Started By
Message

re: History buffs: Which losing presidential candidates would have made good presidents?

Posted on 7/28/20 at 7:10 pm to
Posted by noonan
Nassau Bay, TX
Member since Aug 2005
37017 posts
Posted on 7/28/20 at 7:10 pm to
Good presidents, or would have been better than the dirt bag that won. That's the question that people will answer.
Posted by lostinbr
Baton Rouge, LA
Member since Oct 2017
12866 posts
Posted on 7/28/20 at 7:14 pm to
quote:

Would have loved to see Bush in a timeline where 9/11 never happened.

We might have found a way to invade Iraq twice.
Posted by OleWar
Troy H. Middleton Library
Member since Mar 2008
5828 posts
Posted on 7/28/20 at 7:17 pm to
I like Goldwater the best, but if I could change history, I might choose Hughes. Curtailing Wilson to one term may have stopped a lot of foolishness.
Posted by red sox fan 13
Valley Park
Member since Aug 2018
19244 posts
Posted on 7/28/20 at 7:20 pm to
Woodrow Wilson sucks. frick that guy. Imagine how great America would be if Teddy Roosevelt and the Bull Moose Party won in 1912?
Posted by Michael T. Tiger
Baton Rouge
Member since Jul 2004
8939 posts
Posted on 7/28/20 at 7:29 pm to
Clinton had the Twin Towers bomber on his watch but was too busy fricking Monica to notice. That gave Bin Laden eight years to come up with a new strategy.
Posted by teke184
Zachary, LA
Member since Jan 2007
105262 posts
Posted on 7/28/20 at 7:31 pm to
Based on that list, my immediate thought is Thomas Dewey.

Most of those on that list who lost would have been mediocre at best or would have been worse than the actual winner.

My runner up to Dewey would probably be Stevenson.
Posted by kingbob
Sorrento, LA
Member since Nov 2010
71246 posts
Posted on 7/28/20 at 7:35 pm to
I’d be fascinated to know what life would be like if Barry Goldwater had been elected in 1964 or Thomas Dewey in 44 or 48. We could be in a much better or worse world.

Charles Hughes is another interesting what if.

Teddy in 1912 would have been epic.
This post was edited on 7/28/20 at 7:37 pm
Posted by cypresstiger
The South
Member since Aug 2008
14511 posts
Posted on 7/28/20 at 7:37 pm to
Humphrey
Posted by Celery
Nuevo York
Member since Nov 2010
11748 posts
Posted on 7/28/20 at 7:41 pm to
McGovern, Gore, McCain, Romney
Posted by Roll Tide Ravens
Birmingham, AL
Member since Nov 2015
51988 posts
Posted on 7/28/20 at 7:43 pm to
quote:

I don’t like LBJ but I’m not so sure Goldwater would be a good president either. We had a long period of total shite in Washington between the Kennedy and Reagan administrations.


I actually think President Nixon was a pretty good president who would be been well regarded in history had he not let his paranoia get to him.
Posted by LSUBoo
Knoxville, TN
Member since Mar 2006
104494 posts
Posted on 7/28/20 at 7:43 pm to
Ross Perot
Posted by tigercross
Member since Feb 2008
5075 posts
Posted on 7/28/20 at 7:50 pm to
quote:

Would have loved to see Bush in a timeline where 9/11 never happened.


That’s like saying you’d like to see Alabama win a title in the last 20 yrs without Saban. GWB was complicit in 9/11 and used it as the keystone for all of the shite he did for the next 7 years. Wars, patriot act, etc.
Posted by LSUcdro
Republic of West Florida
Member since Sep 2009
11363 posts
Posted on 7/28/20 at 7:51 pm to
Alf Landon... hell of a guy, even better singer
Posted by GetCocky11
Calgary, AB
Member since Oct 2012
53509 posts
Posted on 7/28/20 at 7:56 pm to
quote:

Would have loved to see Bush in a timeline where 9/11 never happened.


I mean, we got a good taste of his pre-9/11 goals in No Child Left Behind, the tax cut, and Medicare reform (Medicare Part D) in his first term.

His second term seemed completely consumed by the wars, in my memory.
This post was edited on 7/28/20 at 8:00 pm
Posted by LSUJuice
Back in Houston
Member since Apr 2004
18053 posts
Posted on 7/28/20 at 7:57 pm to
quote:

if I could change history, I might choose Hughes. Curtailing Wilson to one term may have stopped a lot of foolishness.

This
Posted by Antonio Moss
The South
Member since Mar 2006
49580 posts
Posted on 7/28/20 at 8:17 pm to
Goldwater
Posted by SoFla Tideroller
South Florida
Member since Apr 2010
41916 posts
Posted on 7/28/20 at 8:43 pm to
Goldwater
Posted by AgCoug
Houston
Member since Jan 2014
6775 posts
Posted on 7/28/20 at 8:47 pm to
quote:

1912: Eugene Debs


Commie

I should clarify: no he would have not made a good president. Still, the fact that he garnered over 5% of the popular vote is telling about socialist movements in the US.
This post was edited on 7/28/20 at 8:50 pm
Posted by greenbean
USAF Retired - 31 years
Member since Feb 2019
6612 posts
Posted on 7/28/20 at 8:56 pm to
quote:

Clinton had the Twin Towers bomber on his watch but was too busy fricking Monica to notice. That gave Bin Laden eight years to come up with a new strategy.



Yuup, Clinton's inattention to foreign enemies and international affairs left a mess for Bush.
Posted by Lima Whiskey
Member since Apr 2013
22594 posts
Posted on 7/28/20 at 9:56 pm to
quote:

By the way, this a damn good thread, OP. Legitimately thought provoking.


Agreed

-

Reading over these names, there’s a reason a lot of these men lost.

I do think we would be in a better place if Gore won, but that may say more about Bush then anything else. And I do think Dole would have been a better President than Clinton.
This post was edited on 7/28/20 at 9:57 pm
first pageprev pagePage 3 of 7Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookXInstagram