Favorite team:LSU 
Location:Make Orwell Fiction Again
Biography:Warmest climes but nurse the cruellest fangs: the tiger of Bengal crouches in spiced groves of ceaseless verdure.
Interests:Cornucopian ends attained.
Occupation:Physician
Number of Posts:138130
Registered on:9/28/2003
Online Status:Not Online

Recent Posts

Message
quote:

I could start bringing in photos showing shadows being cast in multiple directions, clearly indicating studio lights from multiple angles.
Do it. Please try to have at it.

You've already misidentified shots, astronauts, etc. The location and deployment of the LEM MESA camera was well documented and consistent mission to mission.

Meanwhile, you think Hollywood fakery would place a photographer in the studio taking pictures from an implausible location just so they would have to concoct a detailed explanation as to how the photo was created. That makes absolutely zero sense.
quote:

So, the Indians faked the Apollo 11 & 12 landing evidence?


They're an ally of ours and I assume ...
You assume ... :casty:
quote:

Neil Armstrong. I guess they had another remote camera there to film him taking the first ever steps on the moon?


:banghead:
That is Buzz Aldrin.
Neil Armstrong is the photographer!

Armstrong was filmed by a prepackaged apparatus attached to the LEM. While standing on the platform at the top of the descent ladder Armstrong pulled a lanyard that released a swinging mount, positioning the camera to face the ladder. Aldrin activated the camera with a switch inside the LEM.

The camera had to be mounted upside down and at an 11-degree angle to fit the space. Technicians at ground stations on Earth flipped the electronic signal before broadcasting it.
quote:

Ok, and?
:rotflmao:

So, the Indians faked the Apollo 11 & 12 landing evidence?
quote:

Pete Hegseth Prayer at Pentagon
Did he pray in German?

Again, Tarantino lifted that prayer from a 1973 Japanese film. The Japanese writer likely lifted it from similar US D-Day prayers in the WWII Pacific Theater.
quote:

Images can be doctored, ya know. There is plenty of evidence out there that NASA doctors images
The first images are FROM AN INDIAN MISSION
quote:

And I don't buy that. There will have been a 2.6 second loop delay for anyone operating the camera from Houston. What you see on the film is too fluid for that, imo.
A NASA controller in Houston manually aimed the camera using predicted launch timing and trajectory. Because radio signals from the Moon take about 1.3 seconds each way, there was a delay, so they had to anticipate the motion rather than react instantly.
quote:

I've shown more evidence in this thread that the moon landing was filmed in a Hollywood studio
Well, by golly, let's correct that.

Here are images from India's Chandrayaan-2 mission. (click here for full size):





From a US Satellite in 2011:


(click here for full size)




quote:

The fact that we literally have people from our government telling us it was all fake
Yeah? Link?
quote:

What are y’all keying off of there
The folks in the background laughing as he cracks a smile for one thing
quote:

Is this the thread where all the Tigerdroppings posters with vacant second homes worth millions of dollars in NYC bitch about more taxes that they’re going to have to pay?
This is a thread where some of us who've dropped obscene taxes on second homes over the years can relate to a similar market there, where owners are now being told their rates are not nearly high enough.

re: WTF just happened to the markets?

Posted by NC_Tigah on 4/17/26 at 12:29 pm to
quote:

fricking app made me go check CNN since I figured something bad happened and surely CNN would've been all over anything to hurt Trump but I didn't see anything there. That confused me even more
:lol:
FYI, CNBC runs a live ticker all day.
quote:

Is he bullshitting here?
Obviously.
quote:

Wasn’t she begging people to move back to NYC from Florida just a few weeks ago?
quote:

NYTimes

5 Things to Know About New York’s Proposed Second Home Tax
Gov. Kathy Hochul wants to tax second homes in New York City that are worth $5 million or more. Here’s how the proposal might work.

By Ronda Kaysen
April 15, 2026


City and state politicians are lining up behind Gov. Kathy Hochul’s plan to tax New York City second homes worth $5 million or more. The proposal, to be included in the state budget, aims to help close a city budget gap and to address growing income inequality by targeting the ultrawealthy who do not live in the city.

Similar ideas have been floated before, most recently in 2019, after Kenneth C. Griffin, a hedge fund billionaire, purchased a $238 million apartment on Central Park South. That effort was derailed by the real estate industry, which lobbied heavily against it.

But the political climate has shifted. Mayor Zohran Mamdani was elected in part by focusing on affordability and calling for relief for New Yorkers struggling to get by in the city.
---

What is the pied-à-terre tax?
The tax on second homes, or pied-à-terre tax, would be a yearly surcharge on any New York City residential property worth $5 million or more that is not the owner’s primary residence.
---

Who opposes it?
There was swift pushback from the powerful Real Estate Board of New York, the lobbyist group for the real estate industry. A banner across the top of its website reads, “Stop the pied-à-terre tax” and urged members to contact state representatives to voice opposition.

Critics argue that a tax would dampen demand from wealthy buyers who could instead decide to take their money to states with lower taxes, like Florida.

LINK


Apparently, this is what they're kicking around:

Property Value => Potential Annual Surcharge => Estimated Annual Tax

$5M - $6M ===> 0.5% ===> $25,000 - $30,000

$10M ===> 1.0% - 2.0% ==> $100,000 - $200,000

$25M+ ==> Up to 4.0% ==> $1,000,000+

LINK
quote:

Their presence has surprised many of the camp’s residents. “My dream is to go to America or the UK. America for me is the paradise,” said Usama, a 21-year-old Libyan-Algerian hanging around the main gate. “You can work, you can make a million if you have a good idea. Why they come here?”

re: Cash for Uranium

Posted by NC_Tigah on 4/17/26 at 9:59 am to
quote:

But when Obama unfroze their assets 10+ years ago
First, you are mixing metaphors. Obama paid Iran pallets of cash and a $1.7Billion total to settle a dispute whereby Iran had paid the US $400M for weapons in 1979, but after the Iranian revolution, the US never provided the weapons.

There were a half-dozen ways around that issue, not the least of which is the owed counterparty no longer existed.

Instead, Obama decided to pay not just "the frozen asset" at $400M, but also an additional $1.3B in interest.

re: Cash for Uranium

Posted by NC_Tigah on 4/17/26 at 9:10 am to
quote:

So now we are giving them money and that's ok?
quote:

elease of $20 billion in frozen Iranian funds in exchange for Iran giving up its stockpiles of enriched uranium.
We are giving them their money for their uranium. Yeah, I'd say that is okay.
quote:

Can anybody explain this to me?
No. They can talk around the irrationality and do it in seemingly academic terms, but they can't legitimately explain it, because there is no legitimate explanation. The closest you'll get is "We think the HepVax lasts for decades. It's 'low risk.' So why not get it early and get it done?"

The problem is "Low Risk" does not equate to no risk.