- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
| Favorite team: | LSU  |
| Location: | |
| Biography: | |
| Interests: | |
| Occupation: | |
| Number of Posts: | 64268 |
| Registered on: | 6/7/2006 |
| Online Status: | Not Online |
Recent Posts
Message
re: Georgia, yet again, faces a bunch of nobodies until now.
Posted by moneyg on 10/7/26 at 1:50 pm to ForeverGator
quote:
We're in what? Week 6? Georgia now faces an opponent with a pulse.
So sick of them getting a scheduling break.
I agree with your assessment of Georgia's schedule so far.
That's a legitimate disadvantage for Georgia vs. Alabama. Bama is much more tested at this point.
0
quote:
Sums up the current Saints (and Pelicans) situation. Everything needs to be scrubbed clean and start over.
The rebuild from all of that started last year when the Saints were able to get cap relief cutting Carr.
It was NEVER going to be a 1 year effort even with a 1 in 50 type of event (finding a QB in round 2).
The incompetence of the administration was always a threat to the success of the rebuild.
We are exactly where we were a month ago. You are right to be concerned. But the chances you have are based in stacking talent in the next 2-3 offseasons.
re: Democrats are going to win, because high gas prices - is the dumbest argument
Posted by moneyg on 10/7/26 at 1:01 pm to DarthRebel
Not agreeing it SHOULD be the reason isn’t the same as not saying it isn’t the reason.
Our population is rather dumb and rather easily influenced unfortunately.
Our population is rather dumb and rather easily influenced unfortunately.
Something would have to dramatically change for him to be a high draft prospect at QB.
But, his play recently has been different.
But, his play recently has been different.
re: Hunter Biden still selling paintings!
Posted by moneyg on 10/7/26 at 12:12 pm to boosiebadazz
quote:
Link?
nah.
go ahead and state for the record what you think about Biden, Hunter, Joe's brother, the shell companies, etc. Be explicit.
So, after reading a little about it, this is Trump Jr. being invested in a VC firm...that made an investment in a defense firm in 2025...and that defense firm getting contracts since then. It should be noted that the defense firm had significant growth prior to that during the Biden admin. It should also be noted that the VC firm has many holdings outside of this firm. On the surface, it doesn't look like this is a shell company or something like we saw with the Bidens.
I'm waiting for the OP to lay it out though. I only did a couple minutes of reading on it.
I'm waiting for the OP to lay it out though. I only did a couple minutes of reading on it.
quote:
Corruption is good when we’re in charge
Corruption is never good.
Unlike the OP, I'm certainly willing to look into these accusations. I definitely won't play defense like the OP did with Hunter and Biden and Burisma, etc.
Where are the details of this accusation so that I can read about them?
quote:
Or this board is just for fun and Im having it
So, this isn't a serious discussion?
quote:
do y'all think you're learning stuff by participating on this board?
this board has been described as an echo chamber, which it is, but it also breeds confirmation bias
You've made assumptions about what I and others think based on what someone else has posted in this thread. In fact, you've made assumptions about the entire board.
I'm quite aware that Paxton winning isn't a certainty. I don't think him losing is a certainty either unlike you. But, maybe I just don't know.
Don't take this personally, but many people make a statement, latch on to the first bad argument someone gives them, assigns that bad argument to the entire board, and concludes they are superior. It's just another form of very small minded thinking. SFP does it constantly. It's what you are doing here.
I respect you coming here pointing out what you are seeing on the ground. I don't really respect you coming here saying you are loving it and are going to be so happy pointing out you are right. I view the issue as more important than that. But, again, I realize people view life a bit differently than I do.
quote:
I don't need anything; the die is cast i'm just sitting here enjoying the build-up to the finale
and the more yall protest the funnier it is to me
Coping with life can be hard. Get enjoyment however you can, I guess.
quote:
You know the longer y'all drag this out and pretend that I didn't call this well in advance
the worst you're making it for yourselves
just admit I was right and I'll leave you all alone
well
Eventually
I don't think I'm dragging anything out. I'm saying the proof will be in the pudding.
Reading the tea leaves, things seem to be shifting towards Paxton lately. I think all of the craziness of Dems pretending Trump was calling for nuking California will help Republicans. And, I think the more the insanity of Talarico is exposed, it helps.
We shall see how it ends up. But, it is noted that you called your shot and even at this stage are still guaranteeing Paxton won't win.
re: If it's raining for the KY game, does that help us?
