re: Help Me Understand Trump's Claim

You can’t be reasoned with because you are a dyed in the wool liberal who was fine with the way the country was run into the ground because they were nice to all the influencers and illegals in the country.

If you can’t see the positive impact of border control, and the ramifications of that from overloading our schools, healthcare system, legal system and entitlement programs, you’re just flat out fricking stupid.

I have no problem with the save America act as I know it. That people show id and citizenship. I do think Covid allowed changes in voting to try and accommodate voters and workers. Intentions seem good but paper ballots mailed and mailed back does inherently allow someone other than the voter the ballot is intended to interfere with or in the process. No one shows up at a polling location to give an id or have corrected nuances that could be cleared up if they had presented to vote with an id. For example, if they had moved within the past year or were being confused with a person of the same name in the same location like a jr or sr. An id allows a voting worker to view date of birth and a picture of a person. Additionally, if a paper ballot mailed is not filled in correctly by the voter, election supervisors make a decision on how to count the ballot and who to count it for. For example if a paper ballot was to have the oval darkened so that a scanner could read it and the voter placed an x in the oval instead. Technically the ballot has not been filled out correctly and if the scanner can’t read it, the election supervisors get to determine the votes outcome. Until proof or evidence comes out to show that the machines are tampered and or they don’t work as intended, it is still the preferred method in my mind following the voter identifying themselves. I do believe that Covid and the mailing of paper ballots created the problems with the 2029 elections as well as all of the late counting of ballots which lead to mistrust of the integrity of the process. I do not believe that election machines that are tested in mock elections before each election and that are never electronically connected to the internet and that simply count voters choices and which have the same number of votes as the location had voters can be said to be corrupted without evidence that they were. In fact one of the companies, I believe Dominion sued and one in court because of the loss revenue in selling there machines because of false allegations. If there is any evidence, a single shred of evidence, let’s see it. If not, the machines are the best method of counting. Not humans who make mistakes and have to interpret a vote.

Good, then if the government is mandating all of this, then the government should provide a funding mechanism inside of the SAVE Act as well as stipulate what kind of voting machines to use and the approval process for those machines .

Where's the money coming from to implement the federally mandated provisions for the purchase of the mandated machines that meet federal guidelines and to implement all the cyber measures mandated?

quote:

---

So, during the 2016 election, Obama was president, and there wasn't massive Fraud

---

Has this been demonstrated?

The democrats cheated on an industrial scale with illegal ballot harvesting in the 2020 election.

It was egregious. Look at some of the numbers in the big cities compared to prior elections.

Deep state. frick off.

Harris lost the popular vote and every single swing state. It was a landslide victory for Trump.

Yep, I remember in the mid to late 90s Clinton sent his campaign strategists to Israel to influence an election in favor of the Labor Party, and that is just one of many instances where we "consult and give advice" .

We used to and probably still do it in Central and South America. I mean we essentially funded the nullification of an election through a coup in Chile in 1971.

LINK here is a link to a story about 2 True the Vote folks went to jail for exposing voting information was stored on chinese servers.