Favorite team:
Location:Nunya
Biography:
Interests:
Occupation:
Number of Posts:11487
Registered on:12/12/2012
Online Status:Not Online

Recent Posts

Message
quote:

Where did you get your legal training?

FTR, I got mine from YouTube University, and now I love listening to audio recordings of circuit court of appeals cases. I know, I’m a weirdo….
quote:

When did you come back around to this hell hole?


“Just when I thought I was out, they pull me back in!”

:lol: :cheers:
quote:

"Technically" yes it is a "win" for proponents of "self-defense" and "feared for my life". But these claims WILL be scrutinized and robustly challenged by the video and audio evidence. It can also be said that the LEO was sloppy and negligent.

It will be scrutinized in the context of previous eight circuit case law. Like it or not, police are giving wide latitude to make reasonable mistakes on the job. The LEO’s lawyer will not have a tough argument to make if this lady’s estate sues him.
quote:

But the legal argument for believing he was in imminent danger is flimsy if the vehicle was not even moving towards him.

Your statement makes it clear that you are just not familiar with the case low on these deadly force/fourth amendment seizure cases. He will 100% get qualified immunity in this case.
quote:

The first shot through the windshield didn't kill her. She was still driving the car when one of the next two shots through the open window incapacitated her. I don't agree this was murder---the agent feared for his life---but, this video breaks down the shot sequence well.

Does not matter. In America, any remotely close call—officer gets the benefit of the doubt. Not giving an opinion on if that’s right or wrong, but that is what our courts have said.
I will concede my post was not very clear. I find the scenario of getting “hemmed up” by LEO (hence my reference to obstruction) for just peacefully observing plausible. Deadly force? I admit that’s a bridge too far :lol:
quote:

“I don’t understand plausibility.” -Ommg

I’d share a hundred YouTube links of this super “implausible” scenario with you if I cared enough.
quote:

Look at this jackass. You think law enforcement officers hate 'accountability' more than criminals do?

When did I make any comparative statements regarding accountability, LEOs, and criminals? English not your first language?

quote:

I can't even imagine being this stupid.


I can’t imagine not being able to read.
quote:

Yeah I’m sure said person was simply “observing”. FAFO

I find it very plausible. The amount of videos on youtube of someone being charged with "obstruction" for peacefully recording the police is too many to count. No one hates accountability more than law enforcement officers.
quote:

But turning "people scamming federal dollars" into "The Deep State" is quite the leap without much solid framing.

I mean…par the course for a Karla thread to be low IQ. Not sure why you’re surprised.
quote:

They have fraudulent autism centers.

Ok.

You are being ambiguous. Does "fraudulent" refer to the autism or to the centers?

quote:

There is fraud going on with regards to autism, the related care and/or the diagnosis of it.



Anyone can conjure any "theory." Thats why I asked do you have evidence or are you just making shite up. It's clearly the latter. You could have just said so and saved us all time.
quote:

They are then getting doctors to provide a bunch of fake diagnoses to generate enrollees in their autism centers

Do you have any evidence for this, or are you just making shite up?
quote:

Yeah because doctors love to lose money on medicaid patients vs making money or atleast breaking even with private insurance. If doctors were trying to game the system wouldn’t it make more sense for them to be over diagnosing private insurance patients?

Shhhhh don't ruin their narrative and take away their fun!
quote:

Doctors are majorly at fault with this stuff too. It gives them a consistent patient thru Medicaid.

Yup. Bc if there is one thing I know well, no one reimburses like Medicaid :crazy:
quote:

3. The increased cases are completely fake to milk the government out of money

Just to be clear...who is faking the diagnosis? And are they the same people getting money from the government for these fake diagnoses?
quote:

You do realize a private citizen walking around vacant buildings filming YouTube content is existing by a completely different set of rules than the FBI right? The FBI would need to first walk into court and show probable cause and obtain a warrant to even enter the building. If they did it just like a random content creator, every scrap of evidence obtained would be tossed… So why don’t you STFU with the ridiculous bitching.

FBI agents can’t do knock and talks and ask questions like private citizens? Oh boy…..
quote:

Holding them accountable for their first crime would help.

Obviously. But by definition, isn’t that already “after” they struck?
quote:

Fundamentally these men need to be permanently removed from society before they strike.

Like in Minority Report?
quote:

I’ll take a man or woman at his or her word until it’s proven that they are a liar.


quote:

But, to immediately dismiss an alternate point of view because it doesn’t align with your own is incredibly narrow minded.


You probably don’t understand the irony in these two statements, do you?

You understand it’s not hard to find evidence of lawsuits. Especially if someone like Fauci “lost” a suit to someone like RFK. The paper trail would be immense. One shouldn’t have to “take someone at their word.” But judging by your posting style, you see something on Twitter that confirms your narrow world view, and without a second of confirmation you run and start a thread on here. It’s embarrassing.

Hey, but keep doing you. But don’t get butthurt when those of us with more than two functioning brain cells call you out for being a simpleton :lol:
quote:

I listened to the video from our Secretary of Health. It came straight out of HIS MOUTH. So, GTFOH with your sourcing.


So your source is someone who is bias? Someone who is making a claim? This is why you are low IQ….you don’t even realize how ridiculous that is :lol:

I’m going to start a thread that says:

“OMMG sued Placekicker for multiple stupid threads.

After more than a year of delays and stonewalling, Placekicker’s own legal team quietly admitted OMMG was right.”

I will not have any link to the lawsuit. I will not have any third party sourcing. My source will be….I said it. Therefore it must be true?

That’s literally what you are doing now. Your source for what RFK is claiming to be true is….RFK said it :lol:

You really are not very bright.