Posted by moneyg on 10/7/26 at 10:08 am to GeneralLee
quote:
Should make their home crowd fewer in number and our run game will still roll rain or shine.
I don't agree.
Our run game isn't dominant. We don't just line up and impose our will. It's system based and requires moving the chains and playing fast.
I'd never choose rain over good weather.
quote:
Its almost as if paxton is toxic and it's spreading
If only someone had warned us
DVers do you not appreciate truth?
We will see if Paxton wins.
re: Anyone else feel like this wkend has “Trap Game” written all over it?
Posted by moneyg on 10/7/26 at 8:58 am to TigerFan244
I don't think "Trap Game" is appropriate.
This sounds more like you previously assumed (wrongly) that LSU was a sure thing to win this game and now you are having second thoughts.
Kentucky is a legit middle tier SEC team. That makes them dangerous and very dangerous at home.
This sounds more like you previously assumed (wrongly) that LSU was a sure thing to win this game and now you are having second thoughts.
Kentucky is a legit middle tier SEC team. That makes them dangerous and very dangerous at home.
Right or wrong, they were mocking the idea and the people that believe it.
re: Do we miss any of the dudes that transferred OUT ahead of 2026 season
Posted by moneyg on 10/6/26 at 8:12 pm to KCSunshine
quote:
Thought we might miss were Kyle Parker, who doing ZERO at OS
This also surprises me.
re: Do we miss any of the dudes that transferred OUT ahead of 2026 season
Posted by moneyg on 10/6/26 at 8:12 pm to KCSunshine
quote:
Kaleb Jackson ok at NC but not missed
His running style matches what Kiffin wants more than it did the last couple of years.
Obviously we don’t miss him but I would have liked to see if he could have done something in this offense.
re: "Intentional Grounding"...
Posted by moneyg on 10/6/26 at 5:00 pm to Big Scrub TX
quote:
The name of this penalty has always stuck in my craw. It should instead be "illegal grounding". My logic is that a lot of intentionally grounded balls are illegal:
--those thrown into the 5th row of the stands that are obviously ju"st "thrown away".
The rule has changed over time. That's part of what's wrong.
Throwing it into the stands is not grounding. Grounding means just throwing it into the ground to avoid a sack. Back in the day, they would never call a penalty on a QB who throws the ball downfield to avoid a sack. However, now that has changed. And, it's bastardized the term grounding.
In my opinion, the rule should be that a QB who throws the ball past the line of scrimmage should not incur a penalty.
quote:
Related quibble: I don't like when a penalty is said to result in "loss of down". No. Virtually every play results in a "loss of down", but nobody ever says that. Like - "what an awesome 7 yard run he got on 1st down...too bad it resulted in a loss of down, and now it's 2nd down!!!"
This is a dumb thought
re: We aren’t as bad as last night, but we need to get healthy
Posted by moneyg on 10/6/26 at 2:25 pm to Safety Blitz
quote:
Need to get healthy and keep moving forward. I still think we win 8-9 games.
I just don't see that happening with the loss of Banks and the delay of getting Tyson back.
I do think the offense could end up being good before the season is up...but I just can't imagine us hanging in there long enough for it to matter.
re: Sam Leavitt says his hammy will be 100 percent by Saturday
Posted by moneyg on 10/6/26 at 2:19 pm to NorthTxLSU
quote:
If he can just figure out how to combine his scrambling ability with his gimpy leg passing game he will be frickin dangerous
We are already more dangerous with his passing ability he's displayed in the last two games minus his scrambling.
His play is easily the reason we have a fighting chance to do something special. We weren't going to get there with how he played up until A&M.
re: If you didn’t expect last nights outcome, you’re blind
Posted by moneyg on 10/6/26 at 1:38 pm to Lsujacket66
quote:
If you didn’t expect last nights outcome, you’re blind
The only real argument that the Saints were going to win last night was related to it being the Katrina game anniversary.
The injuries that weakened our run defense was CLEARLY a major problem for a team like Atlanta.
People also won't be able to ignore how bad the OL is now. That reality will hurt our passing game significantly moving forward.
re: Love or hate Sean but after an effort like last night hell would have rained down
Posted by moneyg on 10/6/26 at 1:35 pm to LSUPilot07
quote:
Love or hate Sean but after an effort like last night hell would have rained down
You think the issue last night was related to effort?
Popular
29
