Favorite team:Stanford 
Location:With populists, expect populism
Biography:
Interests:
Occupation:
Number of Posts:466852
Registered on:1/18/2004
Online Status:Not Online

Recent Posts

Message
quote:

Virtue signaling is more important than trying to make Chicago safer.


A more accurate description is constitutional limits on the executive is more important than virtue signaling
quote:

Is that true?


quote:

Veritas


You tell me...

But yeah it was Bronze Age. I looked it up a few nights ago and it was like 1200 BC

For comparison the Persian invasion was like 500 BC. Alexander was like 330 BC
quote:

Google "Biden Student Loan Forgiveness,


They didn't ignore supreme Court ruling here.
quote:

. It’s a way to get people into home ownership

But they own less for longer with that amortization schedule. Why not rent instead?

That's also assuming the house appreciates super quickly. If it doesn't the borrower is even further behind
quote:

Why do you tards act like someone will be in a loan for 50yrs


In your sell-buy constantly scenario, if you're not getting equity what's the point?

And then, the crucial question, is how you get that equity so quickly to make the early sale +EV?

ETA: my prediction is you'll argue irrational appreciation is efficient.

The problem with that Solomon baby splitting is that it ignores the how and why we got here.

For whatever reason, housing is this sacred cow where we can't question bad decision making and pretend irrational appreciation is efficient.

The 50 year mortgage plan is this on steroids.

quote:

The thread title and body shows zero interest in whether the 9 years was warranted or not.


Her criminality and the sentence are 2 different discussions

We can't get to the latter until the former is agreed upon. We are stuck here.

quote:

Why is the entire thread debating that and not assertion that her data proves sketchy shite happened?

Because there is a near religious devotion to her cause even though it's dumb as shite.

Hence why we are stuck at the guilt part of the discussion. Admitting she is guilty is like saying God doesn't exist for some
Trump's specifically aiming at maintaining boomer and older Gen X support. He literally lays it out with his quotes.
quote:

A respected poster on here this morning shared a fake Epstein suicide letter


Was the letter released by the DOJ or not?

*ETA: confirmed it's on the DOJ site for the dump

LINK
quote:

The fact that you are pretentious enough to think you are educating anyone is truly amazing.


While the demographics involved do make it tough, I'm not a quitter.

You can lead a horse to water but you can't make it drink.
quote:

We already know plenty enough. The precise nature and exact details don't even matter.



There you have CT theory 101.

We know what happened. Proof isn't necessary and we shouldn't even discuss the details or precise nature of what actually happened.

:bow:
quote:

The Aeneid was written to entertain Caesar Augustus and create a way to connect the Romas to their Greek heroes. It was written 1000 years after the Illiad and has zero basis in any real history at all.


And then the Britons did it like 1000 years later with the same narrative nucleus :lol:
quote:

Not only do you not add any value to this board, but you subtract from it. You're insufferable. Your sole intent is to divert legitimate discussions away from what's important and toward the minutiae and toward splitting hairs with definitions.

"Well yes, there are 315,000 votes that are in doubt which could easily, and probably would, change the outcome of the 2020 election, but let's not call it fraud. They were clerical errors. Or inadvertent oversights."

Why don't you just f**k right off, dude. It's like you want someone to believe that your concern is for any potential defendant in the case rather than the fact that a we had a sitting president and two senators who were/are in office due to a flawed election.

So stop being a disingenuous assh**e.


I suggest you also educate yourself on what actually happened
Chadamemnon

Batmanamemnon



*ETA: and the jokes have nothing to do with the historical inaccuracies. It just looks like shite. Waiting for muh Cyclops responses :lol:
quote:

do you think there is meaningful registration/voter fraud in the US at the federal elections level?


What threshold is meaningful ?

And are we including legal things like legal MIV and ballot harvesting as fraud?
The demographics on here shifted HARD in 2016 along with the definition of "conservative". Then it ramped up even worse in. 2019 with Q
quote:

That's because your approach is like we're in a courtroom, with evidentiary rules, etc.,


It's more I understand the patterns of the conspiratorial mind and the shitty rhetoric that's has developed since 2016. They have been given a few talking points they don't fully understand and can't adequately defend, so when they are backed into a corner they jump to other talking points there been told to use.

Keeping them on topic and using facts and logic

That's why if they can't pivot, the next move is to attack the facts as fraudulent.

It's the same thing over and over
quote:

We can argue machines and recounts and ballots until we're blue in the face, and get nowhere. That's by design.


Well that's extremely important to this specific story

Otherwise, you permit people to use dishonesty and conflation to project "evidence" of "fraud" out of anything. CLEARLY that's what many on this message board want to do, which is why they react so much when their bubble is popped and the dishonesty/conflation is pointed out.

Just look at how so many want to leave the context of this story and get very upset when forced to remain within its framing.

quote:

I would bet my house that if you had to prove citizenship while registering, had to vote in person with legit ID (or mail in a notarized ballot with a deadline of election day), the federal government would look different than it does today.

Very possible. However even that doesn't prove fraud.
Brennan can't be prosecuted in SDFL without some version of a conspiracy.

If the conspiracy charges are ready, then why would Brennan be the only one indicted when the indictment will give all his putative co-Defendants all the information they need to prepare a preemptive defense?
quote:

If you bought a condo 4 years ago at say $700k hoping to make money off it in a few years but then the hosing market corrects itself and it's now only worth $600k how is that a bad financial decision when every indication from 4 years ago when you bought it showed it would drastically increase in value?


The bold part is not true. People have known the housing market has been inflated since 2017-2018 at the latest. Then it exploded in Covid even further.

If you bought a house 4 years ago in a clear Covid bubble, then you weren't paying attention and clearly made a bad decision.