- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
| Favorite team: | LSU  |
| Location: | |
| Biography: | |
| Interests: | |
| Occupation: | |
| Number of Posts: | 56385 |
| Registered on: | 6/7/2006 |
| Online Status: | Not Online |
Recent Posts
Message
re: ZeroHedge: Washington's Pleas Fall on Deaf Ears as Ukraine Strikes Russian Refineries
Posted by moneyg on 4/26/24 at 10:32 pm
...and we thought the 60+ Billion would only cost us 60B. So naive.
...
0
Christian Little found/perfected a new pitch
Posted by moneyg on 4/26/24 at 9:03 pm
...and that thing is probably the best pitch on the staff.
...
re: Today is Lester Earl Day: Maason Smith in the 2nd to JAC, 48th overall
Posted by moneyg on 4/26/24 at 7:50 pm
He made the right decision. ...
re: ST. George WINS Incorporation is a reality!
Posted by moneyg on 4/26/24 at 7:44 pm
[quote]They are probably going to have to litigate the boundaries first[/quote]
:lol:
Explain what you think will happen. ...
re: ST. George WINS Incorporation is a reality!
Posted by moneyg on 4/26/24 at 7:43 pm
[quote]And yes, Baton Rouge will lose tax revenue, but they also lose a lot of expenses[/quote]
Can you name one?...
re: ST. George WINS Incorporation is a reality!
Posted by moneyg on 4/26/24 at 5:15 pm
[quote]So I guess no more incorporations anywhere.
[/quote]
True conservatives are required to live in unincorporated areas and bend over and take it while the neighboring incorporated area steals your taxes....
re: SCOTUS isn’t going to mess with immunity
Posted by moneyg on 4/26/24 at 1:40 pm
[quote]If that clause was meant to address double jeopardy, why would it reference the party convicted instead of the party impeached?
Think about that for a second.
[/quote]
How about you just answer it.
[quote]Sure, but the example of a prior conviction is better for clarify.
[/quote] :...
re: SCOTUS isn’t going to mess with immunity
Posted by moneyg on 4/26/24 at 1:32 pm
[quote]The one clarifying that "conviction" is not one for criminal matters, ie, double jeopardy does not apply?
[/quote]
If that clause was meant to address double jeopardy, why would it reference the party convicted instead of the party impeached? Certainly double jeopardy is applicable to th...
re: SCOTUS isn’t going to mess with immunity
Posted by moneyg on 4/26/24 at 1:21 pm
[quote]Clearly he's not facing double jeopardy, then.[/quote]
What do you mean?...
re: Are Saints fans still afraid of the Falcons?
Posted by moneyg on 4/26/24 at 12:55 pm
[quote]This board melted when they signed Cousins. I could never understand why... Cousins ain't that good. I'm not scared of Cousins.
Then after last night... LOL...[/quote]
I don’t think highly of Penix. I thought he had poor footwork with traffic in the pocket. And I thought his throws w...
re: LA. Supreme Court Rules in Favor of St. George Incorporators
Posted by moneyg on 4/26/24 at 12:40 pm
[quote]And frick every company that bowed to racial pressure and petitioned to stay in Baton Rouge and opposed St. George’s incorporation.[/quote]
Illegal...
re: ST. George WINS Incorporation is a reality!
Posted by moneyg on 4/26/24 at 12:32 pm
Time to start discussing the damages done to St. George from this lawsuit.
Anybody got a round number of tax revenue that is owed?...
re: ST. George WINS Incorporation is a reality!
Posted by moneyg on 4/26/24 at 12:30 pm
Huge ...
re: SCOTUS isn’t going to mess with immunity
Posted by moneyg on 4/26/24 at 12:21 pm
[quote]Which language creates a requirement that the above "conviction" is required for a criminal trial?[/quote]
Why would the following clause be needed at all then?...
re: SCOTUS isn’t going to mess with immunity
Posted by moneyg on 4/26/24 at 12:19 pm
[quote]That is the reason why they clarify "the party convicted" can still face criminal prosecution. [/quote]
In this case Trump is a party not convicted. ...
re: SCOTUS isn’t going to mess with immunity
Posted by moneyg on 4/26/24 at 12:18 pm
[quote]Again, that line is just saying that a party convicted by the Senate may still face criminal prosecution (following the trend of the clause in separating the two actions). [/quote]
That’s the interpretation that you were taught. It may be the interpretation that the USSC would agree with. ...
re: University of FL showing how to handle the Democrat Jew-hating protestors
Posted by moneyg on 4/26/24 at 11:59 am
[quote]I don't get the anti-Israel hatred outside of being pro-Muslim. [/quote]
Yes you do.
The victimhood complex (as you have obviously seen in your own community) dictates that Jews are the bad guy. ...
re: SCOTUS isn’t going to mess with immunity
Posted by moneyg on 4/26/24 at 11:46 am
[quote]Clear separation between impeachment (the political remedy) and prosecution (the criminal remedy).[/quote]
[quote][b]but the party convicted[/b][/quote]
I realize the consensus legal opinion matches what you are saying but the text is not nearly as clear as you pretend.
...
re: Ford lost $40K on every EV it sold
Posted by moneyg on 4/26/24 at 11:11 am
[quote]Ford lost $40K on every EV it sold
[/quote] :lol:...
re: Lebron: “ At the end of the day, it’s just basketball”
Posted by moneyg on 4/26/24 at 7:49 am
Under the assumption that the context of this was him saying:
"I'm not that disappointed because...at the end of the day, it's just basketball"
Then this legitimately a bad look. ...
Popular
20
