Started By
Message

re: Inability to afford homes and essentials pushed birth rates to record lows

Posted on 8/15/26 at 10:48 am to
Posted by SloaneRanger
Upper Hurstville
Member since Jan 2014
14280 posts
Posted on 8/15/26 at 10:48 am to
quote:

With basically no job prospects and people unable to afford housing.


This is a big exaggeration and at most is a partial reason for some people. It’s certainly true that young people aren’t having as many kids, but there’s more to it than this. Anecdotally, I know a number of people who have good jobs, have houses and yet aren’t starting families.
Posted by Kolbysfan
Member since Jun 2007
2219 posts
Posted on 8/15/26 at 10:49 am to
quote:

Only 1 in 4 women had jobs at the time. Majority of women did not work


They were raising kids and supporting their husbands. Creating a family nucleus. Something that is now looked down upon.
Posted by UltimaParadox
North Carolina
Member since Nov 2008
52847 posts
Posted on 8/15/26 at 10:50 am to
quote:

What does that have to do with women currently not having babies until their 30s at my work.


Considering the context of the OP not sure how it is relevant. Considering you made a point about women in their 30s in response to the OP
Posted by Scruffy
Kansas City
Member since Jul 2011
77953 posts
Posted on 8/15/26 at 10:50 am to
quote:

This is a big exaggeration and at most is a partial reason for some people. It’s certainly true that young people aren’t having as many kids, but there’s more to it than this. Anecdotally, I know a number of people who have good jobs, have houses and yet aren’t starting families.
The younger generations have been told to live for themselves, live selfishly, on top of being browbeat by politicians and celebrities over the world ending.

We have created the most narcissistic and nihilistic generation in our history.
Posted by UltimaParadox
North Carolina
Member since Nov 2008
52847 posts
Posted on 8/15/26 at 10:51 am to
quote:

This is a big exaggeration and at most is a partial reason for some people


There is no way with the data presented was it an exaggeration. The great depression was the primary reason. That is not debatable
Posted by BluegrassBelle
RIP Hefty Lefty - 1981-2019
Member since Nov 2010
108894 posts
Posted on 8/15/26 at 10:53 am to
quote:

A lot of the women with good jobs at my work just haven’t really even started trying until a few years into their 30s. Some get pregnant quickly, others don’t. I just think some struggle more than if the same group started trying to have kids 5 years earlier.


You have to have a Masters to practice as a therapist. 5 of my 15 coworkers have been on maternity leave this year due to having kids. They’re all in their late 20s.

This post was edited on 8/15/26 at 10:53 am
Posted by UptownJoeBrown
Baton Rouge
Member since Jul 2024
11705 posts
Posted on 8/15/26 at 10:54 am to
You mean starter homes that are 2x as big and have high end amenities.
Posted by UltimaParadox
North Carolina
Member since Nov 2008
52847 posts
Posted on 8/15/26 at 10:54 am to
quote:

You mean starter homes that are 2x as big and have high end amenities.


At the time, the average home size in 1936 was 1129 sq ft... (from Gemini)
This post was edited on 8/15/26 at 10:55 am
Posted by St Augustine
The Pauper of the Surf
Member since Mar 2006
72426 posts
Posted on 8/15/26 at 10:55 am to
quote:

You have to have a Masters to practice as a therapist. 5 of my 15 coworkers have been on maternity leave this year due to having kids. They’re all in their late 20s.


I know. The women I’m referring to are all PTs, OTs, and speech therapists. Many have clinical doctorates. Every one that has had kids in the last 5 years have been in their early to mid 30s.
This post was edited on 8/15/26 at 10:56 am
Posted by Cosmo
glassman's guest house
Member since Oct 2003
132588 posts
Posted on 8/15/26 at 10:57 am to
We should absolutely incentivize ipper middle class to upper class people having kids

At least 10k tax write off for every kid if you make over 100k
This post was edited on 8/15/26 at 10:58 am
Posted by armytiger96
Member since Sep 2007
2945 posts
Posted on 8/15/26 at 10:57 am to
This has to be a not so subtle troll.

quote:

Outside of the baby boom, where the govt massively subsidized cheap living through the GI bill.


Calling the GI bill a government subsidy gives it away.
Posted by Hennigan
Member since Jan 2020
1482 posts
Posted on 8/15/26 at 10:57 am to
Things aren't good.
Posted by UltimaParadox
North Carolina
Member since Nov 2008
52847 posts
Posted on 8/15/26 at 10:58 am to
quote:

This has to be a not so subtle troll.


I will say it proves nobody reads the posts or the chart
Posted by NIH
Member since Aug 2008
124823 posts
Posted on 8/15/26 at 10:59 am to
This is how we win
Posted by Kolbysfan
Member since Jun 2007
2219 posts
Posted on 8/15/26 at 11:05 am to
Just remembered. I had 3 kids before I purchased my first home. I was 27-28 I think.
Posted by Scruffy
Kansas City
Member since Jul 2011
77953 posts
Posted on 8/15/26 at 11:05 am to
quote:

We should absolutely incentivize ipper middle class to upper class people having kids

At least 10k tax write off for every kid if you make over 100k
100%

It should be a 25% reduction in tax burden per child with a max of 100% at 4 children.

Only applicable if you receive zero welfare/subsidies.
This post was edited on 8/15/26 at 11:06 am
Posted by Purple Spoon
Hoth
Member since Feb 2005
21254 posts
Posted on 8/15/26 at 11:05 am to
Things are not “affordable” because the government is dumping money into entitlement programs. When money is taken from earners and given to leeches for a zero contribution, prices on goods and services increase.
Posted by armytiger96
Member since Sep 2007
2945 posts
Posted on 8/15/26 at 11:07 am to
quote:

I will say it proves nobody reads the posts or the chart


I can't disagree. I was thinking the same thing reading most of the responses.
Posted by UltimaParadox
North Carolina
Member since Nov 2008
52847 posts
Posted on 8/15/26 at 11:08 am to
quote:

I can't disagree. I was thinking the same thing reading most of the responses.


I edited to specifically call out the era... dont think it will help unless I change the title.

People only read the title
This post was edited on 8/15/26 at 11:09 am
Posted by Sofaking2
Member since Apr 2023
22132 posts
Posted on 8/15/26 at 11:08 am to
I agree with everything you posted. I also think widespread and accessible contraception is a major reason. Before around the 1960s women had children when nature happened. People are now prioritizing other things over children. It’s not a mystery.
first pageprev pagePage 2 of 3Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookXInstagram