- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: History buffs: Which losing presidential candidates would have made good presidents?
Posted on 7/28/20 at 7:10 pm to RollTide1987
Posted on 7/28/20 at 7:10 pm to RollTide1987
Good presidents, or would have been better than the dirt bag that won. That's the question that people will answer.
Posted on 7/28/20 at 7:14 pm to Ssubba
quote:
Would have loved to see Bush in a timeline where 9/11 never happened.
We might have found a way to invade Iraq twice.
Posted on 7/28/20 at 7:17 pm to RollTide1987
I like Goldwater the best, but if I could change history, I might choose Hughes. Curtailing Wilson to one term may have stopped a lot of foolishness.
Posted on 7/28/20 at 7:20 pm to OleWar
Woodrow Wilson sucks. frick that guy. Imagine how great America would be if Teddy Roosevelt and the Bull Moose Party won in 1912?
Posted on 7/28/20 at 7:29 pm to LurkerTooLong
Clinton had the Twin Towers bomber on his watch but was too busy fricking Monica to notice. That gave Bin Laden eight years to come up with a new strategy.
Posted on 7/28/20 at 7:31 pm to RollTide1987
Based on that list, my immediate thought is Thomas Dewey.
Most of those on that list who lost would have been mediocre at best or would have been worse than the actual winner.
My runner up to Dewey would probably be Stevenson.
Most of those on that list who lost would have been mediocre at best or would have been worse than the actual winner.
My runner up to Dewey would probably be Stevenson.
Posted on 7/28/20 at 7:35 pm to RollTide1987
I’d be fascinated to know what life would be like if Barry Goldwater had been elected in 1964 or Thomas Dewey in 44 or 48. We could be in a much better or worse world.
Charles Hughes is another interesting what if.
Teddy in 1912 would have been epic.
Charles Hughes is another interesting what if.
Teddy in 1912 would have been epic.
This post was edited on 7/28/20 at 7:37 pm
Posted on 7/28/20 at 7:41 pm to RollTide1987
McGovern, Gore, McCain, Romney
Posted on 7/28/20 at 7:43 pm to red sox fan 13
quote:
I don’t like LBJ but I’m not so sure Goldwater would be a good president either. We had a long period of total shite in Washington between the Kennedy and Reagan administrations.
I actually think President Nixon was a pretty good president who would be been well regarded in history had he not let his paranoia get to him.
Posted on 7/28/20 at 7:50 pm to Ssubba
quote:
Would have loved to see Bush in a timeline where 9/11 never happened.
That’s like saying you’d like to see Alabama win a title in the last 20 yrs without Saban. GWB was complicit in 9/11 and used it as the keystone for all of the shite he did for the next 7 years. Wars, patriot act, etc.
Posted on 7/28/20 at 7:51 pm to RollTide1987
Alf Landon... hell of a guy, even better singer
Posted on 7/28/20 at 7:56 pm to Ssubba
quote:
Would have loved to see Bush in a timeline where 9/11 never happened.
I mean, we got a good taste of his pre-9/11 goals in No Child Left Behind, the tax cut, and Medicare reform (Medicare Part D) in his first term.
His second term seemed completely consumed by the wars, in my memory.
This post was edited on 7/28/20 at 8:00 pm
Posted on 7/28/20 at 7:57 pm to OleWar
quote:
if I could change history, I might choose Hughes. Curtailing Wilson to one term may have stopped a lot of foolishness.
This
Posted on 7/28/20 at 8:47 pm to RollTide1987
quote:
1912: Eugene Debs
Commie
I should clarify: no he would have not made a good president. Still, the fact that he garnered over 5% of the popular vote is telling about socialist movements in the US.
This post was edited on 7/28/20 at 8:50 pm
Posted on 7/28/20 at 8:56 pm to Michael T. Tiger
quote:
Clinton had the Twin Towers bomber on his watch but was too busy fricking Monica to notice. That gave Bin Laden eight years to come up with a new strategy.
Yuup, Clinton's inattention to foreign enemies and international affairs left a mess for Bush.
Posted on 7/28/20 at 9:56 pm to MDB
quote:
By the way, this a damn good thread, OP. Legitimately thought provoking.
Agreed
-
Reading over these names, there’s a reason a lot of these men lost.
I do think we would be in a better place if Gore won, but that may say more about Bush then anything else. And I do think Dole would have been a better President than Clinton.
This post was edited on 7/28/20 at 9:57 pm
Popular
Back to top


0









