- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Inability to afford homes and essentials pushed birth rates to record lows
Posted on 8/15/26 at 10:48 am to UltimaParadox
Posted on 8/15/26 at 10:48 am to UltimaParadox
quote:
With basically no job prospects and people unable to afford housing.
This is a big exaggeration and at most is a partial reason for some people. It’s certainly true that young people aren’t having as many kids, but there’s more to it than this. Anecdotally, I know a number of people who have good jobs, have houses and yet aren’t starting families.
Posted on 8/15/26 at 10:49 am to UltimaParadox
quote:
Only 1 in 4 women had jobs at the time. Majority of women did not work
They were raising kids and supporting their husbands. Creating a family nucleus. Something that is now looked down upon.
Posted on 8/15/26 at 10:50 am to St Augustine
quote:
What does that have to do with women currently not having babies until their 30s at my work.
Considering the context of the OP not sure how it is relevant. Considering you made a point about women in their 30s in response to the OP
Posted on 8/15/26 at 10:50 am to SloaneRanger
quote:The younger generations have been told to live for themselves, live selfishly, on top of being browbeat by politicians and celebrities over the world ending.
This is a big exaggeration and at most is a partial reason for some people. It’s certainly true that young people aren’t having as many kids, but there’s more to it than this. Anecdotally, I know a number of people who have good jobs, have houses and yet aren’t starting families.
We have created the most narcissistic and nihilistic generation in our history.
Posted on 8/15/26 at 10:51 am to SloaneRanger
quote:
This is a big exaggeration and at most is a partial reason for some people
There is no way with the data presented was it an exaggeration. The great depression was the primary reason. That is not debatable
Posted on 8/15/26 at 10:53 am to St Augustine
quote:
A lot of the women with good jobs at my work just haven’t really even started trying until a few years into their 30s. Some get pregnant quickly, others don’t. I just think some struggle more than if the same group started trying to have kids 5 years earlier.
You have to have a Masters to practice as a therapist. 5 of my 15 coworkers have been on maternity leave this year due to having kids. They’re all in their late 20s.
This post was edited on 8/15/26 at 10:53 am
Posted on 8/15/26 at 10:54 am to UltimaParadox
You mean starter homes that are 2x as big and have high end amenities.
Posted on 8/15/26 at 10:54 am to UptownJoeBrown
quote:
You mean starter homes that are 2x as big and have high end amenities.
At the time, the average home size in 1936 was 1129 sq ft... (from Gemini)
This post was edited on 8/15/26 at 10:55 am
Posted on 8/15/26 at 10:55 am to BluegrassBelle
quote:
You have to have a Masters to practice as a therapist. 5 of my 15 coworkers have been on maternity leave this year due to having kids. They’re all in their late 20s.
I know. The women I’m referring to are all PTs, OTs, and speech therapists. Many have clinical doctorates. Every one that has had kids in the last 5 years have been in their early to mid 30s.
This post was edited on 8/15/26 at 10:56 am
Posted on 8/15/26 at 10:57 am to UltimaParadox
We should absolutely incentivize ipper middle class to upper class people having kids
At least 10k tax write off for every kid if you make over 100k
At least 10k tax write off for every kid if you make over 100k
This post was edited on 8/15/26 at 10:58 am
Posted on 8/15/26 at 10:57 am to UltimaParadox
This has to be a not so subtle troll.
Calling the GI bill a government subsidy gives it away.
quote:
Outside of the baby boom, where the govt massively subsidized cheap living through the GI bill.
Calling the GI bill a government subsidy gives it away.
Posted on 8/15/26 at 10:58 am to armytiger96
quote:
This has to be a not so subtle troll.
I will say it proves nobody reads the posts or the chart
Posted on 8/15/26 at 11:05 am to UltimaParadox
Just remembered. I had 3 kids before I purchased my first home. I was 27-28 I think.
Posted on 8/15/26 at 11:05 am to Cosmo
quote:100%
We should absolutely incentivize ipper middle class to upper class people having kids
At least 10k tax write off for every kid if you make over 100k
It should be a 25% reduction in tax burden per child with a max of 100% at 4 children.
Only applicable if you receive zero welfare/subsidies.
This post was edited on 8/15/26 at 11:06 am
Posted on 8/15/26 at 11:05 am to UltimaParadox
Things are not “affordable” because the government is dumping money into entitlement programs. When money is taken from earners and given to leeches for a zero contribution, prices on goods and services increase.
Posted on 8/15/26 at 11:07 am to UltimaParadox
quote:
I will say it proves nobody reads the posts or the chart
I can't disagree. I was thinking the same thing reading most of the responses.
Posted on 8/15/26 at 11:08 am to armytiger96
quote:
I can't disagree. I was thinking the same thing reading most of the responses.
I edited to specifically call out the era... dont think it will help unless I change the title.
People only read the title
This post was edited on 8/15/26 at 11:09 am
Posted on 8/15/26 at 11:08 am to UltimaParadox
I agree with everything you posted. I also think widespread and accessible contraception is a major reason. Before around the 1960s women had children when nature happened. People are now prioritizing other things over children. It’s not a mystery.
Popular
Back to top


3






