- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
armytiger96
| Favorite team: | Army |
| Location: | |
| Biography: | |
| Interests: | |
| Occupation: | |
| Number of Posts: | 2823 |
| Registered on: | 9/17/2007 |
| Online Status: | Online |
Recent Posts
Message
re: 40% of all living veterans are on disability benefits
Posted by armytiger96 on 7/14/26 at 1:25 am to David_DJS
quote:
Could MHS Genesis account for the rate of veterans receiving disability benefits going up 5x?
Not nearly as much as word of mouth within the Veteran community. Most prior to 2012 probably never realized that 25 years after service they would qualify for disability for the ringing in their ears, bum knees, bad back, etc. Injuries during service + father time taking its toll on body equals an increase claims. Word of mouth increases it exponentially.
re: 40% of all living veterans are on disability benefits
Posted by armytiger96 on 7/14/26 at 1:13 am to Ingeniero
quote:
but I still reserve the right to question the process. Same with veterans disabilities
Absolutely, as a taxpayer you have the right and should question the process especially if you don't agree with it.
But don't question the veterans that have filed claims to and are receiving benefits that they earned because the process doesn't match what you think it should be.
There's the difference these threads are never really about questioning the process but instead calling a bunch of veterans scam artists, fraud, etc.
re: 40% of all living veterans are on disability benefits
Posted by armytiger96 on 7/14/26 at 1:06 am to Sam Quint
quote:
Again, no one has a problem with legitimate claims.
The problem is ignorance of the system. What most of the people on this board don't understand is that most of what they consider fraud are legitimate claims.
They have an image of what disability looks like and when they see or hear about someone's rating and it doesn't match that image their thoughts go immediately to fraud.
This is most evident by the 10,000 or so posts complaining about someone having a high rating even though they can work a job that makes big bucks.
Joe public is completely unaware that VA disability payments have absolutely nothing to do with can you work. This isn't the same as your employers disability insurance. It's more like your employers workers compensation program.
They also hear 100% and think it should be someone that is completely disabled. They have no idea how VA math works and don't realize that you can have 100% rating via multiple smaller ratings that accumulate to 100%
re: 40% of all living veterans are on disability benefits
Posted by armytiger96 on 7/14/26 at 12:36 am to Warfox
quote:
especially if they continue to work)
You do realize that this is not a criteria for receiving VA disability?
You can have a high rating and still be a high earner. The two have nothing to do with each other.
You may have the opinion that its not right and as a taxpayer you are entitled to your opinion but don't fault the veteran for taking advantage of a benefit they earned.
re: 40% of all living veterans are on disability benefits
Posted by armytiger96 on 7/14/26 at 12:24 am to Crimson Wraith
quote:
Feds don't tax VA disability pay, do they?
No because its considered Workers Compensation payments which are not taxable.
re: 40% of all living veterans are on disability benefits
Posted by armytiger96 on 7/14/26 at 12:18 am to LemmyLives
quote:
Why the explosion after 2013, when we'd already been at war for 12 years?
Because it wasn't known. It took time to get the word out to include several letters from your Congressman encouraging you to talk to a VA Dr to see if you qualify.
re: Why do old people go to the default argument of $6 coffee when talking about affordability
Posted by armytiger96 on 7/13/26 at 10:01 pm to LemmyLives
quote:
There is no lockbox. There is no lockbox. Ponzi schemes are illegal unless the government runs them.
No one said there was a lockbox. Just a promise to pay.
It's no different than any other debt the gov't promises to pay.
Why are you ok with the gov't defaulting on its debts?
I would love for my kids to not have to pay into it as well. However, I am not ok with being robbed of over $500K when time for me to collect.
re: Why do old people go to the default argument of $6 coffee when talking about affordability
Posted by armytiger96 on 7/13/26 at 9:57 pm to Midtiger farm
quote:
Sorry but your money was already spent It’s my money that you are receiving now and I will do anything in my power to stop giving it to you Not my problem you were dumb enough to vote for crooks that didn’t deliver on your promises
I'm not collecting anything, like you, I'm just paying into the system. I won't collect for several years. Unlike you, I'm not a cuck who is ok with Gov't stealing from me or others.
You can take your trolling efforts elsewhere!
re: Why do old people go to the default argument of $6 coffee when talking about affordability
Posted by armytiger96 on 7/13/26 at 8:23 pm to Midtiger farm
quote:
the money that’s also not yours anymore
This is complete load of horseshite. We are all forced to pay a premium with a promise of a certain payout when the day comes to collect it. It is a defined program any changes to the rules that negatively affects them is wrong and we should all be complaining because if they set the precedent now Lord only knows what they will do to your generation.
