- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Counterpoint to all of the sky screaming about surveillance and flock cameras etc
Posted on 7/7/26 at 10:20 am to sidewalkside
Posted on 7/7/26 at 10:20 am to sidewalkside
quote:Allie Rice's family can imagine.
Counterpoint to all of the sky screaming about surveillance and flock cameras etc
Imagine how many crimes would go unsolved if nobody had security cameras? Imagine how lawless it would be out there.
Posted on 7/7/26 at 10:24 am to UtahCajun
quote:
That is a different claim than you originally made isn't it.
quote:
Our laws don’t provide for a right to privacy when you go out driving in the public. Anyone can take a picture of you or your car.
Nope
Posted on 7/7/26 at 10:24 am to sidewalkside
quote:So you got embarrassed in the other threads and felt the need to start a new one?
sidewalkside
quote:The level of stupidity that you have is breath taking. IMAGINE??? I have literally lived through a world without security cameras for the majority of my life.
Imagine how lawless it would be out there.
Removing my privacy and allowing the gov to spy on me at will doesnt make me safer. It makes me a slave. A prisoner being watched at all times
Posted on 7/7/26 at 10:27 am to UtahCajun
quote:He's not here to make sense. He's here to shill.
So, why not lump even more on is what you are gonna say. The fact that this is true gives you ample reason to just surveil even more? Even though everything you listed here would need a warrant for government to access, you want something even more that they do not need a warrant to access.
Posted on 7/7/26 at 10:40 am to BigAL Golesh
He is pulling what a mayor of a Texas town that voted 3-2 to remove flock did. He got pissed that citizens didn’t like it and try to put a resolution to ban all technology from the town.
Also it’s telling that flock employee that have no problem filming everyone didn’t enjoy a journalist going to their office parking lot and filming them.
Also it’s telling that flock employee that have no problem filming everyone didn’t enjoy a journalist going to their office parking lot and filming them.
Posted on 7/7/26 at 10:45 am to sidewalkside
quote:
Imagine how many crimes would go unsolved if nobody had security cameras? Imagine how lawless it would be out there.
Imagine how many people would be convicted if there wasn't surveillance footage to corroborate their side of the event.
How many copies of George Orwell's 1984 and Animal Farm do you own?
Posted on 7/7/26 at 10:47 am to sidewalkside
quote:
Imagine how many crimes would go unsolved if nobody had security cameras? Imagine how lawless it would be out there.
Root cause is horrible parenting. Flock cameras do not prevent anything and should be illegal under Fourth Amendment.
Posted on 7/7/26 at 10:49 am to sidewalkside
quote:
Imagine how many crimes would go unsolved if nobody had security cameras? Imagine how lawless it would be out there.
Imagine how many people would be convicted if there wasn't surveillance footage to corroborate their side of the event.
A society willing to give up privacy for liberty will soon lose its liberty. Everyone should be contacting their elected reps NOW to stop this nonsense. Tell everyone you know to do the very same thing and tell everyone they know ...............
Posted on 7/7/26 at 10:51 am to sidewalkside
quote:
Imagine how many crimes would go unsolved if nobody had security cameras? Imagine how lawless it would be out there. Imagine how many people would be convicted if there wasn't surveillance footage to corroborate their side of the event.
Imagine how many crimes we can solve if everyone had a chip inserted into their left wrist and tracked everything everyone did! Yay for safety!
Posted on 7/7/26 at 3:48 pm to sidewalkside
quote:
Imagine how many crimes would go unsolved if nobody had security cameras? Imagine how lawless it would be out there.
Something like 2/3 of murders in New Orleans, which has cameras everywhere, don't even result in an arrest. How? With cameras everywhere? Guess they'll just use the cameras to catch the people they really want to catch "breaking the law."
Posted on 7/7/26 at 3:54 pm to sidewalkside
They don’t seem to be leading to many arrests in high crime areas. I have yet to hear of flock cameras identifying those involved in “teen” takeovers.
