dem mediots, it is.
Posted by SDVTiger
Cabo San Lucas
Member since Nov 2011
99355 posts
Posted on 7/26/26 at 2:05 pm to
quote:

Why did we stop bombing the other day?


Trump the Merifcul

quote:

Gateway Pundit lies all the time but you like those lies so you believe it. 


Gateway is just as terrible as the rest of the MSM. But we have heard we are running low on ammunitions since the Russia War started

But rondicks laps up his leftwing media
Posted by SmackoverHawg
Member since Oct 2011
31711 posts
Posted on 7/26/26 at 2:06 pm to
quote:

At some point we are being gaslit by the administration, brother. Why did we stop bombing the other day?

I can assure you it's not for lack of munitions.
Posted by TigerMyth36
River Ridge
Member since Nov 2005
41769 posts
Posted on 7/26/26 at 2:08 pm to
Is this like when they reported it two weeks into the attack? Or when they reported we were almost out 1 month in. Or I guess it might be similar to when they reported it the other 5 times. The good thing about having zero accountability or integrity is they can keep saying it and they might be right at some point.
This post was edited on 7/26/26 at 2:23 pm
Posted by Bunk Moreland
Member since Dec 2010
69712 posts
Posted on 7/26/26 at 2:09 pm to
There is a potential fuel shortage angle.

quote:

Miller concludes that the crisis is not due to a collapse in refinery output or a fabricated inventory, but rather a combination of structurally low inventories, high ongoing exports, and fragmented public reporting that obscures the military’s draw on national fuel supplies. The evidence supports the view that Rotterdam acts as a shadow endpoint for US fuel, facilitating onward distribution to US/NATO bases, Israel, and other theaters, but the lack of transparent, reconciled accounting prevents the public from knowing the true allocation. The report calls for a unified, detailed ledger to clarify how much fuel is being diverted from domestic resilience to military and foreign operations.

I am assuming that Energy Secretary Chris Wright and Interior Secretary Burgham know this and briefed Trump on it. Stripping the US civilian sector of diesel and jet fuel surpluses at a time when the global supply is still severely constrained by the closure of the Strait of Hormuz and the Houthi blockade of Saudi oil shipments through the Strait of Hormuz increases the risk of damaging the US domestic economy. Did this fact also convince President Trump that a massive attack on Iran at this time would be ill-advised? Worth considering.

LINK
Posted by Diego Ricardo
Alabama
Member since Dec 2020
13680 posts
Posted on 7/26/26 at 2:12 pm to
quote:

Many outlets reporting on diminished US munitions



I had nothing to substantiate it but I had this feeling that the reason we have been playing this will they, won't they treaty talk is because we were running low on defensive munitions used against drones.
Posted by SOSFAN
Blythewood
Member since Jun 2018
16070 posts
Posted on 7/26/26 at 2:13 pm to
quote:

don't know what our current stockpiles 


Being former military let me explain something to you. No one on this board has the security clearance to know what we had, have used nor what is left. To even make a statement on our inventory is ludicrous and shows a pure lack of knowledge on how security clearance works.
Posted by SmackoverHawg
Member since Oct 2011
31711 posts
Posted on 7/26/26 at 2:13 pm to
Now that could be a possibility.
Posted by Diego Ricardo
Alabama
Member since Dec 2020
13680 posts
Posted on 7/26/26 at 2:16 pm to
quote:

Being former military let me explain something to you. No one on this board has the security clearance to know what we had, have used nor what is left. To even make a statement on our inventory is ludicrous and shows a pure lack of knowledge on how security clearance works.



This is 100% true. That information is a serious national secret not the sometimes ridiculously overly secured information you see with our federal government.

I have some hunches but they'll only be hunches until we start seeing the ramifications of stockpile exhaustion in the field.
This post was edited on 7/26/26 at 2:19 pm
Posted by cusoonkpd
Big Mamou
Member since Apr 2015
1972 posts
Posted on 7/26/26 at 2:18 pm to
We did not stop bombing because of Trump being merciful.

We stopped because Brent Crude hit $100/bbl and the 10 year bond return hit its highest since 2005.
Posted by DCtiger1
Member since Jul 2009
11878 posts
Posted on 7/26/26 at 2:27 pm to
quote:

I still don’t understand how we spend nearly a trillion dollars a year on our military and can’t wipe out a bunch of guys in speedboats with guns from the 80s


We can, but Americans don't have the appetite to do what's required. See Gaza
first pageprev pagePage 4 of 8Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookXInstagram