Favorite team:LSU 
Location:Make Orwell Fiction Again
Biography:Warmest climes but nurse the cruellest fangs: the tiger of Bengal crouches in spiced groves of ceaseless verdure.
Interests:Cornucopian ends attained.
Occupation:Physician
Number of Posts:136994
Registered on:9/28/2003
Online Status:Not Online

Recent Posts

Message
quote:

Massie starts dropping names on the house floor
Why?
#AttentionWhore
quote:

Massie living rent free in this boards head. It’s pretty amazing.
Massie holding hands with a near-Marxist during the SOTU is pretty amazing.
quote:

Reps. Thomas Massie (R-Ky.) and Ro Khanna (D-Calif.) plan to sit together on the Democratic side of the aisle


quote:

Trump's SOTU Address Could Approach 3 Hours in Length
:lol: Holy cow! I'll set the DVR. :lol:

re: Who pays the tariffs?

Posted by NC_Tigah on 2/24/26 at 4:51 pm to
quote:

The issue for many of us wasn’t whether tariffs can exist. The United States has always used them. The issue was the scope of executive authority used to implement them
That is a very fair point. The counter is we do not have a functional Congress. A nonfunctional government branch creates a power void.

re: Who pays the tariffs?

Posted by NC_Tigah on 2/24/26 at 4:49 pm to
In 1960, the top 1% paid about 13% of all federal income taxes; today, they pay roughly 40-45%.
quote:

Food costs have been steadily climbing pretty consistently
Here's a nominal growth comparison.


re: Update: Situation in Iran thread

Posted by NC_Tigah on 2/24/26 at 2:59 pm to
quote:

I’m not planning on watching.
You have a good safe space?
quote:

No more tariffs?
I lump tariffs and corporate taxes into similar categories. So I guess the question I'd ask is if we can raise the same amount of money via tariffs, and cut domestic corporate taxes, is that problematic?
Just released on CNBC following conversations at a POTUS luncheon. He's going to propose passage via reconciliation if Dems refuse to cooperate.
quote:

EXCLUSIVE: Trump to center SOTU on working families with sweeping economic case
Trump is set to address Congress at 9 pm EST Tuesday

By Emma Colton
February 24, 2026


EXCLUSIVE: President Donald Trump’s State of the Union address will put the economy front and center, pairing working-family guests with a data-driven case on affordability — while also making economic policy announcements, Fox News Digital learned.

Trump is slated to begin his speech at 9 p.m. Eastern Standard Time Tuesday evening from the U.S. Capitol. The State of the Union is equal parts constitutional check-in between the president and Congress, as well as a political showcase that gives the president a national stage to claim wins and set the agenda for the coming year.

The 2026 address will be forward-looking but rooted in what the White House described as measurable progress on cost-of-living pressures, with Trump expected to list off statistics and data on the economy following the sky-high inflation rates of the Biden administration, while showcasing everyday Americans who have benefited from Trump policies, Fox News Digital learned.

"President Trump's State of the Union Address will celebrate 250 glorious years of our nation's independence and excellence, highlighting incredible stories of American heroes throughout the speech," White House press secretary Karoline Leavitt told Fox News Digital ahead of the speech.

LINK
quote:

All? Including those that were unsubstantiated or yet to be investigated?
Now where have I heard that before?

Poor dead Elvis even got implicated in the subsequent release. What's good for the goose ...

re: What am I missing on Gavin?

Posted by NC_Tigah on 2/24/26 at 1:49 pm to
quote:

What am I missing on Gavin?
An answer I got from a lady who was talking him up when he was desperately trying to get into the 2024 race is "He's so dreamy." To which several other ladies present giggled.
quote:

That's your argument.
No. It isn't.
Again, you can ignore the actual arguments laid out here, as you have. That's your prerogative. The exchange speaks for itself.
quote:

Because they import a significant portion of their product?
Asked and answered multiple times. You choose to ignore the answers. That's your prerogative.
quote:

Definitely part of it. But probably more importantly, those workers would have to assume the standard of living of those destinations. *cough*
More to the point, they would also be subject to working conditions in those economies. It doesn't matter a tinkers damn to "free traders" whether child labor, slave labor, or unsafe labor practices generate cheaper goods. The only thing that matters is that the goods are less expensive.

Obviously, if we regulate our labor to eliminate or limit unsafe or inhumane practice, there's a cost. It is a cost we are not compensating.
quote:

they have more dollars, but we have the products we’ve purchased.

Right.
It's sort of the millennial versus boomer equation.
Millennials spent money on experiences which they enjoyed.
Boomers spent money on investments which produce more money.
quote:

we are either in government debt because of Walmart.
Good Lord. :casty:
quote:

That’s because the Wikipedia economists go to Google and are told tariffs are bad for the economy. They have yet to figure out that the huge advantage we have had in technology and innovation is about to be undone by AI or at the least severely level the playing field. Which means if we don’t bring back heavy manufacturing we are going to be in trouble moving forward
Bingo.

I'd add that they also do not realize the extent to which foreign trade barriers contributed to our current economic imbalances.
quote:

why aren’t US workers l, lacking opportunity, not emigrating
In no small part, because other countries do not cater to immigrants as we do.