Would you be ok if on your tax return the government said, " we know you overpaid on your tax bill this past year but we spent more than we intended so we're not paying out your return?" Once they take it out of your paycheck it's not really your money anymore! Right?
quote:
You also expect millennials and Gen Z to pay more taxes so you can collect that money
First off, you do realize that this isn't a new problem. GenX has been forced to pay into this shite program for 30+ years with the expectation that they likely won't get their money back because that's what we have been told since the 80's.
We were promised reform in 2004 only to watch our trusted representatives do absolutely nothing to address the problem.
Gen Z has paid in 10's of thousands while GenX has paid in hundreds of thousands, and millennials are somewhere in between.
I don't expect anyone to pay more taxes and I am all for reforming the system. However, they have to figure out a way to accomplish it without negatively affecting the recipients. I expect the Government to figure out how to pay its debts with the money it currently collects from the General funds without raising taxes. To me the citizens should not allow their government to default on it's debts to it's citizens. The fact that the younger generations are ok with this is frightening.
What's next flood insurance, bonds, mortgages?
quote:
And you are straight up lying that boomers don’t complain on here about losing their ss and their have also been plenty of threads with them cheering on elimination of their property taxes
This is a thread about affordability not SS. Post a single thread started by a Boomer complaining about affordability and linking it to SS. That is a completely different argument than I paid $300-$500K and they are threatening to not pay what I was promised.
As I said previously the vast majority of the SS "complaints" on this board by Boomers are in reaction to asinine comments like yours stating the Gov't shouldn't pay them what they were owed. These complaints have nothing to do with affordability.
re: Why do old people go to the default argument of $6 coffee when talking about affordability
Posted by armytiger96 on 7/13/26 at 6:09 pm to Midtiger farm
quote:
Then why are they complaining about ss reform, Medicare reform and actively pushing politicians all over the country to get rid of property taxes for people over 65?
You're comparing apples to bricks here.
The younger generations bring their woe is me I can't afford anything arguments to this board routinely along with the Boomers suck because they won't retire, they have all the wealth, and I'm paying their SS welfare to this board almost daily.
They are responding to the idiotic ideas brought on this board by the younger generation daily saying they should just forfeit the $300-$500K that they have given the gov't over the past 40+ years.
They are not starting threads saying woe is me I can't afford shite on the monthly check I get from SS. Although there are several Boomers out there and probably on this board that feel this pain they're just not complaining about it or starting daily threads on subject.
Advocacy groups such as AARP are doing their job and pushing for Sr Benefits is completely different than Boomers coming to this board stating they shouldn't have to pay property taxes.
re: Why do old people go to the default argument of $6 coffee when talking about affordability
Posted by armytiger96 on 7/13/26 at 4:17 pm to boogiewoogie1978
quote:
They always blame avocado toast and coffee for why younger people can’t afford things, but older generations spent plenty too.
Because they are not the ones who are complaining about affordability. The younger generations are complaining so they are the ones being told cut out these spending habits by those that figured out how to control spending and generate wealth.
Instead of listening to and adhering to their advice on how they created wealth you want come here and say see you had wasteful spending too! Sounds like a great way to prove there is an affordability problem.
re: 40% of all living veterans are on disability benefits
Posted by armytiger96 on 7/13/26 at 2:39 pm to GeneralLeeAwesome
quote:
Well in the most recent conflicts FDC wasn’t adjacent to the gun line.
Just curious if this is in all cases or just the way it was set up for the recent conflicts at your particular base camp. I'm not asking with regards to disability just curious how the job has evolved.
I assume for training the FDC rolls with the guns or has technology allowed them to become "REMFs"?
Sorry to hear that you had to fight for your tinnitus claim. I'm not sure why you had to fight it because there is a list that where 13F and the other MOS's that you listed are considered presumptive for tinnitus and hearing loss. Then again its the VA so why ask why.
VA Hearing Loss MOS
re: 40% of all living veterans are on disability benefits
Posted by armytiger96 on 7/13/26 at 12:49 pm to GeneralLeeAwesome
quote:
Artillery Crews (not) FDC,
Just curious why not FDC? You're located adjacent to gun line and it's impossible to do your job while wearing earplugs.
And by the way tinnitus is automatic for Artillery MOS's.
re: 40% of all living veterans are on disability benefits
Posted by armytiger96 on 7/13/26 at 12:42 pm to theballguy
quote:
If you didn't serve, you shouldn't be commenting in this thread.
They are taxpayers; they have every right to complain in this thread. No different than every service member that was injured on job has the right to collect the benefits they earned.