Posted on 7/7/26 at 4:00 pm to sidewalkside
The police already have tons of security cameras. They refuse to use them to arrest murderers, rapists, and thieves. They do use them to arrest conservative protesters. Why would I trust them with more surveillance resources?
Posted on 7/7/26 at 4:14 pm to Zahrim
quote:
there is a difference between private security systems which require a warrant or permission to access and government surveillance when you have cops or other random government employees following your every move....
You should be far more concerned about the private companies use of gather data about you that you do not know about, or care to know about. Private companies have far more data about you the government because there are restriction on the government data collection and use.
There is very limited restriction on private company data collection and use and that data is used against you hundreds of times a day. Why do you think nearly all social media platforms are free? Because the data they are collecting from you is your payment for the service. They then take you data, process a thousand ways and sell it to other businesses to use against you. How about those apps the tell you where lowest gas prices are? You think they are doing that out of the kind of their heart? Heck no, they are collecting data about you and since you have the phone on as you drive they are collecting data about your driving habits they then provide to insurance companies for a fee.
Carry on being worried about the government though.
Posted on 7/7/26 at 9:39 pm to fwtex
quote:why not both govt and private companies? Also, the govt can destroy your life in ways a private company can't, even if it's "less" data. And the govt can get the private company data without you knowing.
Carry on being worried about the government though.
Having cameras on every corner for the govt to access. And then they can see all the cars with cameras on them, and reach out to the car companies to get the recordings they are making.
Giving our privacy away the way some people are ok with is as anti-American as it gets. Our ancestors would be disappointed
Posted on 7/8/26 at 3:25 am to Big4SALTbro
It happens already. In Britain they have total surveillance like us, but reduced protections for freedom of expression or thought. Because they cannot just kill people, yet, they pretend disappear people by arresting them for thought crime, publicly humiliating them, depriving them of the ability to work forever, and then they make thought criminals permanently impoverished wards of the state. They do legally what we do with unbanking and cancel culture. In Islamic countries and narcostates where no pretense of Democracy is needed, actual police states just disappear you, like the Saudis did that "journalist" who pissed off the Prince. Maybe if you really pissed off the authorities they'll leak audio to your family, before they grind your corpse into kibble and dispose of it in a way that is culturally offensive. That's a police state. What we're experiencing right now is bullying by organizations that anticipate unhinged unmitigated power, all your little law enforcement goon friends have justice boners for the day when they can just yoink someone's wife out of their house cause they didn't like the way she changed lanes, and point to some AI witness to justify it. This flock stuff is scaffolding for, the eventual erection of all of the above. Once this sht is in place, legally protected, and your fourth amendment rights sufficiently eroded, it's only a matter of time before the "wrong" authoritarian prick gets into power and you and your LGBTQIA club or Founding Father's Fan Fiction Larp Society are suddenly understanding why Ruby Ridge was a horseshoe theory shttest for the normal distributed IQ curve.
Posted on 7/9/26 at 9:09 am to Big4SALTbro
quote:
He is pulling what a mayor of a Texas town that voted 3-2 to remove flock did. He got pissed that citizens didn’t like it and try to put a resolution to ban all technology from the town.
Also it’s telling that flock employee that have no problem filming everyone didn’t enjoy a journalist going to their office parking lot and filming them.
Loading Twitter/X Embed...
If tweet fails to load, click here.quote:
This is happening in the Carolinas in Georgia as well
"This camera has been cut down with an American flag on it. Another Flock camera is on the ground a block away."
Posted on 7/9/26 at 10:27 am to sidewalkside
I’ve posted here before that my daughter was being stalked and harassed by an old boyfriend. He has anger management issues among many others. The local police were able to track his movements to make sure he stayed away from her apartment and they let him know they were monitoring him. He changed car tags and moved 750 miles away and it only took the police 3 minutes to find his new location when she called to see if he was still in the area. It gave her some comfort knowing he wasn’t in the area any longer.
Popular
Back to top



0








