- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
NC_Tigah
| Favorite team: | LSU  |
| Location: | Ray Bans for Max Polarization |
| Biography: | Warmest climes but nurse the cruellest fangs: the tiger of Bengal crouches in spiced groves of ceaseless verdure. |
| Interests: | Cornucopian ends attained. |
| Occupation: | Physician |
| Number of Posts: | 140850 |
| Registered on: | 9/28/2003 |
| Online Status: | Not Online |
Recent Posts
Message
quote:The courts are deciding.
You never want courts to have to decide the fate of anything!
0
quote::confused:
Play professionally in Europe, you don't get to play in college.
quote:They will appeal for a stay of the injunction (assuming a PI is granted). They will, with virtual certainty, lose that appeal.
The SEC will appeal in that case.
quote:
I have not heard anything about that. In what manner has the SEC violated a court order?
quote:
The judge also signed a show-cause order that requires the SEC and NCAA to explain during Thursday's hearing why the new penalties associated with their pro athlete rules, which plaintiffs' attorneys described as "draconian," do not put them in contempt of court and in violation of the judge's previous ruling in the case.
LINK
quote:Loading Twitter/X Embed...
If tweet fails to load, click here.
quote:No one from LSU is saying that.
The lawyers involved say this is about 5/5 for everyone.
It's 4+1/4+1 for everyone
quote:We are recklessly playing with disastrous consequences by abiding the law?
We are recklessly playing with disastrous consequences
By believing the SEC and Sankey when they say they will abide by the law?
Listening to some of you, one would believe LSU is the party facing Contempt of Court charges next Thursday, rather than Sankey and the SEC. :casty:
quote:With a contempt of court hearing in the offing, not showing up would be an odd choice.
If the SEC wanted to concede or not contest they could do so in multiple ways, i.e. not show up, consent to the relief sought.
re: SEC cant punish retroactively players eligible at the time w TRO banning it, Bama Bediako
Posted by NC_Tigah on 8/31/26 at 6:30 am to ClintonTigerMS
quote:There is no precedent in a one-off case which, by-definition, is isolated to the 2022 entry class. That is the problem the SEC and NCAA face in the injunction battle. Their damage is limited. The players' damage could affect them for years.
the SEC not wanting a precedent of pro players coming back to college.
E.g., Suppose Pyburn returns to LSU, has a kickass season, and gets compensated well for it. Then he gets drafted next year, which would equate to millions more.
re: Explain a “preliminary injunction hearing”
Posted by NC_Tigah on 8/30/26 at 6:44 am to Tigerpride18
quote:They did for Luis (though only against the NCAA. Luis's injunction existed before the SEC jumped in with its new rules),
but they already granted the injunction i thought?
The FB players are working with a TRO which expires Saturday. The injunction, if granted this Thursday, will extend the TRO actions until an actual trial occurs. But a trial date would not occur until the season is over, which would render the whole thing moot. At that point, the plaintiffs (the players) would have no basis to continue the case, and the thing is over.
Lawyers like Tom Mars claim the SEC and others will bring the case to Federal Court, the Federal Court will stay the various state injunctions and/or set a trial date in an extraordinarily expedited manner, and reverse state positions in the matter. As this player action is a one-off, and essentially goes away after 5-for-5 kicks in. The vastly disproportionate harm is to players side, which points to any court, federal or state, acting deferentially in favor of the players.
quote:It's been posted.
SIAP - I did search beforehand
What is a night game at Death Valley like?.
But definitely worth a re-post.
re: Be very careful . . . . . .
Posted by NC_Tigah on 8/29/26 at 2:39 pm to SECmeister
quote:Here you geaux ...
Be very careful . . . . . .
SECmeister
LINK
:dunno:
re: The media dunking on us all week can GTFO
Posted by NC_Tigah on 8/29/26 at 12:59 pm to MasterAbe1
quote:Yep.
The media dunking on us all week can GTFO
Given the SEC's pending contempt hearing, how's that LSU abstention on the punishment rules looking now? :lol:
re: The addition of Wright, Harris and Pyburn will take this team over the top
Posted by NC_Tigah on 8/29/26 at 11:14 am to saturncube21
quote:Pyburn may make a pro roster
Pyburn
quote:The CFP Committee will find its butt in the same Contempt of Court vice that squeezed the SEC.
The END game - CFP committee
This is a problem solely of the NCAA's making. The writing was on the wall as soon as the NCAA changed its rules. If the Conferences, or CFP Committee want to FAFO and jump off the cliff with the NCAA, it is certainly their prerogative.
quote:This got real for Sankey in a hurry. I wonder if the SEC will retract their "new rule" prior to September 3rd, or simply make it applicable for the 2027 season onward. Either way, the LSU abstention looks more prudent by the hour.
he NCAA is required to appear on September 3 and show cause why it should not be held in contempt of Court for the violation of the Court's order by the SEC, which has been deemed a person acting in concert and/or participation with the NCAA.
LINK
re: Is the CFP committee the ultimate nuke on NFL players in college ball?
Posted by NC_Tigah on 8/29/26 at 7:05 am to JoeENorthlando
quote:The NCAA created this mess. But what's done is done. The good news is it is a one-year one-off precept. However, it can still get worse for them. If the NCAA, Conferences, and/or CFP continue to double down on enforcing the NCAA's capricious 5-for-5 screw-up, they might eventually FA&FO.
Is the CFP committee the ultimate nuke on NFL players in college ball?
The courts have consistently found for NCAA players in terms of antitrust. If these organizations do force players to sit out, labor lawyers are going to have a field day. The NCAA et al could be looking at a massive class action suit.
re: Hunt Palmer has LSU going 9-3
Posted by NC_Tigah on 8/28/26 at 6:50 pm to Burreaux09
quote:Given the schedule, I am surprised at how many folks have us losing these two.
With losses to Ole Piss, Auburn
I think we win the first three. As bad as we were last year, we were one or two injured Nuss throws from a win in Oxford. My gut is this team is 2-3 TDs better than last year's squad. I am concerned about A&M coming off of OleMiss.
quote:Another underappreciated undersalaried PhD?
College, Masters & Doctorate
quote::rotflmao: :rotflmao: :rotflmao:
ou are a bunch of stupid mother-frickers
your mentality is how Donald Trump got elected.
What a self-own
quote:Like Whit calling West?
it’s proven in court that Kiffin or someone from LSU did contact some of the players from the class of 2022
quote:Great.
It takes time,cows don’t reproduce like pigs.
Now run the actual numbers.
Popular
22
