Favorite team:LSU 
Location:
Biography:
Interests:
Occupation:Dog Catcher
Number of Posts:164919
Registered on:1/27/2004
Online Status:
 Online

Recent Posts

Message
How does making a product more expensive for the consumer, which you acknowledge happens with tariffs, give leverage to the consumer?
I didn't ignore it. I just chose not to quote it. And I chose to expand upon how it can impact our exports as well.

It's almost like you know this is a shitty idea but go along with it anyway because you prefer to live in a fictional world
quote:

And importers do pay the govt. US Customs collects at points of entry.

And that costs is absorbed by the consumer

And in some cases the consumer is also the manufacturer of something we're attempting to export which makes our exports less competitive to nations that we do business with

quote:


BS. When the meteorologist tells you a tornado touching down is imminent and to seek shelter, they mean you have a very short window to prepare yourself.

In this context the danger is more immediate and anyone who isn't a retard can figure this out based on context

If India does in fact attack Pakistan within the next 36 hours they would have been correct that the threat is imminent.
quote:

None of you seem to know the definition of "imminent". Imminent means it's on its way right now. So we should be hearing of the launch within a few minutes. But of course we won't. You all need to stop using words you don't know the meaning of.

Everything is relative

They're expecting an attack within the next 36 hours

I'd say in the grand scheme of things that's pretty imminent. Rebel is just repeating or paraphrasing what they're saying. No reason to attack him for that.
It seems like most people who support that tariffs acknowledge it's a tax on the American people

It's the first time I've seen these people so excited about such a thing though
Trump might be the biggest psyop in American history. We have people arguing to the death that increased taxes on Americans are the way to prosperity. Under no circumstances would these people have ever previously argued this.
It seems obvious that some battles aren't worth fighting

Picking on developing countries like Indonesia simply because we run a trade deficit with them is absurd

It doesn't mean they're "ripping us off"
quote:

The tariffs are one negotiating tactic and you people are freaking out over something that is currently working

:rotflmao:
quote:

You're basically saying the only way they can survive is for them to maintain a stupidly unfair trade imbalance.


That's the thing...only you and MAGA parrots view it as stupidly unfair
quote:

Says who? What does this even mean? If we get them to the table, negotiate a relatively fair deal and then start working together in reciprocal trade, how in the h e double hockey sticks do you imaging that's WORSE than where we are?

You need help

Having free trade with Indonesia would be a good thing

As we currently run a trade deficit with them applying tariffs to their imports hurts us more than it helps us.
quote:

Why are you people acting like these countries are static and not capable of adjusting? Ever heard of Japan?

We don't have the luxury of time to wait for these countries to catch up
quote:

And there it is! It took you a while to get to the artificially narrow criteria, aka "strawman." Congrats?

It's not a strawman. You said it happened in the past.
quote:

do you honestly think the "poor" nations are the ones we're supremely concerned about?


Not necessarily. But if we import from the poor nations and then add the cost input of a tariff to the equation that makes our exports less competitive than the nations that we're aiming to sell to. It's not a particularly difficult concept.
quote:

It's been done in the past. Besides, we don't need the rest of the world to go into a buying frenzy.

But to have exports we do need buyers

And perhaps you can show me examples of the past where we had trade surpluses or even an even account balance with poor developing nations
quote:

I'm referring to the fact that it's well known there is a laughable trade imbalance and a complete joke that previous administrations didn't address it.

You do realize that a trade imbalance with a poor nation is essentially inevitable right? Why would you expect us to have a trade surplus with someone like Vietnam? Not all trade imbalances are inherently bad.
quote:


Even the dem administration didn't reverse the previous iteration of tariffs because they were so lucrative so, you seem to be wrong on this point.

We weren't slapping random 10% tariffs on the entire world though
quote:

Eh, overstated.

If anything the risks are being massively understated by MAGA because they can't imagine a world in which Trump could be so terribly wrong.
quote:

The alternative is ABSOLUTELY unsustainable, including your ill advised idea

That doesn't mean the solution is to blow up the entire economic world order and pray that it works out

The risks are much greater than you may realize
quote:

You're implying that if the US repatriates business, that we will be relying on exports. That's not the case.

We'll still have to rely on at least some exports

quote:

Regardless, there was a time when US products were sought after by most of the world because we made better quality products. Who's to say that can't happen again?

When you look at countries like Vietnam, Cambodia, Brazil they have annual incomes that average around 7200 a year. Why do you think that these countries will be buying up expensive American goods? They simply can't afford them on any meaningful scale.
quote:

In case you missed the chart, we're getting raped BY EVERYONE. Including allies.


Are you referring to the ill conceived chart from the original tariff roll out? Because everyone knows that chart was nonsense.