- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: What do you people have against solar farms?
Posted on 8/21/24 at 3:42 pm to LSURussian
Posted on 8/21/24 at 3:42 pm to LSURussian
quote:
Solar farms suck up all the solar energy in the area which causes wide spread crop failures and below freezing temperatures near the solar farms year round.
Texas A&M published a scientific study on the science of this phenomena several years ago...
I'd love to see the journal citation.
Posted on 8/21/24 at 3:43 pm to LSURussian
I'm going to need a link. The only thing I'mfinding is A&M trying to combine farming and solar - Agrivoltaics. LINK
Posted on 8/21/24 at 3:43 pm to Kingpenm3
More cost effective to drill.
Posted on 8/21/24 at 3:44 pm to SWLA92
quote:
They are trying to take away good farmland in other parts of the state. There’s plenty of idle land in BFE they can use. It makes no sense.
Farmland is usually flat and clear. The cost to develop it is lower than hilly pine trees. There's also a limit on the slope angle the panel can be installed on.
Posted on 8/21/24 at 3:46 pm to Kingpenm3
Do it with ZERO subsidies and zero incentives … then I won’t give a shite.
Posted on 8/21/24 at 3:50 pm to Kingpenm3
The most pushback I have seen where I live are due to the tax abatements these solar and wind farms receive. Land/homeowners get quite upset when they get a 10 year tax abatement while they still have to pay their taxes. Additionally, citizens get pissed off because these renewable energy sources receive federal tax subsidies/credits. Those subsidies are paid by those who actually pay taxes.
Another problem with renewable energy is that due to the subsidies, thermal generation (gas or coal) can't compete so very few new plants are being built. The result is not sufficient capacity to cover peak demand. For instance, at the height of the renewable subsidies under Obama, a windfarm could remain profitable at -$1 mWh prices because the subsidies were worth $20+ mWh. Wind and sun aren't reliable energy sources during peak times.
Another problem with renewable energy is that due to the subsidies, thermal generation (gas or coal) can't compete so very few new plants are being built. The result is not sufficient capacity to cover peak demand. For instance, at the height of the renewable subsidies under Obama, a windfarm could remain profitable at -$1 mWh prices because the subsidies were worth $20+ mWh. Wind and sun aren't reliable energy sources during peak times.
Posted on 8/21/24 at 3:51 pm to Mumbler
quote:
Do it with ZERO subsidies and zero incentives … then I won’t give a shite.
Bingo. They're ugly, expensive boondoggles that are inconsistent creators of energy and easily damaged.
The answer to clean energy is easy...it's nuclear, but that solves the problem too well. And we can't have that because the rest of the social bullshite and grifting that comes with this "climate action" needs a vessel.
Posted on 8/21/24 at 3:52 pm to LSURussian
quote:
Solar farms suck up all the solar energy in the area which causes wide spread crop failures and below freezing temperatures near the solar farms year round.
This is very wrong
Posted on 8/21/24 at 3:52 pm to BottomlandBrew
quote:
I'm going to need a link.

Posted on 8/21/24 at 3:53 pm to redstick13
I drove from BR to Jacksonville last weekend and there were tons of solar farms near Tallahassee that were under water due to that storm that passed through.
I wonder how that worked out for them
I wonder how that worked out for them
Posted on 8/21/24 at 3:53 pm to Kingpenm3
quote:Sun don’t shine at night, hoss.
What do you people have against solar farms?
Posted on 8/21/24 at 3:53 pm to bayoudude
quote:
They are hideous
I'm not saying they're gorgeous by any stretch but the claim that they're hideous is just silly.
Posted on 8/21/24 at 3:56 pm to Corriente Kid
quote:
Another problem with renewable energy is that due to the subsidies, thermal generation (gas or coal) can't compete so very few new plants are being built.
Greta rejoices.
Meanwhile...
quote:
China accounted for 95% of the world’s new coal power construction activity in 2023, according to the latest annual report from Global Energy Monitor (GEM).
quote:
China’s 70.2GW of new construction getting underway in 2023 represents 19-times more than the rest of the world’s 3.7GW. As the figure below highlights, the country’s trajectory (red line) is diverging significantly from the rest of the world (orange line).
The level of new construction starting in China is nearly quadruple what it was in 2019, when the country hit a nine-year annual low of entirely new coal power stations starting.
But China gets a free pass, and it has to be by design at this point.
This post was edited on 8/21/24 at 3:57 pm
Posted on 8/21/24 at 3:57 pm to Loup
quote:
How come they ain't pushing to cover parking lots with these instead of farmland?
Excellent point. Population centers with demand vs rural. Shaded parking sold at a premium with charging ability in every slot. Win win.
Posted on 8/21/24 at 4:01 pm to Kingpenm3
They are being put in a finite resource which is arable land. Some very productive delta farm dirt has been put into solar. Put them in parking lots, on warehouses, high-rises etc. Don't go clear cut CO2 reducing woods to stick it in inefficient solar. That and quit subsidizing the shite out of it with my tax dollars.
Posted on 8/21/24 at 4:12 pm to SWLA92
quote:
From what I understand this might be different from other companies, but the company locally after 30 years picks up and leaves the solar panels out there for the landowner to dispose of. Like I said other companies might be different.
A decomissioning bond is in place for life of the project and utilized at end to remove everything at no cost to landowner.
these deals are ground leases, walmart could say they want to build a store and it is the same type of contract / lease
I bet a lot of people don't like others telling them what to do with their personal land/property but have no problem telling these land owners what to do with theirs
Posted on 8/21/24 at 4:12 pm to Cosmo
quote:Think they look hideous, and it bothers me that places like the LSU Ag Center in Franklinton are now covered with the damn things. BUT, I'd take a field full of those over a subdivision or apartments or whatever. Dual benefit of tying up the land long term and keeping more people from living nearby.
I wouldnt want one next to my land
Somewhat related: I really, really enjoy taking an unobserved piss off my home's back porch.
Posted on 8/21/24 at 4:14 pm to Kingpenm3
I would rather eat food from fertile soil and support the farms, than line greedy dims pockets
Posted on 8/21/24 at 4:19 pm to Kingpenm3
Waste of taxpayer funds, harms natural rangeland/ecosystems, and sometimes removes acreage from farmland production.
Popular
Back to top



0








