Started By
Message

re: Inability to afford homes and essentials pushed birth rates to record lows

Posted on 8/15/26 at 2:47 pm to
Posted by UtahCajun
Member since Jul 2021
7189 posts
Posted on 8/15/26 at 2:47 pm to
quote:

With basically no job prospects and people unable to afford housing. People moved to high density living situations and permanently put off having families.

Almost 1 in 3 women did not give birth through age 34 due to poor economic factors.

EDIT to help people

Obviously I am referring the era right after the great depression. Clearly the US has been in this situation prior to modern times where birth rates were in free fall

Would love to see the scientific method applied to this or was a presupposed postion used and the data shoehorned to fit
Posted by wm72
Brooklyn
Member since Mar 2010
9705 posts
Posted on 8/15/26 at 3:16 pm to
I see.

I wonder if women between, say 25- 45 have remained closer to constant over the past century + while babies born to teenagers and girls 20-24 has continually fallen ?

When I see people mentioning third world countries still having high birth rates. I immediately think of the sky high teenage birth rates in those areas.
This post was edited on 8/15/26 at 5:05 pm
Posted by UptownJoeBrown
Baton Rouge
Member since Jul 2024
11713 posts
Posted on 8/15/26 at 3:21 pm to
quote:

I guess developers must feel there isn't enough money in it or they aren't able to build such homes due to zoning/covenant restrictions.


Or people today are dumbasses and will go into huge debt to have it now. So that’s what they build.

Same with cars.

Today’s culture of have the best now is their own worst enemy.
Posted by nealnan8
Atlanta
Member since Oct 2016
5110 posts
Posted on 8/15/26 at 3:28 pm to
quote:

True but the powers that be whom started the WEF and European Union were around since WW2 pulling strings.

Apparently, Q was around as well.
Posted by UltimaParadox
North Carolina
Member since Nov 2008
52853 posts
Posted on 8/15/26 at 3:51 pm to
quote:

Why are we talking about pre WWII fertility rates today?


Majority of posters don't read anything but the title.

So it's pretty interesting to see all the replies that have no context to the data being presented.

That being outside of the baby boomer generation outlier. Birth rates have been declining since 1880.
Posted by UltimaParadox
North Carolina
Member since Nov 2008
52853 posts
Posted on 8/15/26 at 3:52 pm to
quote:

When I see people mentioning third world countries still having high birth rates yiu immediately think of the sky high teenage birth rates in those areas.


Yeah I think that's a lot of it.
Posted by kciDAtaE
Member since Apr 2017
17784 posts
Posted on 8/15/26 at 3:54 pm to
I’d like to see the data of children that lived past 5 years old since 1880. I would imagine they had more kids 150 years ago because they kept dying.
Posted by Pettifogger
I don't really care, Margaret
Member since Feb 2012
87727 posts
Posted on 8/15/26 at 3:57 pm to
Yeah the question is whether more people in world history are declining to have kids at all

(Yes)
Posted by cadillacattack
the ATL
Member since May 2020
11276 posts
Posted on 8/15/26 at 3:58 pm to
Abortions
Posted by armytiger96
Member since Sep 2007
2948 posts
Posted on 8/15/26 at 4:09 pm to
quote:

How many people should live in Tennessee? 70 million? 1 billion?


Population should grow 1% a year. So P(x)=P(1.01)^x

x= years from now
P= today's population

You're welcome to do the math and figure out the answer yourself.

The obvious answer is 350!
Posted by AUstar
Member since Dec 2012
19784 posts
Posted on 8/15/26 at 5:07 pm to
It's variable and goes in cycles. Yet our politicians overreact and think we need massive immigration (Europe and Canada are the same).
first pageprev pagePage 5 of 5Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookXInstagram