Favorite team:LSU 
Location:Sorrento, LA
Biography:
Interests:
Occupation:student
Number of Posts:70348
Registered on:11/5/2010
Online Status:Not Online

Recent Posts

Message
2/9, I don’t care for Sotomayor either. I have no beefs with Kagan.

re: Mark Levin Owns Liberty Score?

Posted by kingbob on 4/30/26 at 12:59 pm to
Now there’s a guy who there’s a guys…
I’ll give him his kudos if he manages to repeal the inventory tax this session and gets Baton Rouge a new bridge.
How do I request Tennessee tickets if I am not a season ticket holder? Should I just wait?
5-1 makes 5 safe republican districts and 1 safe democrat district.

6-0 makes 3 safe republican districts and 3 districts that lean republican, but where a democrat has a chance in the right race.
quote:

Huh? Landry made the current map?


Landry made the current map for 3 reasons:

1. As a way to pay back Cleo Fields for keeping the black church GOTV vans from running on election day allowing Landry to win without a runoff.

2. As a way to punish Garret Graves for supporting a rival candidate for governor.

3. To purposely make the districts as racially gerrymandered as possible so as to support a challenge in the SCOTUS.

Landry may be corrupt as the day is long, but he is a very competent operator of political machinery. Landry built this map to invite challenge. He built this map so that it would lose at SCOTUS in the hopes that he could get a ruling that would end minority majority districts entirely, and he got it. This is a major victory for Jeff, and one he has been setting up for a couple years.
Massie is a Congressman, not a Senator, and he has a pretty solid liberty score compared to the GOPe RINOs.
Member when they had all of those devastating floods and FEMA slow walked any help to the residents? I told y’all that the reason was so that the feds could push people off the land to open it up for mining. Well…whadayaknow!?
It will be really interesting to see what happens with qualifying. New maps means new districts which means who is running against whom could completely change. I wouldn’t be shocked to see someone like Garret Graves jump in or maybe a couple candidates who weren’t doing as well as they thought choose not to requalify.
This is the most prudent available move for Landry. He’ll need to get the legislature to sign off on the delay, then likely call a special session. At this rate, we can have the primaries in August.
Yes, but I have been banned in a few subreddits.
They always lump Muslim and Latino violence in with the right, and they always try to lie about people trying to assassinate right wing leaders.
Except by not removing the Iranian regime, pulling back just gives them time and money to rearm. All you’re doing is setting up to have to do the same thing a couple years from now.
Won’t go to hear em’ play djent solos
I’d rather hear indie, grunge, skatepunk, or emo
There’s only one sure way to get me to go
Start playin’ Warped Tour rock n roll
This is Trump’s only realistic path forward at this point. He lacks the political will and popular support for a ground war. Pulling back now would look like an embarrassing defeat.

Starting this conflict was an unforced error. Trump doesn’t have a clean path to deescalate, and I don’t believe the options available to him will give him the “victory” he needs to spin this conflict as good for the American people.
Tbh, Charles may be a lot of things, but I have never heard any inkling of him being a nonce. The narrative around Charles was that he fell in love with a classmate whom his family wouldn’t approve of him marrying. Both he and Camilla were forced to marry other people, both cheated on their spouses with each other before eventually divorcing and marrying each other.

Charles may be a Muslim apologist, a socialist, a philanderer, and a poor monarch, but never a pedo. You can say a lot of bad things about him, but that dude loves Camilla and always has.

Has he run COVER for pedos in his own family? Yes, :lol:
quote:

Do you want to live in an area of mostly starter homes


I am extremely fortunate that I can afford to live in a neighborhood of starter homes that’s relatively close to my job and reasonably safe. I have no need to live anywhere else.
Because I’m not an old rich f!&k who already got mine and wants to pull the ladder up after me.

I want my friends and people younger than me to be able to afford homes, have kids, and get decent healthcare on an honest full time salary. Every couple I know both have to work (sometimes multiple jobs each) just to afford a place to live and kids, which they rarely see because they work so much.

I’m fortunate enough to have a very modest mortgage, but most people I know are paying much higher rents to live in much crappier accommodations. The high costs of living combined with the stagnant wages and cold job market are absolutely throttling the standards of living for generations y and z.
I want housing to be more affordable. I don’t want “affordable housing”. That’s just a government housing project by another name.
Kimmel was kinda funny…12 years ago…