- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Coaching Changes
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
Posted on 1/5/16 at 10:25 am to Rex
quote:
At any rate, I've said all I have to say on the subject and would just be repeating myself from here on out. Going to lunch.
thanks for ignoring 90% of my questions
Posted on 1/5/16 at 10:25 am to Rex
I love the pic of the dweebs in the article.
Posted on 1/5/16 at 10:26 am to LucasP
I'm not trying to say they are equivalently dangerous. One is more efficient for sure. What I'm trying to point out is that it takes an intent to want to kill for there to be an issue. And a gun being present doesn't automatically equate to someone wanting to kill.
If you knew someone was in the kitchen with a knife and they wanted to kill someone, then I can see wanting to leave. But you don't make the assumption that there is someone with the intent to kill. But, if you know there is a gun present, somehow, you assume there is an intent.
ETA: I'm totally against open carry in general. But from a standpoint that it's completely useless and I realize there will always be those with opposing views who will be uncomfortable and cause a scene. In addition, if you really feel you need to carry for safety, concealing is only beneficial to you. A shooter is going to target you first if you have a big shiny gun on your hip. Just wanted to clarify that I'm not some pro open carry gun nut who gets his jollies flexing his 2nd amendment right. I just think being scared of a person purely because they have a gun in a holster is goofy.
If you knew someone was in the kitchen with a knife and they wanted to kill someone, then I can see wanting to leave. But you don't make the assumption that there is someone with the intent to kill. But, if you know there is a gun present, somehow, you assume there is an intent.
ETA: I'm totally against open carry in general. But from a standpoint that it's completely useless and I realize there will always be those with opposing views who will be uncomfortable and cause a scene. In addition, if you really feel you need to carry for safety, concealing is only beneficial to you. A shooter is going to target you first if you have a big shiny gun on your hip. Just wanted to clarify that I'm not some pro open carry gun nut who gets his jollies flexing his 2nd amendment right. I just think being scared of a person purely because they have a gun in a holster is goofy.
This post was edited on 1/5/16 at 10:32 am
Posted on 1/5/16 at 10:28 am to Rex
quote:
Depends on the owner's own response, though
Posted on 1/5/16 at 10:30 am to Rex
Once again, liberals an't win at the ballot box, or in court so now they will throw their little temper tantrums like the spoiled children they are.
The good news is people are really tired of their bullshite and it is back firing in big ways...
The good news is people are really tired of their bullshite and it is back firing in big ways...
Posted on 1/5/16 at 10:31 am to Rex
quote:
Depends on the owner's own response
This is theft, you took the goods but will only settle your debts if the owner shares your political view. I'm just glad you finally admitted to it. I also believe that you and any subscribing to this belief would somehow find justification for not paying no matter the response.
List of posters to laugh at when they get on a moral high horse:
1. Rex
Posted on 1/5/16 at 10:31 am to Salmon
quote:
It is a legitimate fear to you.
But not to me.
Honest question, if a middle eastern guy or a typical nola thug walks into a restaurant carrying an ar-15, you wouldn't get a little nervous?
As LucasP said, both of the arguments are kind of ridiculous. I would not run out on a tab/break the law to try to prove a point, but I am also not eating somewhere attention whores are carrying long guns just because they can.
Posted on 1/5/16 at 10:32 am to Rex
This is assuming he notices the gun between eating and paying the bill right? Otherwise, the liberal bottom-feeder should leave before he orders right?
Posted on 1/5/16 at 10:32 am to NOFOX
quote:
Honest question, if a middle eastern guy or a typical nola thug walks into a restaurant carrying an ar-15, you wouldn't get a little nervous?
absolutely I would
I would also get a little nervous if a white guy walked in
but me being nervous would not justify me not paying
Posted on 1/5/16 at 10:34 am to Rex
So you will steal bases off the owners beliefs? Interesting
Bet you there's someone concealing where you go eat. Enjoy
Bet you there's someone concealing where you go eat. Enjoy
Posted on 1/5/16 at 10:35 am to NOFOX
Why are we jumping to people with AR15's in a restaurant? It's not like open carry means that every redneck is going to bring every gun he owns to Golden Corral with him.
Louisiana is open carry and I can recall one time in my life seeing someone open carry in a Target.
Louisiana is open carry and I can recall one time in my life seeing someone open carry in a Target.
Posted on 1/5/16 at 10:37 am to Rex
well, he could opt to conceal it in a restaurant
but I'll bet you'd pay for his lunch if he takes out a dirtbag that exposes himself, now wouldn't you?!
but I'll bet you'd pay for his lunch if he takes out a dirtbag that exposes himself, now wouldn't you?!
Posted on 1/5/16 at 10:37 am to Rex
quote:
the author's summation pretty much nails it:
quote:
it could be one of two things: either he’s a crazy person intent on killing someone or he’s a crazy person intent on showing his gun off in public and daring someone to ask him to leave it at home.
As I pointed out on the previous page, this is an "excluded middle" fallacy. It is simply not true that anyone who is openly carrying is crazy by definition.
This post was edited on 1/5/16 at 10:40 am
Posted on 1/5/16 at 10:38 am to poe tay toes
quote:
parading around with a loaded rifle (or even with an empty mag in place) to try to force people to deal with your, i don't know, gun-ness is alienating and counter-productive to the cause of preservation of gun rights.
I keep seeing this sentiment posted and it seems some of you have failed to do any research to figure out the proper context. That's exactly like what Rex does, posts without much understanding. The OC events happened mostly in Texas as a response to a rather idiotic law that banned OC of handguns but allowed OC of long guns. Those open carriers did get the law changed though which was the main point.
Posted on 1/5/16 at 10:40 am to KG6
quote:
Why are we jumping to people with AR15's in a restaurant? It's not like open carry means that every redneck is going to bring every gun he owns to Golden Corral with him.
Louisiana is open carry and I can recall one time in my life seeing someone open carry in a Target.
Alabama has been open carry for a few years now. I do see some guys open carrying from time to time. The last time was on a ride where I'd say probably close to a dozen or so were doing so. Not long before that I saw a guy I know in Huddle House with a 1911 on his hip. I've never seen anyone with a rifle though nor have I ever seen anyone open carrying doing anything that would cause concern.
Posted on 1/5/16 at 10:41 am to fr33manator
quote:
and a woman in a burka walks in
just wanted to point out, the only reason a burka is worn inside the USA, is to cause trouble...there is no other legit reason to bring that kind of culture to america, none!
Posted on 1/5/16 at 10:44 am to Rex
quote:So you're assuming the guy carrying the gun knows you??
I'm more likely to be a shooting victim by the person with the gun.
Posted on 1/5/16 at 10:45 am to foshizzle
quote:
As I pointed out on the previous page, this is an "excluded middle" fallacy. It is simply not true that anyone who is openly carrying is crazy by definition.
I'll furthermore add that this alternative:
quote:
a crazy person intent on showing his gun off in public and daring someone to ask him to leave it at home.
... does not imply a threat to anyone. Even if it can be a bit nutty.
So he (the guy who wrote this piece that is) is still nutty in his own way.
Popular
Back to top



1