Their anger should be redirected to those that set up the system not the that the veterans themselves. In my opinion the title of the benefit is the biggest problem. Using the term disability is clearly misguiding the expectations of the average taxpayer.
re: 40% of all living veterans are on disability benefits
Posted by armytiger96 on 7/13/26 at 11:52 am to stout
Here's the problem. It's called VA Disability but in actuality it is essentially a workers compensation program for loss of function or quality of life as result of an injury while in service.
Military News
quote:
VA disability operates fundamentally as a federal workers' compensation system for injuries or illnesses incurred or aggravated during military service. It provides tax-free monthly compensation, which—like workers' comp—is designed to offset lost earning capacity, pain, and suffering rather than replace lost wages.
Military News
re: Norman, OK Recs?
Posted by armytiger96 on 7/12/26 at 10:54 am to EMILIO
I am probably a little late with the recommendation but if on your way home you find yourself heading towards Lawton Fort Sill area you may want to try MEER's steakhouse which is north of Fort Sill in the Wichita Mountains.
It's off the beaten path and is no longer a steakhouse. I think burgers are the only thing on the menu. It's adjacent to a wildlife refuge that has bison, elk, longhorns, and prairie dog colonies.
Basically go for a great Sunday afternoon the experience.
It's off the beaten path and is no longer a steakhouse. I think burgers are the only thing on the menu. It's adjacent to a wildlife refuge that has bison, elk, longhorns, and prairie dog colonies.
Basically go for a great Sunday afternoon the experience.
re: Social Security Summary
Posted by armytiger96 on 7/12/26 at 8:41 am to jasonbr1975
quote:
I’d rather they allow the individual to control their own money. They can still call it a tax and require it go into a retirement account, but give the individual the choice to where it goes. I’d rather have my financial advisor manage it with my personal IRA, etc.
I think we all want this option as well. Unfortunately, GW was crucified when he pitched this exact idea to congress in 2005.
re: Social Security Summary
Posted by armytiger96 on 7/12/26 at 8:25 am to TorchtheFlyingTiger
quote:
Problem is, it's just another tax and they don't actually owe us anything unfortunately.
This is a mindset that needs to change. It is a defined program with all sorts of rules for qualifications. They do owe you based on how you contribute which is why they send you an annual statement of what they plan to pay you at full retirement based on your contributions. There is a defined formula that dictates your payments.
quote:
. Yet another case where the irresponsible and unfortunate benefit at the expense of the responsible ones.
As of right now this not the case. It is not means tested your payments are based on what you pay into the system. For example I make way more money than my wife. When I compare her statement against mine my projected payout is significantly higher than hers.
quote:
No one seems to complain that it always has paid out at a higher proportion of contributions to lower earners due to bend points.
Because it's not completely true. Higher earners also get paid out at the higher percentages of their income up to the maximum of the lower bend points. It's essentially the inverse of how our income taxes are calculated.
re: Social Security Summary
Posted by armytiger96 on 7/11/26 at 6:06 pm to SparkyWilson
quote:
I bet it will be one or some or all of raising the maximum income threshold, increasing the minimum retirement age, or means testing, if they do anything at all. More likely they let it burn out with everyone paying in until it does.
This will be the most likely outcome and the means testing will piss me off the most because it will reward the slapdicks in my generation that had fun chasing the Jones's for the past 30+ and punish those of us that were disciplined and planned for retirement.
quote:
It could go belly up tomorrow and they wouldn’t owe you or I a thing.
They would still "owe" us because it is a debt; however we wouldn't have a means to recover that debt. This would be the equivalent of not paying out your tax returns if you over paid. Sorry we over spent this year so we're not going to acknowledge your return.
re: Social Security Summary
Posted by armytiger96 on 7/11/26 at 3:03 pm to DownshiftAndFloorIt
quote:
So just leave it like it is? Don't try to do anything about it? You got screwed, so frick everybody else while you get back pennies of the dollars you put in?
Sure; go run for Congress and do something about it! You'll get my vote! Good luck getting the other 530sh members to follow your lead.
You should redirect your anger and energy at the Politicians who caused and refuse to fix the problem. Not the American citizens that were forced into the system just like you and expect their government to repay its debts! Lord knows the same government expects us to pay our debts.
re: Social Security Summary
Posted by armytiger96 on 7/11/26 at 2:37 pm to DownshiftAndFloorIt
quote:
Somebody is going to get mega fricked. It needs to happen now, or it will continue getting worse. There needs to be a path to doing away with it right now. The problem is everyone getting all pissy about losing their money, and not caring how bad it gets as long as they get theirs. Meanwhile uncle Sam is fricking my eyes out.
It must be 2004 again. You do realize this is the exact argument that was used in 2004 when they tried to privatize SS and has been said by every young worker since the '80s.
Popular
2












